Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersohioctapp

10,000+ results

2.04s

  • Royse v. City of Dayton

    195 Ohio App. 3d 81 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 15, 2011

    See Resek v. *85 Seven Hills (1983), 9 Ohio App.3d 224 , 9 OBR 395, 459 N.E.2d 566 ; Giannini v. … Haley v.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Montgomery v. Montgomery, 06ap-555 (6-7-2007)

    2007 Ohio 2787 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 7, 2007

    Rose Chevrolet, Inc. v. Adams (1988), 36 Ohio St.3d 17 ; App.R. 9(B) and 10(A). … Knapp v. Edwards Laboratories (1980), 61 Ohio St.2d 197 , 199 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Attorney General v. Hamm

    2026 Ohio 2304 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 18, 2026

    Bd. of Edn. v. Conners, 2012-Ohio-2447, ¶ 8 (“The General Assembly has provided for Ohio’s boards of education under R.C. Chapter 3313”). … Petro v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Elections v. Bardwell

    2025 Ohio 4669 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 9, 2025

    v. Harris, 2024-Ohio-5685, ¶ 10, citing Cincinnati Fed. S. & L. Co. v. McClain, 2022- Ohio-725, ¶ 37. … McCormick v. Hanson Aggregates Southeast, Inc., 164 N.C.App. 459 (2004); Filarsky v. Superior Court, 28 Cal.4th 419 (2002). an advisory opinion from this court.4 A court will not indulge in advisory opinions. Egan v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In Re Ghali

    83 Ohio App. 3d 460 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 5, 1992

    Appellant attempts to distinguish Ohio Dept. of Transp. v. … It is beyond cavil that the board is not a subdivision of the state but an agency of the state. E.g., Bouquett v. Clemmer (S.D.

    Cited 40 timesPublished
  • Ohio Power Co. v. Burns

    176 N.E.3d 778 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 4, 2021

    Norwood v. … Ohio Edison Co. v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • State v. Davis

    2023 Ohio 4351 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 4, 2023

    State v. … State v. Smith, 12th Dist. Clermont No. CA2021-02-009, 2022-Ohio-1984, ¶ 58, citing State v. Reeder, 12th Dist. Clinton Nos.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Palladino v. Steen

    2013 Ohio 1455 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 11, 2013

    [Cite as Palladino v. Steen, 2013-Ohio-1455.] … Luther Hills v. Lucas County Bd. of Revision * * *. Appellant failed to name the Board of Revision as a party to the appeal.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Ames v. Portage Cty. Solid Waste Mgt. Dist. Bd. of Commrs.

    2022 Ohio 2740 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 8, 2022

    Pursuant to R.C. 3734.52(A), the board serves as the SWMD’s board of directors. The board refers to itself as the SWMD board when conducting SWMD business. {¶10} Mr. … Ames v. Pokorny, supra. Mr.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • State v. Johnson

    2017 Ohio 7102 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 4, 2017

    CR0200603545 v. … Citing its decision in State v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Banker's Choice, L.L.C. v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals & Cincinnati

    106 N.E.3d 1271 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 31, 2018

    See Cleveland Clinic Found. v. Cleveland Bd. of Zoning Appeals , 141 Ohio St.3d 318 , 2014-Ohio-4809 , 23 N.E.3d 1161 , ¶ 23, citing Kisil v. … See Garono v. State , 37 Ohio St.3d 171 , 173, 524 N.E.2d 496 (1988) ; see also Faber v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • BMW of N. Am., L.L.C. v. MacLean

    2021 Ohio 2388 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 13, 2021

    own evaluation for the Board's only "to a limited extent * * *," see Univ. of Cincinnati v. … Bd. of Edn. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Bemmes v. Public Employees Retirement System

    102 Ohio App. 3d 782 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 22, 1995

    Seasons Coal Co. v. Cleveland (1984), 10 Ohio St.3d 77, 80 , 10 OBR 408, 410—411, 461 N.E.2d 1273, 1276 ; C.E. Morris Co. v. Foley Constr. … Tulloh v. Goodyear Atomic Corp. (1994), 93 Ohio App.3d 740, 752 , 639 N.E.2d 1203, 1210-1211 , overruled on other grounds, Painter v. Graley (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 377 , 639 N.E.2d 51 .

    Cited 83 timesPublished
  • State v. Hindman

    2023 Ohio 1974 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 15, 2023

    The state acknowledges Brown and concedes the error. Notwithstanding its concession, the state notes a subsequent decision from this court, State v. Fisher, 8th Dist. … Brown, 2019-Ohio-527, 132 N.E.3d 176, Baker, 8th Dist.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • In Re RETAINING VORYS, SATER, SEYMOUR AND PEASE, L.L.P., AS SPECIAL COUNSEL

    192 Ohio App. 3d 357 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 11, 2011

    Gains v. … Bd. v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Beachland Ents., Inc. v. Cleveland Bd. of Rev.

    2013 Ohio 5585 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 19, 2013

    Kelley Co. v. … McCulloch v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • State, Kubacki v. Toledo City School Dist., Unpublished Decision (3-24-2000)

    Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 24, 2000

    FLEMING v. … In their motion for summary judgment, appellants relied on Brown v. Milton-Union Exempted Village Bd. of Edn. (1988), 40 Ohio St.3d 21 , overruled in part by State ex rel. Chavis v. Sycamore City School Dist.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Toledo v. Spiess

    2023 Ohio 1099 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 31, 2023

    THE COURT: This is highly unusual across the board. So, I’m not going to make further comment. … State v. Hunter, 197 Ohio App.3d 689, 2012-Ohio-189, 968 N.E.2d 585 (6th Dist.), ¶ 29; State v. Brown, 8th Dist.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Xenia v. Greene Cty. Bd. of Commrs.

    2019 Ohio 4801 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 22, 2019

    Evans v. … v. Stark Cty.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Dept. of Neighborhood Assistance v. Helms

    2021 Ohio 2667 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 4, 2021

    [Cite as Dept. of Neighborhood Assistance v. Helms, 2021-Ohio-2667.] … “This Court has held that a board enters its final order for purposes of perfecting an appeal when it sends written notification of its decision to the party.” Chapman v. Hous. Appeals Bd., 9th Dist.

    Cited 2 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.