Case law

State ex rel. Hunt v. Sullivan

8 Ohio Law. Abs. 359 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 30, 1930

PER CURIAM This court has concluded that the power to enter into a lease to commence after the personnel of the Board changes exists in the Board in the absence of an abuse of discretion in the exercise thereof and that when

Crouch v. State

37 Ohio App. 366 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 10, 1930

Milton Crouch was jointly indicted with Darrell Brown and Roy Kennedy under Section 12619, General Code, the indictment containing two counts. … This instruction was directly contrary to the proper practice as stated in Curtis v. State, 113 Ohio St., 187 , 148 N.

Wright v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.

2014 Ohio 4359 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 30, 2014

Co. v. Wuerth, 122 Ohio St.3d 594, 2009-Ohio-3601, ¶ 20; Comer v. … BROWN and DORRIAN, JJ., concur.

State v. Carson

2015 Ohio 4110 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 2, 2015

He stated that some of them are “boarded up; some have boards that are down.” … State v. Brown, 2d Dist. Montgomery No. 25204, 2012-Ohio-5532, ¶ 11.

Stine v. Cent. Ohio Gaming Ventures, L.L.C.

2014 Ohio 2147 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 20, 2014

As the Supreme Court of Ohio stated: "[T]he fact that reasonable minds might reach different conclusions is not a basis for the reversal of the board's decision." Irvine v. Unemp. Comp. … SADLER, P.J., and BROWN, J., concur.

State v. Kaczmarek

2013 Ohio 5658 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 23, 2013

State v. Monroe, 105 Ohio St.3d 384, 2005–Ohio–2282, ¶ 47. Sufficiency is a test of adequacy. State v. … See State v.

State v. Knox

2018 Ohio 43 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 8, 2018

State v. … State v. Brown, 4th Dist. Hocking No. 93CA20, 1994 Ohio App.

Myles v. Johnson, 21600 (6-15-2007)

2007 Ohio 2963 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 15, 2007

Brown v. Scioto Cty. Bd. Of Commrs. (1993), 87 Ohio App.3d 704 , 711 . … Lewis v. Delaware County JVSD , 161 Ohio App.3d 71 , 2005-Ohio-2550 ; Reimund v. Brown (Nov. 2, 1995), Franklin App. No. 95APE04-487; Hackney v. Community Journal (Feb. 21, 1995), Clermont App. No.

Brown v. Westfield National Insurance Co., Unpublished Decision (3-31-1999)

Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 31, 1999

Bank v. Saratoga Apts. (1989), 61 Ohio App.3d 127 , 129 . … This court finds that appellant's reliance on Sachs v. Am. Economy Ins. Co. (1992), 78 Ohio App.3d 440 is inappropriate as that case is clearly distinguishable. In Sachs v. Am. Economy Ins.

Hankins v. Grove-Burgoon Co.

4 Ohio Law. Abs. 831 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 18, 1926

Brown was made a party defendant with leave to intervene and set up a chattel mortgage upon property involved in the receivership. The reply of the receiver denied the validity of Brown’s mortgage. … Attorneys — Owen & Miller and V. H. Gibbs for Brown; R. H. Roberts and J. M. Clifford for Hankins; all of Columbus. 4.

State, Ex Rel. Fontaine v. Hanover Bd, Trustees

18 Ohio App. 3d 23 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 29, 1984

R.C. 971.04 establishes a duty upon the board of township trustees in partition fence proceedings and requires that the board “ * * * shall view the fence or premises where such fence is to be built, and assign, in writing … Mandamus is clearly proper when a board of trustees refuses to exercise its discretion.

Lorain Cnty. Cmty. Coll. v. Ohio Dep't of Jobs & Family Servs.

114 N.E.3d 708 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 11, 2018

Irvine at ¶ 17, quoting Salz v. … Brown read J.M.’s unsworn complaint into the record. Mr.

State v. Taylor

102 N.E.3d 1101 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 28, 2017

See State v. Brown , 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 103427, 2016-Ohio-1546 , 2016 WL 1461495 , ¶ 15, citing State v. Farnese , 4th Dist. … The dissent takes issue that this court does not overrule Brown . The circumstances in Brown are factually distinguishable. In Brown , the court imposed court costs in the defendant's presence at sentencing.

City of Dublin v. State

181 Ohio App. 3d 384 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 12, 2009

[V.] … Brown, J., concurs in judgment only. Sadler, J, concurs in part and dissents in part.

City of Middletown v. McIntosh, Ca2006-07-174 (7-2-2007)

2007 Ohio 3348 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 2, 2007

However, appellee has mischaracterized the holding in Brown. … Consequently Brown is distinguishable, and inapplicable to the instant case, where appellant was unrepresented at his initial appearance. Accord State v. Stewart (Nov. 8, 2001), Coshocton App. No. 01CA002.

Bank of New York v. Wahle

2012 Ohio 6152 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 28, 2012

[Cite as Bank of New York v. Wahle, 2012-Ohio-6152.] … CV 2010 03 2074 v. JOSEPH F. WAHLE, et al.

State v. Bridges

2015 Ohio 4480 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 29, 2015

(Appellant's Brief at 58-60, citing State v. DeLong, 70 Ohio App.3d 402 (10th Dist.1990), which cited Grady v. Corbin, 495 U.S. 508, 516- 21 (1990)); (Reply Brief at 16-17, citing Brown v. Ohio, 432 U.S. 161 (1977)). … I believe the reasoning in Brown v.

Construction Advancement Program of North Central & East Central v. A. Bentley & Sons Co.

45 Ohio App. 2d 13 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 7, 1975

Brown, P. J. … Grundstein v.

Brown v. Quimby Material Handling, Inc., Unpublished Decision (6-15-2000)

Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 15, 2000

(Shover v. Cordis Corp. [1991], 61 Ohio St.3d 213 , 574 N.E.2d 457 , overruled.) 2. … O'Stricker v.

State v. May

111 N.E.3d 48 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 19, 2018

Thompkins at 386, citing Tibbs v. … See Westerville v.