Case law

In re A.H.

2018 Ohio 364 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 29, 2018

State v. Golphin, 81 Ohio St.3d 543, 545 (1998). … See App.R. 12(A)(1)(c); State v. Blatchford, 12th Dist. Preble No. CA2015-12-023, 2016-Ohio-8456, ¶ 71; State v. Scott, 12th Dist. Warren No.

Taylor v. Board, Unpublished Decision (9-22-2000)

Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 22, 2000

At the trial, the defendant, Anthony Board, admitted liability for the rear-end collision, and the proceedings turned entirely, therefore, upon the determination of damages. … State v. DeHass (1967), 10 Ohio St.2d 230 ; State v. Dunlap (1995), 73 Ohio St.3d 308 .

State v. Cutright

2015 Ohio 374 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 29, 2015

State v. Abernathy, 4th Dist. Scioto No. 07CA3160, 2008-Ohio-2949 ¶22-24, quoting Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 30 (1968); see also United States v. … at 300, citing U.S. v. Parsquarille (C.A.6, 1994), 20 F.3d 682, 689. See, also, State v. Summers, 5th Dist. Morgan No. 02CA7, 2002 -Ohio-5284, ¶ 26 citing State v.

In re B.N.R.

2020 Ohio 2852 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 8, 2020

Troxel v. Granville, 530 U.S. 57, 65, 120 S.Ct. 2054, 147 L.Ed.2d 49 (2000). Unless they forfeit the right through specific conduct, “suitable” parents have a “paramount” right to the custody of their minor children. … V. Conclusion {¶ 65} The trial court’s judgment will be affirmed. .............  -23- DONOVAN, J. and WELBAUM, J., concur.

State, Ex Rel. Saltsman v. Burton

91 Ohio App. 271 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 16, 1951

Saltsman, v. Burton, 154 Ohio St., 262 , 95 N. E. (2d), 377. … Frank, v. Meigs County Bd. of Edn., 140 Ohio St., 381 , 44 N.

Gaffin v. Haslam

2024 Ohio 2117 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 30, 2024

State v. Gaffin, 4th Dist. … Co. of Pittsburgh, PA v.

In re Estate of Bohl

2016 Ohio 637 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 22, 2016

Testa v. … Wilhoit v.

Ballard v. Goshen Local Bd. of Edn.

13 Ohio App. 3d 439 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 17, 1984

of the board of education employing said teacher.” … Montgomery, v. Dayton Bd. of Edn. (Aug. 28, 1979), Montgomery App. Nos. 6248 and 6249, unreported.

Brackett v. Moler Raceway Park, L.L.C.

2013 Ohio 1102 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 25, 2013

Zangrondo v. Kuder, 9th Dist. No. 22448, 2006-Ohio-1549, ¶ 10; Kremer v. City of Uhrichsville, 67 Ohio App. 61, 63-64 (5th Dist.1940); Steele v. … Schneble v.

Partin v. Morrison

2015 Ohio 4740 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 16, 2015

McIntyre v. Johnson-Estes, 8th Dist. … See McBride v. McBride, 12th Dist. Butler No.

Adams v. Midtown Obstetrics Gynecology, 08ap-737 (3-31-2009)

2009 Ohio 1564 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 31, 2009

Brown, M.D. ("Dr. Brown") (collectively, "appellees"). … See, e.g., Akers v. Alonzo , 65 Ohio St.3d 422 , 425 , 1992-Ohio-66 ; Allenius v. Thomas (1989), 42 Ohio St.3d 131 , 133-34 ; Hershberger v.

State v. Naff

2019 Ohio 1261 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 5, 2019

[Cite as State v. Naff, 2019-Ohio-1261.] … State v.

State v. Davis

214 N.E.3d 1148 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 17, 2023

Petro, 148 Ohio St. 505 (1947), not State v. Brown,186 Ohio App. 3d, 309, 2010- Ohio-405, nor State v. … . {¶35} Our review of Brown and the cases it relies on revealed that the Brown court applied Petro to recanted witness testimony. The test from Brown was based on an earlier decision, Toledo v.

In re A.L.

2012 Ohio 481 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 8, 2012

Cross Truck v. Jeffries (Feb. 10, 1982), Stark App.No. CA-5758. … See, e.g., In re Brown, Summit App.No. 21004, 2002-Ohio-3405, ¶ 9, citing State v.

State v. Donaldson

2023 Ohio 3538 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 29, 2023

Brown” in the photo array. … State v.

Viola Assocs., L.L.C. v. Lorain Cty. Bd. of Revision

170 N.E.3d 522 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 29, 2021

Brown v. Levin, 10th Dist. Franklin No. 11AP-349, 2012-Ohio-5768, ¶ 38. {¶50} The Firelands BOE’s ninth assignment of error is overruled. … Funtime, Inc. v.

State v. Rau

65 Ohio App. 3d 478 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 4, 1989

Milnark v. … State v. Warnick, Nov. 11, 1975, Summit App. No. 7830, unreported.

Andreyko v. City of Cincinnati

145 Ohio App. 3d 365 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 27, 2001

Board of Trustees responded by recommending to its co-defendant-appellant, Cincinnati, that other employees who had participated in public retirement systems should also be allowed to purchase credit in C.R.S. … that the classification was necessary to promote a compelling government interest. 2 Finding that no compelling governmental interest had been advanced by the city, the court ruled in Andrey-ko’s favor, and the city and board

Shelby Assn. Support Staff v. School District Bd., 06ca86 (3-21-2008)

2008 Ohio 1388 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 21, 2008

The court found that there was no fundamental right to an elected school board. See also Mixon v. … Connors v.

Bising v. Cincinnati

13 Ohio Law. Abs. 671 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 4, 1932

Counsel cite: Berry et v City of Columbus, 104 Oh St, 607; State ex Osborne, etc. v Williams, 111 Oh St, 400; and State ex Toledo v Cooper, Auditor, 97 Oh St, 86. … It has been decided by the Supreme Court of Ohio in the case of Bashore v Brown, Treasurer, 108 Oh St, 18, that the provision of law giving the owner the right to file objections to assessments “furnish the owner an adequate