Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.41s
Elmwood Place Loan & Building Co. v. Cincinnati Concrete Co.
6 Ohio App. 43 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 22, 1915
Brown claims a lien by virtue of. a decree for alimony. … Brown must therefore be held to have a prior lien on the proceeds of said property. Tolerton et al., Exrs., v. Williard et al., 30 Ohio St., 579 . Judgment accordingly. Jones, E. H., P. J., and Gorman, J., concur.
Cited 3 timesPublishedExchange Street Associates, L.L.C. v. Donofrio
187 Ohio App. 3d 241 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 20, 2010
Apostolic Faith Assembly, Inc. v. Coventry Twp., 9th Dist. … Hubbard v.
Cited 8 timesPublishedState Ex Rel. Brunson v. Bedner
28 Ohio App. 2d 63 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 8, 1971
Marshall, v. … Johnson, v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedLanzo v. Campbell City School Dist. Bd. of Edn.
2010 Ohio 4779 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 24, 2010
Graziano v. … Hale v.
Cited 4 timesPublished2022 Ohio 1102 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 31, 2022
Ames v. Pokorny, 2022-Ohio-1102.] … Ames moved to strike the Board’s response and moved for sanctions against the Board for filing a response despite not being party to the instant action. The Board opposed the motion by moving to strike Mr.
Cited 4 timesPublished2022 Ohio 4395 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 8, 2022
State v. Mahon, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 106043, 2018-Ohio-295, ¶ 7, quoting Talty at ¶ 16. In State v. … Id. at ¶ 9, citing Strongsville v. Feliciano, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 96294, 2011-Ohio-5394; accord State v. Brown, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 111173, 2022-Ohio-3233, ¶ 12.
Cited 0 timesPublished79 Ohio App. 315 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 4, 1946
Flanders v. Blandy, supra, at page 113. *319 Counsel for appellants refer to the case of Bolles v. Trust Co., 132 Ohio St., 21 , 4 N. E. (2d), 917, to support their contention. … In the case of Braun v. Brown, 14 Cal. (2d), 346, 94 P. (2d), 348 , 127 A. L. R., 773, it was held, as. reported in paragraphs one and eleven of the headnotes appearing in 127 A. L. R.: “1.
Cited 5 timesPublished2015 Ohio 4115 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 30, 2015
State v. Russell, 2d Dist. Montgomery No. 19901, 2004-Ohio-1700, ¶ 34. See Michigan v. … State v. Reed, 2d Dist.
Cited 0 timesPublished43 Ohio Law. Abs. 417 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 25, 1945
Lahiff v Society, 76 Conn. 648 . Independent Order v Wilks, 98 Miss. 179 . Thompson v Locomotive Engineers, 41 Tex. Civ. Rep. 176. Mystic Order ex rel v Fritter, 61 Oh St 628. 31 Amer. Juris. 865. … Love v Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers, 139 Ark. 375 . Benevolent Assoc. v Benson, 76 Tex. 552 .
Cited 8 timesPublishedOhio Dept. of Taxation v. Barney
2023 Ohio 636 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 2, 2023
Credit Assn. v. … Boddie v.
Cited 4 timesPublished2019 Ohio 2313 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 10, 2019
Officer Kaufman observed a small baggie containing a black or brown rock inside Barnett’s hoodie pocket, which he thought was heroin. (T. 15). … L–14–1083, 2015–Ohio–3081 (state conceded restitution to dog warden for defendant's dogs' boarding and medical expenses was improper; dog warden was not a victim under R.C. 2930.01 [H] ); State v. Samuels, 4th Dist.
Cited 1 timesPublishedMP 11868 Clifton, L.L.C. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision
232 N.E.3d 269 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 21, 2023
Standard of Review It is well established that “[a] party seeking an increase or decrease in valuation bears the burden of proof before a board of revision.” Snavely v. Erie Cty. … Johnson v. Clark Cty.
Cited 1 timesPublishedSworak v. Great Lakes Recreational Vehicle Assn.
2021 Ohio 4309 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 9, 2021
Kirby v. Oatts, 2020-Ohio-301, 151 N.E.3d 1083, ¶ 18 (2d Dist.), quoting State ex rel. Gmoser v. … Id., citing Ohio Power Co. v. Ogle, 4th Dist.
Cited 4 timesPublishedState ex rel. Patrick Bros., A Gen. Partnership v. Putnam Cty. Bd. of Commrs.
2014 Ohio 2717 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 23, 2014
Partnership v. Putnam Cty. Bd. of Commrs., 2014-Ohio- 2717.] … Vermilion Teachers’ Assn. v. Vermilion Local School Dist.
Cited 7 timesPublished91 Ohio App. 28 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 21, 1951
Board of Review, Franklin County, No. 176609; Ohio Seamless Tube Co. v. Millenbaugh, No. 31947, Richland County; In re Claim of Russell C. McKeever, No. 102129, Montgomery County; Thelma Holtkamp Gordon v. … Board of Review, No. A-121258, Hamilton County. For an opinion contra, see Frigidaire Division v. Board of Review, case No. 100794, Montgomery County.
Cited 5 timesPublishedSpirit Master Funding IX, L.L.C. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision
2019 Ohio 1349 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 11, 2019
of Edn. v. Cuyahoga Cty. … The Board of Tax Appeals decision and order to reject Appellant’s unrebutted appraisal evidence on the issue of the unencumbered fee-simple value of the real estate is unreasonable and unlawful. V.
Cited 3 timesPublished2013 Ohio 2688 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 25, 2013
[Cite as State v. Mullins, 2013-Ohio-2688.] … The Defendant’s urine sample was kept in Trooper Brown’s locked patrol cruiser for the remainder of his shift. 6. Trooper Brown got off his shift at 6:00 a.m., on March 25, 2012. 7.
Cited 4 timesPublishedPrinceton City School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. Princeton Assn. of Classroom Educators
2013 Ohio 667 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 27, 2013
Id. at 519-520, citing United Steelworkers of Am. v. Ent. … The board has broad discretion in determining what will be a reasonable reduction in force. Mink v. Great Oaks Inst. of Technology and Career Dev. Bd. of Edn., 1st Dist. No.
Cited 1 timesPublished2025 Ohio 1085 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 28, 2025
He cites State v. Weideman, 2002-Ohio-1484, and State v. Brown, 2015-Ohio-2438, and argues that a balancing test applies to determine the constitutionality of an extraterritorial traffic stop. … See, e.g., State v. Hall, 2018-Ohio- 2321, ¶ 62-64 (2d Dist.); State v. Pierce, 2003-Ohio-7244, ¶ 8-10 (2d Dist.); State v. Creech, 2024-Ohio-5245, ¶ 21-27 (12th Dist.). In a different context, we held in State v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedVolovetz v. Tremco Barrier Solutions, Inc.
2016 Ohio 7707 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 10, 2016
Browning Mfg., 259 Kan. 735, 755 (1996) (holding that a manufacturer's "remedy limitation [was] not directly applicable to [the buyer] because it was not part of the basis of the bargain"); Duffin v. … Auth. v.
Cited 18 timesPublished
Ask Donna