Case law

State v. Board, Unpublished Decision (6-13-2005)

2005 Ohio 2892 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 13, 2005

State v. … State v.

State, Ex Rel. Williams v. Glander

80 Ohio App. 527 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 28, 1946

State v Henderson, 38 Oh St 644. The rule is well established in Ohio that the interest of a citizen is sufficient to sustain an action in mandamus. State v Brown, 38 Oh St 344; 25 O. … Parrott v Board of Public Works, 36 Oh St 409; State, ex rel. Atty. Gen’l. v Cincinnati, 37 Oh St 157. Decided September 17th, 1946 In 37 O.

State v. Estep, 13-07-14 (12-10-2007)

2007 Ohio 6554 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 10, 2007

See State v. Carter and Strickland v. … However, departments of human services and children's services boards are required to keep records and reports of alleged child-abuse or neglect confidential. Johnson v.

Missionaries of the Sacred Heart, Inc. v. Ohio Dept. of Youth Servs.

2020 Ohio 5596 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 8, 2020

In Sheridan v. Columbia Local School Dist. Bd. of Edn., N.D.Ohio No. 1:18 CV 1162 (May 24, 2019),3 a high school teacher sued the local school board alleging various forms of tortious conduct, including defamation. … BROWN and LUPER SCHUSTER, JJ., concur. ________________

Meranda Nixon Estate Wine, L.L.C. v. Cherry Fork Farm Supply Co.

243 N.E.3d 576 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 22, 2024

Varnau v. Wenninger, 12th Dist. Brown No. CA2009-02-010, 2011-Ohio-3904, ¶ 7, citing Spier v. American Univ. of the Caribbean, 3 Ohio App.3d 28, 29 (1st Dist.1981). … Gallagher v. Cleveland Brown Football Co., 74 Ohio St.3d 427, 433 (1996). See also Horvath v.

In re M.A.

2019 Ohio 829 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 11, 2019

State v. Phillips, 12th Dist. Clinton No CA2009-03-001, 2010-Ohio-2711, ¶ 38, citing State v. … State v. Reynolds, 12th Dist. Madison No. CA2018-02-005, citing State v. Moxley, 12th Dist. Madison No.

Westlake v. VWS, Inc.

2014 Ohio 1833 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 1, 2014

Marion Family YMCA v. … Brown v. Columbus All-Breed Training Club, 152 Ohio App.3d 567, 2003-Ohio-2057, 789 N.E.2d 648, ¶ 18 (10th Dist.). A contract is ambiguous if it is “susceptible to more than one reasonable interpretation.” Michael A.

In re J.R.

2025 Ohio 2271 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 30, 2025

Missouri v. Frye, 566 U.S. 134 (2012); Lafler v. Cooper, 566 U.S. 156 (2012). … - 10 -  Brown CA2024-09-008 See State v.

State v. Allen

2012 Ohio 1831 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 26, 2012

State v. … State v. Brown, 11th Dist. No. 2003-A-0092, 2005-Ohio-2879, at ¶ 80.

State v. Baker

87 Ohio App. 3d 186 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 14, 1993

State v. DePew (1988), 38 Ohio St.3d 275, 277 , 528 N.E.2d 542, 547 ; State v. Fanning (1982), 1 Ohio St.3d 19, 20 , 1 OBR 57, 57-58, 437 N.E.2d 583, 584 ; State v. … This case, however, does not fit into the fact pattern of Brown . 2 . The defendants rely on State v.

Brown v. Lear Operations Corporation, Unpublished Decision (9-30-1999)

Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 30, 1999

Brown, was employed as a machine operator with appellee, the Lear Corporation. … The court in Metheney v.

State, Ex Rel. Coleman v. Munger

84 Ohio App. 148 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 17, 1948

Spahr v. Brown, 19 Oh Ap 107, 110; State, ex rel. Dacek, v. Clev. Trinidad Paving Co., 35 Oh Ap 118, 124; 39 O. Jur. page 22; 52 Am. Jur. page 15. … While the law gives the Commissioners the authority to waive irregularities or requirements as to the'form of bids (Ross v. Board of Education, 42 Oh St 374, 379; State, ex. rel. Ayers v. Green, 22 C. C. N.

Gunn v. Euclid City School Dist. Bd. of Edn.

51 Ohio App. 3d 41 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 5, 1988

Turnik v. Cleveland (May 22, 1986), Cuyahoga App. No. 50390, unreported, at 4. See, also, Gray v. Toledo (May 15, 1987), Lucas App. No. L-86-113, unreported. … Relations Bd. v. Bedford Heights (1987), 41 Ohio App. 3d 21 , 534 N.E. 2d 115 ; In re Bedford Heights (July 24, 1987), SERB 87-016, affirmed (Cuyahoga C.P. 1987), 1987 SERB Official Rptr. 4-57; Perrysburg Bd. of Edn. v.

Nucklos v. State Med. Bd. of Ohio, 08ap-510 (11-4-2008)

2008 Ohio 5698 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 4, 2008

In Ridgeway v. State Med. Bd. of Ohio , Franklin App. No. 06AP-1197, 2007-Ohio-5657 , a physician opined by letter to the Board that Dr. *Page 3 Ridgeway suffered from alcoholism. In response to the letter, Dr. … Ridgeway , at ¶ 12, citing Vogelsong v. Ohio State Bd. of Pharmacy (1997), 123 Ohio App.3d 260 , 267 , and Angerman v. State Med. Bd. of Ohio (Feb. 27, 1990), Franklin App.

State v. Hull

2017 Ohio 7934 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 29, 2017

Id. at ¶ 8-9. {¶ 12} Hull also likens the present case to State v. Brown, 3d Dist. … See State v. Brown, 3d Dist. Seneca No. 13-15-06, 2015-Ohio-3402, ¶ 12. .......... Copies mailed to: Andrew Pickering Victoria Bader Hon. Richard J. O’Neill

Ferrara v. Liberty Twp. Zoning Bd. of Appeals

109 N.E.3d 41 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 4, 2018

Henley v. … Cleveland Clinic Found. v.

Brown v. Pet Supplies Plus, Unpublished Decision (8-26-1999)

Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 26, 1999

OPINION Plaintiff-appellant Victoria Brown appeals from the decision of the Mahoning County Common Pleas Court which granted summary judgment in favor of defendant-appellee Pet Supplies Plus. … Simmers v. Bentley Constr. Co. (1992), 64 Ohio St.3d 642 , 644 ; Paschal, supra at 203 204; Sidle v. Humphrey (1968), 13 Ohio St.2d 45 , 48-49 .

State v. Schmidt

100 Ohio App. 3d 167 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 13, 1995

In State v. … State v. Jenks (1991), 61 Ohio St.3d 259, 273 , 574 N.E.2d 492, 503 .

State v. Thomas

241 N.E.3d 368 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 11, 2024

(“Officer Brown-Kirby”). … In addition, the court noted that in State v.

Sharon Enterprises, Inc. v. Kenworth of Cincinnati, Inc.

131 Ohio App. 3d 746 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 31, 1998

The court shall thereupon direct the board of appraisers of the conservancy district to appraise said damages and injuries, and to make a report to the court * * *. … Hildebrandt, P.J., Gorman and Marianna Brown Bettman, JJ., concur. 1 . We have sua sponte removed this cause from the accelerated calendar. 2 . Kenworth is not a party to this appeal.