Case law

In Re Jones

69 Ohio App. 3d 114 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 9, 1990

As the Ohio Supreme Court held in Arlen v. … The trial court abused its discretion by reversing the order of the board based on the degree of discipline imposed. See Henry’s Cafe, Inc. v.

In Re Rocky Point Plaza Corp.

86 Ohio App. 3d 486 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 23, 1993

Only variances and conditional use permits (and some other permits) come before a board of zoning appeals in the ordinary situation. In Arcaro Bros. Builders, Inc. v. N. … In Stores Realty Co. v.

Carpenter v. Scherer-Mountain Insurance Agency

135 Ohio App. 3d 316 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 19, 1999

Scherer-Mountain filed a third-party complaint against the Lawrence County Board of Commissioners, alleging that any damages the Carpenters had suffered were due to the commissioners’ failure to properly implement policies … Feitshans v.

Ohio Multi-Use Trails Ass'n v. Vinton County Commissioners

182 Ohio App. 3d 32 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 21, 2009

Nord Community Mental Health Ctr. v. Lorain Cty. (1994), 93 Ohio App.3d 363, 365 , 638 N.E.2d 623 , citing Logan v. … See Armate Assoc., Ltd. v.

State v. Sweeten

2016 Ohio 5828 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 16, 2016

Brown at ¶ 1-2. … State v. Brown, 115 Ohio St.3d 55, 2007-Ohio-4837, 873 N.E.2d 858, ¶ 65; State v. Thomas, 1st Dist. Hamilton No. C-120561, 2013-Ohio-5386, ¶ 53.

State v. Casteel

2012 Ohio 2295 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 18, 2012

[Cite as State v. Casteel, 2012-Ohio-2295.] … Appellant appealed the October 18, 2011 judgment entry. {¶14} The state argues this case is similar to the case of State v. Brown, Licking App. No. 10-CA-133, 2011-Ohio-3645.

Adams v. Harding Machine Co.

56 Ohio App. 3d 150 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 23, 1989

In Mers v. … In Goodson v.

Wagner v. Board of Zoning Appeals, Unpublished Decision (3-25-2005)

2005 Ohio 1377 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 25, 2005

Community of Concerned Citizens v. Union Township (1993), 66 Ohio St.3d 452 . The court may not substitute its judgment for the judgment of the board, officer or agency that made the decision. Kisil v. … Bd. of Edn. v. State Employees Relation Bd. (1988), 40 Ohio St.3d 257 . {¶ 10} "`Abuse of discretion' has been defined as an attitude that is unreasonable, arbitrary or unconscionable. Huffman v.

Cunningham v. Jerry Spears Co.

119 Ohio App. 169 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 21, 1963

In General Motors Corp. v. … See Roma v. Industrial Commission (1918), 97 Ohio St., 247 , at 253. While there may be no burden of proof, there must be a basis for rational judgment.

State v. Pope

2022 Ohio 426 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 14, 2022

In State v. Hodgkin, 12th Dist. Warren No. … For example, in State v. Brown Suber, 12th Dist. Butler No.

In re J.M.

2013 Ohio 4139 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 3, 2013

. {¶5} The caseworker assigned to the matter, Kristal Brown and her supervisor, Cindy Moore testified. Kristal Brown testified Mother has three older children. … Seasons Coal v. Cleveland, 10 Ohio St.3d 77, 80, 461 N.E.2d 1273 (1984).

Mordick v. Dayton

2012 Ohio 289 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 27, 2012

[Cite as Mordick v. Dayton, 2012-Ohio-289.] … Kisil v. Sandusky (1984), 12 Ohio St.3d 30, 34, 12 OBR 26, 30, 465 N.E.2d 848, 852.

State v. Sanders

2022 Ohio 1066 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 31, 2022

Brown, a veteran who honorably served in the armed forces, came from inside the laundromat where he worked and pleaded with Sanders to put the gun down. Sanders shot Brown in the stomach. … App.R. 16(A)(7). 3 In State v.

State ex rel. Slacas v. KCI Technologies, Inc.

2022 Ohio 4573 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 19, 2022

Pelletier v. … v.

Colerain Capital, L.L.C. v. Hamilton Cty. Aud.

2023 Ohio 56 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 11, 2023

The Auditor and the Northwest Local School District Board of Education (“school board”) argue to retain the existing valuation. … Othman v. Bd. of Edn., 1st Dist. Hamilton Nos.

State, Ex Rel. Wright v. Morrison

80 Ohio App. 135 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 17, 1947

Likewise, in Mell, et al. v State, ex rel., 130 Oh St 306, the only question presented related to the rules of the board and the effect of a change of rule. Robert E. … Karb v State, supra, was followed in Roth v Trustees, 62 Oh St 659. And in State, ex rel. Dawn v Kyle, 75 Oh Ap 30, this Court has occasion to apply the same principle.

Jacovetty v. Browning Ferris Indus.

2021 Ohio 1400 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 22, 2021

[Cite as Jacovetty v. Browning Ferris Indus., 2021-Ohio-1400.] … Brown v. Gen. Motors Corp., 38 Ohio St.2d 286, 286, 313 N.E.2d 383 (1974). The two-issue rule does not apply.

State ex rel. Wengerd v. Baughman Twp. Bd. of Trustees

2014 Ohio 4749 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 27, 2014

Wengerd v. Baughman Twp. Bd. of Trustees, 2014-Ohio-4749.] … Krueck v. Kipton Village Council, 9th Dist. Lorain No. 11CA009960, 2012-Ohio- 1787, ¶ 14. In its motion for judgment on the pleadings, the Board argued that Mr.

Golec v. Fairview General Hospital

139 Ohio App. 3d 788 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 11, 2000

Brown v. Scioto Cty. Bd. of Commrs. (1993), 87 Ohio App.3d 704, 711 , 622 N.E.2d 1153, 1157 . An appellate court reviewing the grant of summary judgment must follow the standards set forth in Civ.R. 56(C). … David Rapkin, a board certified anesthesiologist, who stated: “Based upon my review of the above captioned matter, I believe within a reasonable degree of medical certainty that Dr.

Pecyk v. Semoncheck

61 Ohio Law. Abs. 465 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 14, 1952

“In Davis v. Brown, 27 Oh St 326, the court said that words, to be actionable per se, must come within one of the following classes: “ T. … Davis v. Brown, 27 Oh St 326, “Words spoken, charging a man with sodomy, are not actionable without alleging special damage; * * *” such an act not then being a crime. See also, Melvin v. Weiant, 36 Oh St 184. Hayner v.