Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersohioctapp

10,000+ results

0.74s

  • Westlake v. VWS, Inc.

    2014 Ohio 1833 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 1, 2014

    Marion Family YMCA v. … Brown v. Columbus All-Breed Training Club, 152 Ohio App.3d 567, 2003-Ohio-2057, 789 N.E.2d 648, ¶ 18 (10th Dist.). A contract is ambiguous if it is “susceptible to more than one reasonable interpretation.” Michael A.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Browning v. Browning

    2012 Ohio 2158 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 14, 2012

    Browning v. Browning, 2012-Ohio-2158.] … Browning v. Browning, 2012-Ohio-2158.]

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Pet Supplies Plus, Unpublished Decision (8-26-1999)

    Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 26, 1999

    OPINION Plaintiff-appellant Victoria Brown appeals from the decision of the Mahoning County Common Pleas Court which granted summary judgment in favor of defendant-appellee Pet Supplies Plus. … Simmers v. Bentley Constr. Co. (1992), 64 Ohio St.3d 642 , 644 ; Paschal, supra at 203 204; Sidle v. Humphrey (1968), 13 Ohio St.2d 45 , 48-49 .

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Basinger v. York

    2012 Ohio 2017 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 2, 2012

    “The Court erred as they denied rendering any judgment for the boarding of a hog, that belonged to the plaintiff[,] since plaintiff moved out and discontinued involvement of feed or medical care for such hog.” And V. … Brown v. E. Ohio Gas Co., 8th Dist. No. 96815, 2011-Ohio-6443, ¶ 6, citing State ex rel. White v. Cuyahoga Metro. Hous.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Esselburne v. Ohio Department of Agriculture

    49 Ohio App. 3d 37 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 25, 1988

    Compare Bispeck v. Bd. of Commrs. of Trumbull Cty. (1988), 37 Ohio St. 3d 26, 30-31 , 523 N.E. 2d 502, 507 . … Griffith v. Dept. of Youth Services (1985), 28 Ohio App. 3d 76, 77 , 28 OBR 117, 119, 502 N.E. 2d 239, 241 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State v. Thomas

    241 N.E.3d 368 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 11, 2024

    (“Officer Brown-Kirby”). … In addition, the court noted that in State v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • 6800 Avery Rd., L.L.C. v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Revision

    107 N.E.3d 220 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 6, 2018

    "When a party appeals a board of revision's decision, the appellant, whether a taxpayer or a board of education, bears the burden of proving its right to a reduction or increase in the board of revision's determination of … See Tokles & Son, Inc. v. Midwestern Indem.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Buckeye Power, Inc. v. Korleski

    183 Ohio App. 3d 179 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 12, 2009

    CLUB 3000 v. Jones, 10th Dist. No. 07AP-593, 2008-Ohio-5058 , 2008 WL 4416663 , ¶ 28, quoting Citizens Commt. v. … Bryant and Brown, JJ., concur. 1 . The issue of whether a denial of an exemption request is reviewable has yet to be decided by this court.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • State v. Rivera

    2026 Ohio 2209 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 12, 2026

    State v. … State v. Strietelmeier, 2022-Ohio-2370, ¶ 7 (1st Dist.), quoting State v. Staley, 2021-Ohio-3086, ¶ 10 (1st Dist.). It concerns the plaintiff’s burden of persuasion. State v. Brown, 2025-Ohio-2351, ¶ 17 (1st Dist.).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State, Ex Rel. Williams v. Glander

    80 Ohio App. 527 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 28, 1946

    State v Henderson, 38 Oh St 644. The rule is well established in Ohio that the interest of a citizen is sufficient to sustain an action in mandamus. State v Brown, 38 Oh St 344; 25 O. … Parrott v Board of Public Works, 36 Oh St 409; State, ex rel. Atty. Gen’l. v Cincinnati, 37 Oh St 157. Decided September 17th, 1946 In 37 O.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Fostoria v. Flinders

    2020 Ohio 4263 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 31, 2020

    However, The Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Supreme Court of Ohio has exclusive jurisdiction over the alleged misconduct of judges. Barton v. Barton, 2d Dist. … Greene No. 2015-CA-53, 2016-Ohio-5264, ¶ 31, citing Brown v. Weidner, 3d Dist. Seneca No. 13-06-08, 2016-Ohio-6852, ¶¶ 17-18.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Patton v. State ex rel. Hershey

    14 Ohio App. 64 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 11, 1919

    When the board of education of a rural school district suspends a school therein, what children of school age residing in the territory of the. suspended district shall be transported to another school ? … the transportation for pupils living less than two miles from the school house by the nearest practicable route for travel accessible to such pupils shall be optional with the board of education.”

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Myers

    143 Ohio App. 3d 342 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 18, 2001

    McCray v. Illinois (1967), 386 U.S. 300 , 87 S.Ct. 1056 , 18 L.Ed.2d 62 ; State v. Williams (1983), 4 Ohio St.3d 74 , 4 OBR 196, 446 N.E.2d 779 ; State v. … While defendant cites Illinois v. Gates for this proposition, his argument actually advances a version of the Aguilar-Spinelli test. See Aguilar v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Ohio Farmers Ins. v. Bd. of Cty. Comm'rs. of Stark Cty., 08ap-892 (5-5-2009)

    2009 Ohio 2163 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 5, 2009

    ("TAB"), the Board of Commissioners of Stark County and Stark County Engineer ("Stark County"). … Denham v. New Carlisle (1999), 86 Ohio St.3d 594 , 596 , citing Chef Italiano Corp. , at 88. In Noble v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Jones

    2020 Ohio 857 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 9, 2020

    State v. Jenks, 61 Ohio St.3d 259 (1991), paragraph two of the syllabus. This test "requires a determination as to whether the state has met its burden of production at trial." State v. Boles, 12th Dist. Brown No. … State v. Morgan, 12th Dist. Butler Nos.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Seminatore v. Medical Mutual of Ohio

    136 Ohio App. 3d 758 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 17, 2000

    Murphy v. Reynoldsburg (1992), 65 Ohio St.3d 356 , 604 N.E.2d 138 . In Dresher v. … Brown v. Scioto Bd. of Commrs. (1993), 87 Ohio App.3d 704 , 622 N.E.2d 1153 . An appellate court reviewing the grant of summary judgment must follow the standards set forth in Civ.R. 56(C).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Guysinger v. Chillicothe Bd. of Zoning Appeals

    66 Ohio App. 3d 353 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 13, 1990

    The trial court erred to the prejudice of appellants in not finding that the board of zoning appeals failed to give proper notice of its decision to appellants. “V. … Zier v. Bureau of Unemp. Comp. (1949), 151 Ohio St. 123 , 38 O.O. 573 , 84 N.E.2d 746 , at paragraph one of the syllabus; McCruter v.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • State v. Ealy

    2016 Ohio 1185 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 22, 2016

    Brown, 9th Dist. … TYACK and BROWN, JJ., concur. _________________

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • State v. Board, Unpublished Decision (5-19-2004)

    2004 Ohio 2509 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 19, 2004

    State v. … Board's motion to withdraw his guilty pleas was not arbitrary, unreasonable, or unconscionable. See State ex rel. v. Cos., 81 Ohio St.3d at 469 .

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • State v. White, 06ap-607 (6-21-2007)

    2007 Ohio 3217 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 21, 2007

    State v. Thompkins (1997), 78 Ohio St.3d 380 , 678 N.E.2d 541 . … . {¶ 30} Based on this evidence, a rational trier of fact could have found appellant guilty of carrying a concealed weapon because she acted in concert with Brown in the commission of the offense. See State v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.