Case law

State v. Mosley

178 Ohio App. 3d 631 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 23, 2008

State v. Blankenship (1988), 38 Ohio St.3d 116, 117 , 526 N.E.2d 816 . {¶ 30} In State v. … Id. at paragraph one of the syllabus. {¶ 33} Most recently, in State v. Brown, 119 Ohio St.3d 447 , 2008-Ohio-4569 , 895 N.E.2d 149 , the Supreme Court of Ohio again revisited its decision in Ranee.

Nelson v. Mohr

2013 Ohio 4506 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 10, 2013

BROWN, J. {¶ 1} Carl A. Nelson, Sr., Terry L. Larson, and Paul W. … R.C. 2967.03 has been construed as "allow[ing] the board to consider any evidence it feels is pertinent to the question of whether the prisoner is fit to be at liberty without harming others." State ex rel. Thompson v.

Clem D's Auto Sales v. Bur. of Motor Vehicles

2014 Ohio 951 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 14, 2014

Patterson v. V & M Auto Body, 63 Ohio St.3d 573, 589 N.E.2d 1306 (1992), quoting Duval v. Midwest Auto City, Inc., 425 F.Supp. 1381, 1387 (D.Neb.1977); State v. Lowman Lumber Co., 2d Dist. … State v. Renner, 2d Dist.

Mt. Pilgrim Baptist Church, Inc. v. Bishop

2015 Ohio 5161 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 11, 2015

v. … Bush v.

Doe v. Upper Arlington Bd. of Edn.

2021 Ohio 3805 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 26, 2021

Ridgeway v. State Med. Bd. of Ohio, 10th Dist. … Co. v. Pub. Util. Comm., 103 Ohio St.3d 398, 2004- Ohio-5466, ¶ 15 (citations omitted). See also, e.g., State v.

Helms v. Summit Cty. Combined Gen. Health Dist.

2017 Ohio 7915 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 29, 2017

This Court, therefore, has recognized that “a health district, and the board of health formed thereunder, is a state agency.” Harrison v. Judge, 9th Dist. … State v. Carney, 9th Dist. Lorain No. 14CA010706, 2016-Ohio-2684, ¶ 5, fn. 1. Accordingly, we reject Mr. Helms’s argument that Section 119.12 did not apply to the Board of Health’s decision. Mr.

Ford v. Ohio Department of Natural Resources

67 Ohio App. 3d 755 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 24, 1990

Pursuant to R.C. 119.12, a common pleas court must affirm the order of the board if the order is supported by reliable, probative and substantial evidence. Univ. of Cincinnati v. … Smock v. Ferguson (Dec. 17, 1981), Franklin App. No. 81AP-677, unreported, 1981 WL 3684 .

State v. Wintermeyer

93 N.E.3d 397 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 27, 2017

Brown at ¶ 22 ; State v. … Kaupp v. Texas , 538 U.S. 626 , 633, 123 S.Ct. 1843 , 155 L.Ed.2d 814 (2003). See also Brown , 422 U.S. at 604 , 95 S.Ct. 2254 .

State, Ex Rel. Krupa v. Green

114 Ohio App. 497 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 24, 1961

Peirce, v. Board of Elections of Stark County, 168 Ohio St., 249 ; State, ex rel. Winterfeld, v. Board of Elections of Lucas County, 167 Ohio St., 531 . … Flynn, v. Board of Elections, 164 Ohio St., 193 . Writ denied. Hurd, J., concurs.

Board of Trustees v. Petro, Unpublished Decision (1-5-2000)

Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 5, 2000

OCLC Online Computer Library Ctr., Inc. v. Kinney (1984), 11 Ohio St.3d 198 , 200 , quoting Battelle Mem. Inst. v. Dunn (1947), 148 Ohio St. 53 , 60 . … Co. v. Kohn (1937), 133 Ohio St. 111 , 113 . However, a nunc pro tunc entry is not appropriate where "it reflects a substantive change in [the] judgment." State ex rel. Litty v.

State v. Washington

2012 Ohio 2117 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 14, 2012

Id. at ¶ 49, quoting State v. Brown, 119 Ohio St.3d 447, 2008-Ohio-4569, ¶ 50 (Lanzinger, J., dissenting). If the answer to both inquiries is yes, the offenses will merge. … See Johnson at ¶ 35 (criticizing the analysis the majority employed in State v. Brown); State v.

Kelso v. Cashen

36 Ohio Law. Abs. 348 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 16, 1942

Technical rules of criminal law do not apply in matters before an administrative board. State, ex rel v Gray, 114 Oh St 275. … The State Barber Board had jurisdiction to suspend the licenses as it did under authority of §1081-1, et seq., GC. See: Jones v Barber Board, 137 Oh St 636.

Michalski v. Fairfield County Board, Unpublished Decision (5-24-1999)

Ohio Court of Appeals · May 24, 1999

In Middletown v. … See Watson v.

Spirit Master Funding IX, L.L.C. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision

2019 Ohio 1349 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 11, 2019

of Edn. v. Cuyahoga Cty. … The Board of Tax Appeals decision and order to reject Appellant’s unrebutted appraisal evidence on the issue of the unencumbered fee-simple value of the real estate is unreasonable and unlawful. V.

Anguiano v. Ohio Dept. of Edn.

2014 Ohio 2810 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 27, 2014

Robinson v. … Bd. of Edn. v. State Bd. of Edn., 63 Ohio St.3d 705, 707, 590 N.E.2d 1240 (1992). But issues of law the appellate court reviews de novo. Bartchy v.

State ex rel. Anderson v. Chambers-Smith

2021 Ohio 3653 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 12, 2021

Pressley v. Indus. … Hattie v. Goldhardt, 69 Ohio St.3d 123, 126 (1994). However, in State ex rel. Keith v.

Beebe v. Colerain Township Board, Unpublished Decision (11-29-2000)

Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 29, 2000

Therefore, the trial court abused its discretion in reversing the board of zoning appeals' determination on abandonment. See R.C. 2506.03 and R.C. 2506.04 ; Dudukovich v. … Trustees v. Buckeye Fireworks and Novelty Co., Inc. (Feb. 20, 1987), Portage App. No. 1599, unreported; Slough v. Selby (May 25, 1983), Butler App. No. CA81-10-0098, unreported; Rolfes v.

OM Harikrushn, L.L.C. v. Summit Cty. Bd. of Revision

2017 Ohio 1028 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 22, 2017

Blakemore v. … of Education v.

In re S.A.-C.

2017 Ohio 9297 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 29, 2017

of Common Pleas, Juvenile Division, that denied his motion for legal custody and instead terminated his parental rights and placed two of his minor children in the permanent custody of Summit County Children Services Board … See Lowry v. Lowry, 48 Ohio App.3d 184, 190 (4th Dist.1988), citing Gries Sports Ents., Inc. v. Cleveland Browns Football Co., Inc., 26 Ohio St.3d 15, 28 (1986).

Temponeras v. State Med. Bd. of Ohio

2014 Ohio 225 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 23, 2014

Our Place, Inc. v. … Lies v. Veterinary Med. Bd., 2 Ohio App.3d 204, 207 (1st Dist.1981), quoting Andrews v. Bd. of Liquor Control, 164 Ohio St. 275, 280 (1955).