Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersohioctapp

10,000+ results

2.24s

  • State Ex Rel. Berquist v. Board of Trustees of Ohio Police & Fire Pension Fund

    174 Ohio App. 3d 516 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 28, 2008

    Blakemore v. … The pension fund board abuses its discretion when it acts in an arbitrary, capricious, or unconscionable manner. State ex rel. Worrell v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Foxfire Village Condominium Unit Owners' Assn. v. Meyer

    2014 Ohio 3339 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 31, 2014

    Brown v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr., 10th Dist. No. 12AP-891, 2013-Ohio-4207, ¶ 16, citing ABN AMRO Mtge. Group, Inc. v. Roush, 10th Dist. … Brown v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab & Corr., 10th Dist. No. 12AP-891, 2013-Ohio-4207, ¶ 20, citing Stevens v. Ohio Dept. of Mental Health, 10th Dist. No. 12AP-1015, 2013-Ohio-3014, ¶ 11, citing Harless v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Harrison Hills Teachers Assn. v. State Emp. Relations Bd.

    2016 Ohio 4661 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 17, 2016

    Carey v. Brown, 447 U.S. 455, 100 S.Ct. 2286, 65 L.Ed.2d 263 (1980). The Court applied Mosley and invalidated the statute. Id. at 463-469. … Brown, 447 U.S. 455, 100 S.Ct. 2286, 65 L.Ed.2d 263.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Rossiter v. Ohio State Med. Bd.

    155 Ohio App. 3d 689 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 15, 2004

    In Our Place, Inc. v. … See, also, Hale v. Ohio State Veterinary Med.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Ferber v. Bd. of Trustees of Berlin Twp.

    47 Ohio App. 449 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 15, 1933

    or carelessness of said Board of Trustees in the discharge of its official duties.” … A board of township trustees has little use for a road roller except in making and maintaining roads.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State ex rel Ames. v. Portage Cty. Bd. of Commrs.

    2017 Ohio 4237 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 12, 2017

    Temple v. … Brown v. Cty. Commrs. of Scioto Cty., 87 Ohio App.3d 704, 711 (4th Dist.1993) (citation omitted); see also Grafton v. Ohio Edison Co., 77 Ohio St.3d 102, 105 (1996).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Pandey v. Piqua Bd. of Zoning Appeals

    2023 Ohio 1302 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 21, 2023

    CT. 2052 (1984) AND STATE V. … Brown v. Scioto Cty. Bd. of Commrs., 87 Ohio App.3d 704, 711, 622 N.E.2d 1153 (4th Dist.1993).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Winer v. Clay Twp.

    2017 Ohio 8765 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 1, 2017

    Code Ann. ch. 2506.’ ” The quotation comes from Mays v. Board of Trustees of Miami Township, 2d Dist. Montgomery No. 18997, 2002-Ohio-3303, and this is the only mention of R.C. Chapter 2506 in the opinion. … Brown’s affidavit is attached to the defendants’ summary-judgment motion.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Berkmyer v. Serra

    2011 Ohio 5901 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 14, 2011

    Hanson v. Guernsey County Board of Commissioners, 65 Ohio St.3d 545, 1992-Ohio-73. … We find Justice Brown's dissent in Simon v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown, Unpublished Decision (11-3-2006)

    2006 Ohio 5769 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 3, 2006

    State v. … State v.

    Cited 1 timesUnpublished
  • State v. Brown, Unpublished Decision (9-7-2006)

    2006 Ohio 4594 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 7, 2006

    See State v. … State v. Brown, Franklin App. No. 02AP-11, 2002-Ohio-5345 , at ¶ 10, quoting State v. Long (Feb. 6, 1997), Franklin App.

    Cited 1 timesUnpublished
  • State v. Brown, Unpublished Decision (6-10-2004)

    2004 Ohio 3094 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 10, 2004

    State v. Finfrock (Aug. 28, 1998), Miami App. No. 97CA64, unreported. Mr. … Brown does not set forth any justification for his long delay in filing his petition.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • State v. Putzke

    7 Ohio App. 2d 18 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 29, 1966

    Brown, J. … The defendant several times requested the officers, before they boarded the boat, to obtain a search warrant.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Scali v. CSA HS UHHS Canton, Inc.

    2012 Ohio 577 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 13, 2012

    An appellate court may reverse a board's decision only if the decision is unlawful, unreasonable, or against the manifest weight of the evidence. See, Tzangas, Plakas & Mannos v. … Shaffer–Goggin v. Unemployment Compensation Review Commission, Richland App. No. 03–CA–2, 2003–Ohio–6907, citing Hall v. American Brake Shoe Co., 13 Ohio St.2d 11, 233 N.E.2d 582 (1968); Brown–Brockmeyer Co. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Surber v. Greenville Twp. Bd. of Trustees

    2026 Ohio 1305 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 10, 2026

    [T]he zoning board of appeals is not and cannot be a party.” Spencer v. … Sun Refining & Marketing Co. v. Brennan (1987), 31 Ohio St.3d 306, 31 OBR 584, 511 N.E.2d 112; State ex rel. Chevalier v. Brown (1985), 17 Ohio St.3d 61, 17 OBR 64, 477 N.E.2d 623.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Asad v. Ohio State Med. Bd.

    79 Ohio App. 3d 143 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 12, 1992

    Preliminarily, we note that a court of common pleas must affirm the order of the board if the order is supported by reliable, probative and substantial evidence. R.C. 119.12; Univ. of Cincinnati v. … Ford v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Janovsky v. Ohio Bureau of Employment Services

    108 Ohio App. 3d 690 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 24, 1996

    See, also, Biles v. Ohio Bur. of Emp. … with the same standard as must be used by the trial court, that is, whether a decision of the board is unlawful, unreasonable, or against the manifest weight of the evidence”); Galluzzo v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown, Unpublished Decision (4-3-2006)

    2006 Ohio 1716 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 3, 2006

    DECISION AND JUDGMENT ENTRY {¶ 1} Defendant-Appellant, Timothy Brown, Jr., appeals the trial court's judgment sentencing him to ninety days in jail for violating previously imposed community control sanctions. … . {¶ 2} However, we have previously held otherwise in State v. McDonald, Ross App. No. 04CA2806, 2005-Ohio-3503 , State v. Smittle, Ross App. No., 05CA2827, 2005-Ohio-3577 , State v. Maxwell, Ross App.

    Cited 1 timesUnpublished
  • Novak v. Steele

    11 Ohio Law. Abs. 699 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 9, 1931

    the reason that the assessment was made according to the foot front method, and it is urged in argument that this was an equalization of the assessment and that therefore no complaint was necessary to be lodged with any board … Attention is called to the case of Bashore v Brown, Treasurer, 108 Oh St 18, and to City of Cuyahoga Falls v Beck; et al, 110 Oh St 82.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Reineck v. Randall

    20 Ohio App. 3d 97 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 8, 1984

    In State v. … As this court noted in [State v.]

    Cited 4 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.