Case law

Mordick v. Dayton

2012 Ohio 289 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 27, 2012

[Cite as Mordick v. Dayton, 2012-Ohio-289.] … Kisil v. Sandusky (1984), 12 Ohio St.3d 30, 34, 12 OBR 26, 30, 465 N.E.2d 848, 852.

Shelton v. Gallia County Veterans Service Commission

194 Ohio App. 3d 80 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 15, 2011

Nye v. … The board has jurisdiction over appeals lodged by “classified” employees only. See Olander v.

Moss v. Lorain Cty. Bd. of Mental Retardation

2016 Ohio 169 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 19, 2016

The Board twice sought judgment on the pleadings, but this Court upheld the trial court’s denial of their motions. Moss v. Lorain Cty. Bd. of Mental Retardation, 185 Ohio App.3d 395, 2009-Ohio-6931, ¶ 33; Moss v. … See Creauro v. Duko, 7th Dist.

Heaton v. Jackson

34 Ohio App. 424 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 10, 1930

And as said in Mathews v. Board of Education of Cuyahoga County, 8 Ohio App., 206 , 30 O. C. … It is held in Hedley v.

State v. Duncan

2013 Ohio 2384 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 10, 2013

Eastley v. Volkman, 132 Ohio St.3d 328, 2012-Ohio-2179, ¶ 10, quoting State v. … State v. Andrews, 3d Dist. No. 1–05–70, 2006-Ohio-3764, ¶ 30, citing State v.

State v. Degraffinreed

2012 Ohio 5166 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 5, 2012

State v. Jenks (1991), 61 Ohio St.3d 259. … State v. Martin (1983), 20 Ohio App.3d 172, 175. See also, State v. Thompkins, 78 Ohio St.3d 380, 1997–Ohio–52.

State ex rel. Wengerd v. Baughman Twp. Bd. of Trustees

2014 Ohio 4749 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 27, 2014

Wengerd v. Baughman Twp. Bd. of Trustees, 2014-Ohio-4749.] … Krueck v. Kipton Village Council, 9th Dist. Lorain No. 11CA009960, 2012-Ohio- 1787, ¶ 14. In its motion for judgment on the pleadings, the Board argued that Mr.

State Ex Rel Brown v. Highland Height P.D., Unpublished Decision (6-5-2000)

Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 5, 2000

Brown, petitioner, is seeking a writ of habeas corpus to secure his release from respondent, the Highland Heights Police Department. … Wynn v. McFaul (1998), 81 Ohio St.3d 193 , 690 N.E.2d 7 ; State ex rel. Sostre v. McFaul (Apr. 24, 2000), Cuyahoga App. No. 77893, unreported.

Diebler v. Denton

49 Ohio App. 2d 303 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 5, 1976

The right of appeal from an order of the Board must be conferred by the Ohio Constitution or by statute. Lindblom v. Bd. of Tax Appeals (1949), 151 Ohio St. 250 , Corn v. … Osborn, v. Jackson, supra., p. 50 .

Highland Farm Ltd. v. Jackson Twp. Bd. of Zoning Appeals

2016 Ohio 4624 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 20, 2016

See Weber v. Troy Twp. Board of Zoning Appeals, 5th Dist. … Cleveland Clinic Foundation v.

Jeffers v. Athens Cty. Commrs.

2011 Ohio 675 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 9, 2011

JEFFERS V. BOARD OF ATHENS COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, FOURTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS, CASE NO. 06CA39.” II. … See State v.

State ex rel. Ames v. Concord Twp. Bd. of Trustees

2026 Ohio 107 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 14, 2026

Ames v. Concord Twp. Bd. of Trustees, 2026-Ohio-107.] … The Concord Township Board of Trustees is the governing board for Concord Township in Lake County, established under R.C. 505.01. During the relevant period, the Board consisted of three trustees: Amy L.

Laituri v. Nero

131 Ohio App. 3d 797 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 4, 1999

Despite the position of our respected colleagues in the Tenth District Court of Appeals, I agree with the contrary analysis of this issue set out by the Ninth District Court of Appeals in Brown v. … At any time after fourteen (14) days from the date of filing of the motion, the assigned judge may rule upon the motion.’ ” Brown at 138 , 610 N.E.2d at 509 .

State, Ex Rel. Thompson v. Clark

7 Ohio App. 3d 191 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 10, 1982

Consequently, relator’s argument that his past record is irrelevant, and has been improperly considered by the board, is without merit. This point is specifically addressed in Jones v. … A similar decision was made in Barnhart v.

Lucchesi v. Fischer, Ca2008-03-023 (11-17-2008)

2008 Ohio 5935 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 17, 2008

Finch v. Kailey Auto Sales, Inc. , Franklin App. Nos. 04AP-371, 04AP-512, 2005-Ohio-1944 , ¶ 14 ; Wiltberger v. Davis (1996), 110 Ohio App.3d 46 . {¶ 5} Likewise, a trial court's decision on whether to impose Civ. … Nakoff v. Fairview Gen.

Meerland Dairy L.L.C. v. Ross Twp., 07ca0083 (5-9-2008)

2008 Ohio 2243 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 9, 2008

Board of Township Trustees v. Funtime (1990), 55 Ohio St.3d 106 . … Board of Township Trustees v. Funtime.

State v. Wright, Unpublished Decision (8-1-2005)

2005 Ohio 3907 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 1, 2005

State v. Brown, 64 Ohio St.3d 476 , 479 , 1992-Ohio-96 . The triple-count provision of R.C. 2945.71 (E) applies only where the defendant is held in jail in lieu of bail solely on the pending charge. State v. … State v.

4747 Mann, L.L.C. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision

2011 Ohio 2593 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 26, 2011

Arts & Dev. v. … Arcadia Acres v. Ohio Dept. of Job & Family Servs., 123 Ohio St.3d 54, 2009-Ohio-4176, 914 N.E.2d 170, ¶12. See, also, Hafiz v.

Pecyk v. Semoncheck

61 Ohio Law. Abs. 465 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 14, 1952

“In Davis v. Brown, 27 Oh St 326, the court said that words, to be actionable per se, must come within one of the following classes: “ T. … Davis v. Brown, 27 Oh St 326, “Words spoken, charging a man with sodomy, are not actionable without alleging special damage; * * *” such an act not then being a crime. See also, Melvin v. Weiant, 36 Oh St 184. Hayner v.

Jacovetty v. Browning Ferris Indus.

2021 Ohio 1400 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 22, 2021

[Cite as Jacovetty v. Browning Ferris Indus., 2021-Ohio-1400.] … Brown v. Gen. Motors Corp., 38 Ohio St.2d 286, 286, 313 N.E.2d 383 (1974). The two-issue rule does not apply.