Case law

Millard v. Accountancy Bd. of Ohio

97 N.E.3d 990 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 20, 2017

R.C. 119.12; Our Place, Inc. v. … VanPelt at *2, citing State v. Johnson, 10 Ohio App.3d 14, 16, 460 N.E.2d 625 (10th Dist.1983). {¶20} Millard relies on Doelker v.

State v. Rembert

2025 Ohio 5227 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 20, 2025

He cites State v. Brown, 2019-Ohio-1235, ¶ 39 (8th Dist.), in support of that proposition. Brown, however, concluded that an offender’s conduct underlying the offense can be considered. Id. at ¶ 42. … Brown does not support Rembert’s argument that only the statutory text of the crime may be considered to the exclusion of the underlying acts constituting the crime. See id.; accord State v.

Nardi v. Reliable Trucking Co.

85 Ohio App. 122 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 7, 1948

Kormos v Cleveland Retail Credit Men’s Co. 131 Oh St 471, 3 N. E. (2d) 427; See Matz, Admr. v J. L. Curtis Cartage Company, 132 Oh St 271, 275, 7 N. E. (2d) 220; Swoboda v Brown, 129 Oh St 512, 522, 196 N. … E. 274 ; Simko v Miller, 133 Oh St 345, 13 N. E. (2d) 914; Rohm Admrx v B. F. Goodrich Co. 139 Oh St 141, 146, 38 N. E. (2d) 592; Satterthwaite v Morgan Jr. 141 Oh St 447, 49 N.

State v. Plata

2014 Ohio 449 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 10, 2014

State v. Smith, 12th Dist. Warren Nos. CA2012-02-017 and CA2012-02- 018, 2012-Ohio-4644, ¶ 25, quoting State v. … State v. Barnes, 12th Dist. Brown No. CA2010-06-009, 2011-Ohio-5226, ¶ 81, quoting State v. Walker, 12th Dist. Butler No. CA2006-04-085, 2007-Ohio-911, ¶ 26.

State v. Deckard

213 N.E.3d 800 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 28, 2023

State v. Brown, 2d Dist. Montgomery No. 19804, 2003-Ohio-6533, ¶ 36. {¶ 19} In the present case, however, we see no indicia of criminal activity by Deckard to justify an investigatory detention. … In Brown, 2d Dist. Montgomery No.

State ex rel. Clark-Shawnee Local School Bd. of Edn v. Springfield

2024 Ohio 2483 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 28, 2024

Harm Reduction Ohio v. … Summers v. Fox, 2021-Ohio-2061, ¶ 17.

Werner v. Cincinnati Insurance

77 Ohio App. 3d 232 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 17, 1991

Brown, Judge. … The swing vote in this area has been Justice Brown. Justice Brown concurred in judgment only in the three-one-three decision, Cincinnati Ins. Co. v.

Bedford City Schools Bd. of Edn. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision

2024 Ohio 1894 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 16, 2024

Circuit Courts v. … Nuspl v. Akron & Anderson v. Akron, 61 Ohio St.3d 511, 515, 575 N.E.2d 447 (1991).

State v. Howard, 06ap-1273 (10-23-2007)

2007 Ohio 5659 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 23, 2007

State v. Brown (1984), 12 Ohio St.3d 147 , syllabus. The Ninth District thus held that inconsistent responses to the same count require reversal. State v. Bosley (Oct. 7, 1992), Summit App. No. 15547; State v. … In addressing inconsistent responses to different counts, Browning followed the rule set forth in Griffin v.

State v. Majid

182 Ohio App. 3d 730 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 25, 2009

See United States v. Sherrill (C.A.6, 2004), 388 F.3d 535 ; State v. … THOMAS: I was about to inform the Court that Mr. — is it Brown?

Clipson v. Ohio Department of Industrial Relations

69 Ohio App. 3d 746 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 11, 1990

In determining whether the board’s order was supported by the requisite quantum of evidence, a trial court must, to a limited extent, weigh the evidence. In Univ. of Cincinnati v. … Struthers v. Sokol (1923), 108 Ohio St. 263 , 140 N.E. 519 .

Sate ex rel. Guthrie v. Fender

2021 Ohio 2182 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 28, 2021

State v. … Brown v. Rogers, 72 Ohio St.3d 339, 341, 650 N.E.2d 422 (1995) (“the sentencing order is irrelevant for purposes of the questions presented by this petition”).

Bell v. Mt. Sinai Medical Center

95 Ohio App. 3d 590 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 13, 1994

Fox [1938], 133 Ohio St. 154 , 10 O.O. 218 , 12 N.E.2d 413 ; Browning v. … In State v.

State v. Bennett

234 N.E.3d 629 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 26, 2024

Thus, the trial court erred by denying Bennett a trial by jury. {¶ 11} In coming to this conclusion, we reject the State’s reliance on State v. Brown, 5th Dist. … This conclusion is confirmed by the fact that DeGraft-Biney specifically overruled State v. Stauffer, 48 Ohio St.2d 54, 356 N.E.2d 724 (P. Brown, J., dissenting).

State Ex Rel. Brown v. Lyndhurst Municipal Court, 90912 (2-13-2008)

2008 Ohio 567 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 13, 2008

Brown , Lyndhurst Municipal Court Case No. 07CVG01493, a forcible entry and detainer action. Brown submits that the trial court is without jurisdiction to enforce its judgment, because the case is on appeal. … . {¶ 2} In his prohibition complaint, Brown alleges that he is one of the defendants in the underlying case and that on November 19, 2007, he perfected an appeal of the matter to this court, Greensibs LLC v.

Gupta v. the Lima News

139 Ohio App. 3d 538 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 28, 2000

In Young v. … In Mauk v.

Dalessio v. Williams

111 Ohio App. 3d 192 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 22, 1996

See Browning-Ferris Industries v. Dallas Warehouse Co. (May 7, 1987), Cuyahoga App. … Further, the Crystal Shores Architectural Review Board granted a variance for the Williamses’ garage.

Turner v. State Pers. Bd. of Review, 07ap-888 (4-29-2008)

2008 Ohio 2021 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 29, 2008

Manson v. … Carver v.

In re C.S.

2022 Ohio 2451 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 18, 2022

Brown No. … See Koch v.

State ex rel. Daniels v. Hinkson

2025 Ohio 3058 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 27, 2025

Wilson v. Gulvas, 63 Ohio St.3d 600 (1992). In Wilson, a zoning board official moved out of the township. Id. at 601. … Powers at ¶ 57, citing Hughes v. Brown, 62 Ohio App.3d 417, 421 (10th Dist. 1989).