Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersohioctapp

10,000+ results

1.29s

  • Allen v. Mill Creek Metro. Park Dist.

    257 N.E.3d 307 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 23, 2024

    Doe v. … However, a power will not be implied where the board has the means to decide the issue within the confines of its express authority. State ex rel. Mallory v. Pub. Emp.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Stec v. Bd. of Education of Lorain City School District

    49 Ohio App. 2d 101 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 13, 1974

    She cites, as authority, the recent case of DeLong v. Board of Edn. (1973), 36 Ohio St. 2d 62 (which was decided subsequent to the trial court’s ruling in the case of Jacobson v. … Accordingly, we overrule the case of Jacobson v. Avon Board of Education, supra.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Glickman v. Coakley

    22 Ohio App. 3d 49 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 26, 1984

    Co. v. McFerren (1968), 14 Ohio St.2d 251 [ 43 O.O.2d 432 ]; West L.A. Institute for Cancer Research v. Mayer (C.A.9, 1966), 366 F.2d 220 , 223 ; Lowenschuss v. Kane (S.D.N.Y. 1973), 367 F. Supp. 911 , 915 . … I.T.T. v. United States (Ct. Claims 1972), 453 F.2d 1283 , 1290 ; Ducc Realty Co. v. Cox (Tex.Civ.App. 1962), 356 S.W.2d 807 ; Bollen v. McCarty (1972), 252 Ark. 442 , 479 S.W.2d 568 .

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • State v. Aquila

    2016 Ohio 5140 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 28, 2016

    [Cite as State v. Aquila, 2016-Ohio-5140.] … when there is a full board hearing, and a full board hearing was not conducted in the instant case.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Hitchcock v. Akron City Schools Board of Education, 23632 (6-4-2008)

    2008 Ohio 2668 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 4, 2008

    Cited 2 timesUnpublished
  • Hensley v. Toledo Area Regional Transit Authority

    121 Ohio App. 3d 603 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 27, 1997

    Roseman v. … In Novak v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Board of County Comms. v. Marblehead, Unpublished Decision (4-17-1998)

    Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 17, 1998

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Hilbert v. Hilbert

    2016 Ohio 8099 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 12, 2016

    Mannerino v. Mannerino, 12th Dist. Butler No. CA2010-08- 210, 2012-Ohio-1592, ¶ 9. To that end, the trial court possesses considerable discretion in child support matters. Brown v. Brown, 12th Dist. Butler No. … Boyer v. Hacker, 12th Dist. Brown No. CA2013-08-009, 2014-Ohio-760, ¶ 8.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Jeffers v. Athens Cty. Commrs.

    2016 Ohio 8119 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 6, 2016

    Pointer v. Detroit, 2011 WL 2580664, (U.S.D.C.). {¶44} The Board directs us to Trafalgar Corp. v. … Darby v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Matthews v. Administrator Bureau of Unemployment Compensation

    66 Ohio Law. Abs. 183 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 1, 1951

    The law generally is summarized by Judge Zimmerman in the case of Castleberry v. … We deem applicable to the present circumstance the statement by Judge Bettman in Couk v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Weller v. Tuscarawas Cty. Bd. of Elections

    2019 Ohio 4032 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 30, 2019

    Greene v. Montgomery Cty. … Husted v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State v. Curtis

    2018 Ohio 911 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 12, 2018

    His conviction was affirmed on direct appeal in State v. Curtis, 12th Dist. Brown No. … State v. Blankenburg, 12th Dist. Butler No.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Plotts

    2011 Ohio 900 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 28, 2011

    State v. Brown (1995), 107 Ohio App.3d 194, 200. {¶26} “[A] strict chain of custody is not always required in order for physical evidence to be admissible.” State v. Wilkins (1980), 64 Ohio St.2d 382, 389. … Brown, 107 Ohio App.3d at 200, citing State v. Blevins (1987), 36 Ohio App.3d 147, 150.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • In Re Niehaus

    62 Ohio App. 3d 89 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 28, 1989

    The Supreme Court in Arlen v. … Barnes, and subsequently the board, had the medical expertise to make such a determination. See Arlen v. State, supra.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Licking Hts. Local School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. Licking Cty. Bd. of Revision

    2025 Ohio 955 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 19, 2025

    Bd. of Edn. v. Licking Cty. Bd. of Revision, 2025-Ohio-955.] … Furthermore, we held that a board of education is statutorily prohibited from appealing a decision of the board of revision to either the Board of Tax Appeals or the common pleas court.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • B.R. Knez Constr., Inc.

    2019 Ohio 3149 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 5, 2019

    Kisil v. … * * *” Duncan v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Baron v. Civ. Serv. Bd. of Dayton

    2012 Ohio 6179 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 28, 2012

    For example, in Royse v. … Giannini v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Biggert v. Highland Cty. Bd. of Dev. Disabilities

    2013 Ohio 2112 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 15, 2013

    Blakemore v. Blakemore, 5 Ohio St.3d 217, 219, 450 N.E.2d 1140 (1983). Absent an abuse of discretion, we must affirm the judgment of the trial court. Benincasa at ¶ 19; citing Doll v. … Stark County Board of MRDD, 5th Dist. No.2001CA00255, 2001-Ohio-7052; citing Unit. Hosp., Univ. of Cincinnati College of Medicine v. State Emp.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • In Re Senders

    110 Ohio App. 3d 199 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 1, 1996

    In State v. … Bd. of Commrs. v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Licking Hts. Local School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. Licking Cty. Bd. of Revision

    2025 Ohio 953 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 19, 2025

    Bd. of Edn. v. Licking Cty. Bd. of Revision, 2025-Ohio-953.] … Furthermore, we held that a board of education is statutorily prohibited from appealing a decision of the board of revision to either the Board of Tax Appeals or the common pleas court.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.