Case law

State ex rel. Hayslip v. State Teachers Ret. Sys. Bd.

2021 Ohio 3495 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 30, 2021

Std., Inc. v. Boehler, 99 Ohio St.3d 39, 2003-Ohio-2457, ¶ 29. Mandamus will lie only if the board's decision is not supported by any evidence. State ex rel. Woodman v. Ohio Pub. Emps. … Bruce v.

State v. Board of Elections, Unpublished Decision (9-18-2000)

Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 18, 2000

The Supreme Court denied relief in mandamus and held that the board of elections properly applied R.C. 731.32 . In State ex rel. Bogart v. Cuyahoga Cty. … Russell v.

Royder v. State Medical Board, Unpublished Decision (12-24-2002)

Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 24, 2002

In Huffman v. … Steiner v. Custer (1940), 137 Ohio St. 448 * * *; Conner v. Conner (1959), 170 Ohio St. 85 * * *; Chester Township v. Geauga Co. Budget Comm. (1976), 48 Ohio St.2d 372 . * * *' State v.

Kuntz 2016, L.L.C. v. Montgomery Cty. Auditor

123 N.E.3d 386 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 16, 2018

Bd. of Edn. v. Franklin Cty. … Bd. of Edn., v. Hancock Cty.

Parrott v. State Med. Bd. of Ohio

2016 Ohio 4635 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 28, 2016

No. 14CV-9912) v. … the board's interpretation of the technical and ethical requirements of its profession.' " Weiss v.

Board of Trustees v. Petro, Unpublished Decision (1-5-2000)

Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 5, 2000

OCLC Online Computer Library Ctr., Inc. v. Kinney (1984), 11 Ohio St.3d 198 , 200 , quoting Battelle Mem. Inst. v. Dunn (1947), 148 Ohio St. 53 , 60 . … Co. v. Kohn (1937), 133 Ohio St. 111 , 113 . However, a nunc pro tunc entry is not appropriate where "it reflects a substantive change in [the] judgment." State ex rel. Litty v.

State Ex Rel. Iris Sales Co. v. Voinovich

43 Ohio App. 2d 18 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 23, 1975

In Katzenbach v. McClung (1964), 379 U. … Co, v. Bd. of Tax Appeals, supra.

Maddox v. Greene Cty. Bd. of Commrs.

2014 Ohio 1541 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 11, 2014

[Cite as Maddox v. Greene Cty. … But see Grace v.

Barnett v. Wendt

33 Ohio App. 3d 124 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 30, 1986

The board’s finding that such conduct was violative of the prohibition of having a sexual relationship with an “immediate” ex-client is not unreasonable. See Arlen v. … State (1980), 61 Ohio St. 2d 168 , 15 O.O. 3d 190, 399 N.E. 2d 1251 ; Sterling Drug, Inc. v. Wickham (1980), 63 Ohio St. 2d 16 , 17 O.O. 3d 10, 406 N.E. 2d 1363 ; and State, ex rel. Curry, v. Indus.

Johnson v. Clark Cty. Bd. of Revision

2016 Ohio 7518 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 28, 2016

Bd. of Educ. v. … Bank & Trust Co. v. Reynolds, 2d Dist.

Ohio State Pharmaceutical Assn. v. Wickham

61 Ohio App. 3d 488 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 14, 1989

Wickham, Executive *491 Director of the Ohio State Board of Pharmacy (“director”); National Rx Services, Inc. … In response to an inquiry by the Board of Pharmacy (“board”), the Attorney General concluded in 1982 that construing the statutes to prohibit pharmacists from filling out-of-state prescriptions would be unconstitutional under

State v. Mobley, 22427 (9-12-2008)

2008 Ohio 4641 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 12, 2008

State v. … State v.

In re D.H.

2018 Ohio 630 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 20, 2018

Eastley [v. Volkman, 132 Ohio St.3d 328] at ¶20; quoting Tewarson v. Simon, 141 Ohio App.3d 103, 115, 750 N.E.2d 176 (9th Dist.2001).” In re D.M., 4th Dist. … In re Brown, 7th Dist. Columbiana No. 04 CO 59, 2005-Ohio-4374, ¶49, citing In re Hardy, 7th Dist.

Beebe v. Colerain Township Board, Unpublished Decision (11-29-2000)

Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 29, 2000

Therefore, the trial court abused its discretion in reversing the board of zoning appeals' determination on abandonment. See R.C. 2506.03 and R.C. 2506.04 ; Dudukovich v. … Trustees v. Buckeye Fireworks and Novelty Co., Inc. (Feb. 20, 1987), Portage App. No. 1599, unreported; Slough v. Selby (May 25, 1983), Butler App. No. CA81-10-0098, unreported; Rolfes v.

Fair v. School Employees Retirement System

44 Ohio App. 2d 115 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 1, 1975

In Wolf v. … Plaintiff apparently followed the procedure suggested by Justice Schneider,-in his concurring opinion in Tuber *120 v.

Gillenwater v. Board of Education, Unpublished Decision (10-14-1999)

Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 14, 1999

Columbus v. Grant (1981), 1 Ohio App.3d 96 ; State v. Bayless (1976), 48 Ohio St.2d 73 . In Muzzillo v. Bozza (Dec. 23, 1981), Van Wert App. … See Hara v. Montgomery Cty. Joint Vocational School Dist. (1996), 75 Ohio St.3d 60 , 63 .

State v. Steadman

2019 Ohio 4511 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 4, 2019

[Cite as State v. Steadman, 2019-Ohio-4511.] … Appellant's counsel has filed a brief with this court pursuant to Anders v.

Chambers v. Jenkins, 2007 Ca 00131 (2-11-2008)

2008 Ohio 638 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 11, 2008

. {¶ 53} In Brown v. Mariano , Lorain App. … Brown is distinguishable from the case at bar because in the instant case there was no testimony the accident was so minor as to cause only minor injuries. {¶ 54} The Brown court cited our case of Seymour v.

Huntsman v. State Bd. of Edn., Unpublished Decision (6-21-2004)

2004 Ohio 3258 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 21, 2004

to initiate a certificate revocation proceeding. {¶ 18} "V. … Jones v. State Med. Bd. of Ohio (May 7, 1981), 4 th App. No. 1451, unreported; Bd. of Education v. Cuyahoga Cty.

In re L.C.

2020 Ohio 4629 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 28, 2020

In re A.B., Brown No. … Miller v. Miller, 37 Ohio St.3d 71, 74 (1988).