Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersohioctapp

10,000+ results

1.74s

  • Highland Towers Akron, L.L.C. v. Summit Cty. Bd. of Revision

    2012 Ohio 4386 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 26, 2012

    Blakemore v. … v. Cuyahoga Cty.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Jones v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth.

    2023 Ohio 1340 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 25, 2023

    Manns v. … Indeed, the parole board's reasoning in its decisions is consistent with the explicitly provided factors under Ohio Adm.Code 5120:1-1-07 in effect at the times of the parole hearings. See Swihart v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. McLeod

    2015 Ohio 93 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 12, 2015

    Brown checked for their keys, but could not find them. Brown testified that he left the keys hanging on the wall in the basement construction office on Friday night when he left. (T. at 305-306). … State v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • State v. Lyndhurst Mun. Court, 90779 (2-8-2008)

    2008 Ohio 607 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 8, 2008

    Brown , Lyndhurst Municipal Court Case No. 07CVG01493, a forcible entry and detainer action. Brown submits that the trial court is without jurisdiction to enforce its judgment, because the case is on appeal. … Brown , Case No. 90680.

    Cited 1 timesUnpublished
  • In Re Niehaus

    62 Ohio App. 3d 89 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 28, 1989

    The Supreme Court in Arlen v. … Barnes, and subsequently the board, had the medical expertise to make such a determination. See Arlen v. State, supra.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Licking Hts. Local School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. Licking Cty. Bd. of Revision

    2025 Ohio 955 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 19, 2025

    Bd. of Edn. v. Licking Cty. Bd. of Revision, 2025-Ohio-955.] … Furthermore, we held that a board of education is statutorily prohibited from appealing a decision of the board of revision to either the Board of Tax Appeals or the common pleas court.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In re S.D.

    2020 Ohio 941 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 13, 2020

    Id. at 383; State v. Obsaint, 1st Dist. Hamilton No. … State v. Brown, 1st Dist. Hamilton No. C-180180, 2019-Ohio-3349.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Hordin v. City of Cleveland

    77 Ohio App. 491 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 9, 1945

    Doria, v. … See, also, Fuller Smith v. Routzahn, 23 F.2d 959 . In the case of Ward v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • In Re Senders

    110 Ohio App. 3d 199 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 1, 1996

    In State v. … Bd. of Commrs. v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • State v. Davis

    2019 Ohio 4672 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 14, 2019

    State v. Hampton, 134 Ohio St.3d 447, 2012- Ohio-5688, 983 N.E.2d 324, ¶ 19, quoting State v. … In support of his sufficiency challenge on these counts, appellant directs this court to State v. Brown, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 99024, 2013- Ohio-3134.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Copeland Corp. v. Ohio Department of Industrial Relations, Division of Factory & Building Inspection

    53 Ohio App. 3d 23 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 22, 1988

    Univ. of Cincinnati v. Conrad (1980), 63 Ohio St. 2d 108 , 17 O.O. 3d 65, 407 N.E. 2d 1265 . … . * * *” Id. at 110 , 17 O.O. 3d at 67, 407 N.E. 2d at 1267 , citing Andrews v. Bd. of Liquor Control (1955), 164 Ohio St. 275 , 279-280, 58 O.O. 51 , 53, 131 N.E. 2d 390 , 393.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Hosta v. Chrysler

    172 Ohio App. 3d 654 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 17, 2007

    Rice v. … See Gibson Guitar Corp. v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Prohazka v. State Univ. Bd. of Trustees, Unpublished Decision (12-16-1999)

    Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 16, 1999

    In Browning v. … See Okure, supra; Bojac Corp. v. Kutevac (1990), 64 Ohio App.3d 368 , 370 (declining to follow Browning ). In Weethee v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • State v. Landon

    2021 Ohio 3553 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 4, 2021

    [Cite as State v. Landon, 2021-Ohio-3553.] … a board of elections, or which reasonably construed appears to be a communication from such a board and which was intended to be so construed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Miller v. Blume

    2013 Ohio 5290 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 27, 2013

    Gilmour Realty, Inc. v. … Bank v. Loncar, 7th Dist. No. 12MA104, 2013-Ohio-3350, ¶ 28-30; Citibank v. McGee, 7th Dist. No. 11MA158, 2102-Ohio-5364, ¶ 29; American Express Centurian Bank v. Banaie, 7th Dist. No. 10MA9, 2010-Ohio-6503, ¶ 17.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Singer v. Davids

    2011 Ohio 4434 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 25, 2011

    Pons v. Ohio State Medical Board (1993), 66 Ohio St.3d 619, 1993-Ohio-122, 614 N.E.2d 748, citing Lorain City School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. State Emp. … Bd. of Edn. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Automation Tool & Die, Inc. v. Ohio Bur. of Workers' Comp.

    2016 Ohio 4882 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 7, 2016

    Perrysburg Twp. v. Rossford, 103 Ohio St.3d 79, 81, 2004-Ohio-4362, ¶ 5; Cincinnati v. Beretta U.S.A. Corp., 95 Ohio St.3d 416, 418, 2002-Ohio-2480, ¶ 5. … Mitchell v. Lawson Milk Co., 40 Ohio St.3d 190, 192 (1988).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Plotts

    2011 Ohio 900 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 28, 2011

    State v. Brown (1995), 107 Ohio App.3d 194, 200. {¶26} “[A] strict chain of custody is not always required in order for physical evidence to be admissible.” State v. Wilkins (1980), 64 Ohio St.2d 382, 389. … Brown, 107 Ohio App.3d at 200, citing State v. Blevins (1987), 36 Ohio App.3d 147, 150.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Gordon v. Young, Admr.

    113 Ohio App. 81 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 29, 1960

    The cases involving appeals from the Board of Tax Appeals are the most numerous, and we will start with them in our review. In American Restaurant & Lunch Co. v. … Thus it is the order of the board of review that is being appealed from.”

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Baryak v. Trumbull Cty. Bd. of Elections

    2019 Ohio 4655 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 12, 2019

    Regarding the first element, a county board of elections exercises quasi-judicial power when it holds a hearing under R.C. 3501.39 and denies a relator’s protest. State ex rel. McCord v. Delaware Cty. … Thurn v. Cuyahoga Cty.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.