Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersohioctapp

10,000+ results

1.19s

  • State v. Brown, Unpublished Decision (2-27-1998)

    Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 27, 1998

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • State v. Brown, Unpublished Decision (6-15-2005)

    Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 15, 2005

    See State v. Brewster, 1st Dist. Nos. C-030024 and C-030025, 2004-Ohio-2993, at ¶ 6 . Brown filed her motion to suppress on June 4, 2003. … See State v. Wamsley (1991), 71 Ohio App.3d 607 , 594 N.E.2d 1123 ; State v. Wiest.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • State v. Brown, Unpublished Decision (9-21-2005)

    2005 Ohio 4946 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 21, 2005

    State v. … The record shows no evidence or claim of constitutional or statutory violations of Brown's rights. If the trial court determined the State's motion should be denied, then it should have proceeded to trial. See State v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • State v. Brown, Unpublished Decision (4-18-2005)

    2005 Ohio 1796 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 18, 2005

    In the Matter of Brown (1992), 586 N.Y.S.2d 607 . Appellant was never admitted to practice law in Ohio. See Disciplinary Counsel v. Brown (1992), 61 Ohio Misc.2d 792 ; see also, Disciplinary Counsel v. … State v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • State v. Brown, Unpublished Decision (2-13-1998)

    Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 13, 1998

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Nalluri v. Jones

    2020 Ohio 4280 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 1, 2020

    Corp. v. Kegler, Brown, Hill & Ritter Co., L.P.A., S.D.Ohio No. 2:04-cv-494 (Sept. 4, 2007), is also misplaced. … Corp. v. Kegler, Brown, Hill & Ritter Co.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Hostetter v. Muskingum Watershed Conservancy District

    58 Ohio App. 161 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 2, 1938

    Bentley & Sons Co., v. Pierce, Aud., 96 Ohio St., 44 , 117 N. E., 6 . … Walsh v. Barron, Treas., 61 Ohio St., 15 , 55 N. E., 164 , 76 Am. St. Rep., 354 ; Chamberlain v. City of Cleveland, 34 Ohio St., 551 . As we stated in the opinion in the case of Muskingum Watershed Conservancy Dist. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Springfield Local School District Board of Education v. Ohio Ass'n of Public School Employees, Local 530

    106 Ohio App. 3d 855 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 18, 1995

    In this summary judgment proceeding, the burden was on the board to produce evidence that its discussions fell within the exception. See State ex rel. Bond v. … Broadcasting Co. v. Cleveland (1988), 38 Ohio St.3d 79 , 526 N.E.2d 786 , paragraph two of the syllabus. The board claimed that R.C. 121.22(G)(4) applied.

    Cited 33 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown, Unpublished Decision (11-24-2004)

    2004 Ohio 6295 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 24, 2004

    State v. … Accord State v. Williams, Cuyahoga App.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • State v. Sullivan

    2017 Ohio 2943 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 23, 2017

    Record Publishing Co. v. Kainrad, 49 Ohio St.3d 296, 301 (1990), quoting Walker v. … BROWN and KLATT, JJ., concur.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Martin v. Church

    64 Ohio App. 2d 192 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 24, 1979

    Craft v. Shroyer (1947), 81 Ohio App. 253 , 272-273 and 275. … Commerce National Bank v. Browning (1952), 158 Ohio St. 54 . We find no contrary intent of the testator here.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Martin v. Tuscarawas Cty. Bd. of Elections

    2019 Ohio 4236 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 11, 2019

    The Ohio Supreme Court recently addressed the issue of printed versus a cursive signature on a Nominating Petition in Village of Georgetown v. Brown Cty. … Crowl v. Delaware Cty.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown, Unpublished Decision (1-6-2005)

    2005 Ohio 21 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 6, 2005

    Brown filed a motion to dismiss the charge, citing to our decision in State v. Thompson, Cuyahoga App. … In State v. Thompson, 102 Ohio St.3d 287 , 2004-Ohio-2946 , the supreme court held that the date of the underlying offense is irrelevant to the crime of escape.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • State v. Brown, Unpublished Decision (10-3-2005)

    2005 Ohio 5294 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 3, 2005

    . {¶ 2} Counsel for defendant-appellant, Dwayne Brown, filed a brief with this court pursuant to Anders v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • State ex rel. Fair Hous. Opportunities of Northwest Ohio v. Ohio Fair Plan

    2022 Ohio 385 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 10, 2022

    On brief: Crabbe Brown & James, LLP, Larry H. James, and Natalie P. Bryans, for respondent. … Crabbe Brown & James, LLP, Larry H. James, and Natalie P. Bryans, for respondent.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Clark Cty. Bd. of Commrs. v. Coppess, 06-Ca-125 (6-13-2008)

    2008 Ohio 2879 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 13, 2008

    Brown v. Scioto Cty. Bd. … State v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown, Unpublished Decision (12-23-2005)

    2005 Ohio 6828 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 23, 2005

    . {¶ 2} We affirmed Brown's conviction and sentence on May 23, 2003. On December 10, 2004, Brown filed a "Motion for Modification of Sentence, R.C. 2929.51." … State v. Addison (1987), 40 Ohio App.3d 7 , 8 , 530 N.E.2d 1335 . "Once a sentence has been executed, the trial court no longer has the power to modify the sentence except as provided by the legislature." Id.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • City of Cleveland v. Thomas

    15 Ohio App. 76 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 5, 1921

    Augusta, 25 Gra., 386; Water Commrs. v. Brown, 32 N. J. L., 504; McClain v. McKisson, 15 C. C., 517; Braman v. Elyria, 5 C. C. (N. S.), 387, aff. in 73 Ohio St., 346 ; Yaryan v. Toledo, 8 C. C. (N. … Memphis Railroad, 10 Wall., 38 ; Stoddart v. Galman, 22 Vt., 568 ; Cox v. Mount Tabor, 41 Vt., 28 ; Estey v. Starr, 56 Vt., 690 ; Capital Ptg. Co. v. Hoey, 124 N. C., 767 .

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • A.W. v. Twinsburg Bd. of Edn.

    2024 Ohio 2486 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 28, 2024

    McConnell v. … TYRESHA BROWN O’NEAL and LON’CHERIE BILLINGSLEY, Attorneys at Law, for Defendants.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown, Unpublished Decision (12-15-2004)

    Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 15, 2004

    Brown concedes that the police had probable cause to believe that he was transporting heroin, and he acknowledges the general exception to the warrant requirement for automobiles. See Maryland v. … Id. at 467 , 119 S.Ct. 2013 , quoting Pennsylvania v. Labron (1966), 518 U.S. 938 , 940 , 116 S.Ct. 2485 (ellipsis in original). Brown's first assignment of error is, therefore, overruled.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.