Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersohioctapp

10,000+ results

1.06s

  • Nihiser v. Hocking Cty. Bd. of Commrs.

    2013 Ohio 3849 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 30, 2013

    See Brown v. Scioto Cty. Bd. of Commrs., 87 Ohio App.3d 704, 711, 622 N.E.2d 1153 (1993); Morehead v. Conley, 75 Ohio App.3d 409, 411-412, 599 N.E.2d 786 (1991). … Elston at ¶ 10; see also Hortman v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State, Ex Rel. Lloyd v. Hurd

    1 Ohio App. 2d 447 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 16, 1964

    See City of Franklin v. Harrison, 171 Ohio St. 329 . … Brown, P. J., and Jones, J., concur.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Ewart v. State Teachers Retirement Sys. Bd.

    2019 Ohio 2459 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 20, 2019

    Wegman v. … BROWN and LUPER SCHUSTER, JJ., concur. _____________

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Huang v. Lanxide Thermocomposites, Inc.

    144 Ohio App. 3d 289 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 18, 2001

    Gries Sports Enterprises, Inc. v. Cleveland Browns Football Co., Inc. (1986), 26 Ohio St.3d 15, 20 , 26 OBR 15, 16-17, 496 N.E.2d 959, 964 ; see, also, Aronson v. Lewis (Del. 1984), 473 A.2d 805, 812 . 7 . … Aronson v. Lewis (Del.1984), 473 A.2d 805 , 812 12 . Paramount Communications, Inc. v. QVC Network Inc. (Del.1994), 637 A.2d 34, 42 . 13 . Id. at 45 . 14 . Id. at 48 , citing Revlon, Inc. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In re Lauer

    8 Ohio App. Unrep. 124 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 1, 1990

    State (1964), 177 Ohio St. 55 , and Lorms v. State (1976), 48 Ohio St. 2d 153 . … (See McKenzie v. Racing Comm. [1966], 5 Ohio St. 2d 229, 231 .)"

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Frye v. Am. Honda Motor Co., Inc.

    2022 Ohio 878 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 21, 2022

    City of Akron v. Brown, 9th Dist. Summit No. 28629, 2018-Ohio-4500, ¶ 6. … Entertainment, Inc. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State, Ex Rel. Pecyk v. Greene

    102 Ohio App. 297 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 19, 1953

    In the case of Reutener v. … Our Supreme Court in Fitzgerald v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Potter v. Rets Tech Center, Co., Inc., 22012 (3-7-2008)

    2008 Ohio 993 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 7, 2008

    Brown v. Scioto Cty. Bd. … Yeager v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • State v. Metz

    2019 Ohio 4054 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 3, 2019

    V. … State v.

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • Hofer v. Village of N. Perry Bd. of Zoning, 2007-L-165 (12-26-2008)

    2008 Ohio 6876 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 26, 2008

    .) {¶ 24} "(c) The `parties of interest' who shall be notified of the hearing on appeal to the Board of Zoning Appeals shall include: (i) the applicant for the zoning permit; (ii) the person grieved who appealed to the Board … to commercial, and advises the board, on the record, that if the decision of the board is adverse to him he intends to appeal from the decision to a court, has the right of appeal to the Common Pleas Court if the appeal is

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Law v. Lake Metroparks, Unpublished Decision (12-29-2006)

    2006 Ohio 7010 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 29, 2006

    In Brown , the plaintiffs sought title to land, through adverse possession, owned by the board of education. … Brown v. Scioto Bd. of Commrs. (1993), 87 Ohio App.3d 704 , 712 , citing Restatement of the Law 2d, Torts (1979), 87, Section 821B.

    Cited 6 timesUnpublished
  • Johnson v. Baldrick, Ca2007-01-013 (4-14-2008)

    2008 Ohio 1794 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 14, 2008

    The trial court based its holding on this court's decisions in Jackson v. Butler County Board of City Commissioners (1991), 76 Ohio App.3d 448 , 454 , and Poe v. Hamilton (1990), 56 Ohio App.3d 137 , 138 . … Erie County Dept. of Human Resources (1995), 106 Ohio App.3d 88 , 93 ; Douglass v. Salem Community Hospital , 153 Ohio App.3d 350 , 2003-Ohio-4006 , ¶ 46 ; Hite v. Brown (1995), 100 Ohio App.3d 606 , 616 ; Grimm v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • In Re Appropriation for Hwy. Purposes of Land of Seas

    15 Ohio App. 2d 55 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 3, 1968

    BrowN, J. This is an appeal in a highway appropriation case by the Director of Highways from a final judgment entered on a jury verdict for the property owners, L. … Brown, J., of the Sixth Appellate District, sitting by designation in the Third Appellate District. 1 304 P. 2d 257 was reversed by the California Supreme Court in the County of Los Angeles v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Hudak v. State Emp. Relations Bd.

    2013 Ohio 2679 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 25, 2013

    Browning-Ferris Inds. of Ohio, Inc., 15 Ohio St.3d 321, 474 N.E.2d 271 (1984). A fact is material if it affects the outcome of the case under the applicable substantive law. Russell v. … Grady v. State Emp.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Piepho v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Revision

    2014 Ohio 2908 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 30, 2014

    Bd. of Revision v. … BROWN and DORRIAN, JJ., concur.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Legacy Academy for Leaders v. Mt. Calvary Pentecostal Church

    2013 Ohio 4214 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 26, 2013

    Bell v. … KLATT, P.J., and BROWN, J., concur. T.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • State v. Fryer

    2015 Ohio 4573 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 2, 2015

    of the board’s authority to so impose a prison term. … Brown, 167 Ohio App.3d 239, 2006-Ohio-3266, 854 N.E.2d 583, ¶ 7. {¶39} Fryer's fourth assignment of error is overruled.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • State ex rel Bryan v. State Teachers Retirement Sys. Bd. of Ohio

    2016 Ohio 5802 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 13, 2016

    No. 15CV-4292) v. … Menz v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • United Auto Workers of Am. v. State Emp. Relations Bd.

    2013 Ohio 4204 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 26, 2013

    However, with respect to whether the board's order was in accordance with law, this court exercises plenary review. Univ. Hosp., Univ. of Cincinnati College of Medicine v. State Emp. … Galbraith v. Indus. Comm., 10th Dist.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Merritt v. Minshall

    10 Ohio Law. Abs. 620 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 2, 1931

    As we view this case the requirements of §7749-1 GC are mandatory upon the defendant members of the board when and if the requisite steps therein provided are taken by the County Board. … See State ex rel v. Beamer, 109 Oh St 148. The constitutionality of the sections challenged by the second defense of the answer has been passed upon in Lichty v Board of Education, 35 Oh- Ap 81, wherein it is approved.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.