Case law

Christian Care Home of Cincinnati, Inc. v. State Certificate of Need Review Board

48 Ohio App. 3d 158 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 26, 1988

The basis for appellee’s motion was that the order of the State Certificate of Need Review Board (“board”) from which the appeal was taken was not a final, appealable order pursuant to former R.C. 3702.58. … Appellant requested an adjudication hearing before the board on January 13, 1986.

Blackmore v. Nasal

74 Ohio App. 3d 382 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 31, 1991

Gyurcik, v. Brown (1964), 176 Ohio St. 288 , 27 O.O.2d 200 , 199 N.E.2d 596 . … The purpose of R.C. 3501.38(C) is to enable the board of elections to determine whether the signer of the petition timely signed the petition and is a *384 registered voter. State, ex rel. Donofrio, v.

State v. Brown, Unpublished Decision (1-31-2006)

2006 Ohio 385 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 31, 2006

Brown, appeals from a judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas sentencing him to 20 years in prison following his guilty pleas to one count of involuntary manslaughter and one count of aggravated robbery. … State v. Brown, Franklin App.

State, Ex Rel. Moss v. Bd, Elections

69 Ohio App. 2d 115 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 16, 1980

Co., v. … Likewise, it is true that, in Foster v.

State, Ex Rel. Kauffman v. Campbell

59 Ohio App. 461 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 14, 1938

The case so instituted is admitted to be the case reported under the style of State, ex rel. v Guckenberger, 131 Oh St 466. … But it is said that State, ex rel, v Witter, 114 Oh St 357, decides to the contrary under similar circumstances. We do not so read that case.

Sutton v. State Pharmacy Board of Ohio, 2008-T-0053 (12-26-2008)

2008 Ohio 6887 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 26, 2008

While the board may not like this determination by the psychiatrist, the feelings of the board are not relevant. {¶ 44} If we accept the position of the board, appellant has received a lifetime suspension because he missed … a board-imposed deadline.

Picciuto v. Lucas County Commissioners

69 Ohio App. 3d 789 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 12, 1990

The board of county commissioners as a quasi-corporate body, represents the county in legal actions against the county. Hunter, supra; State ex. rel. Hartshorn, v. Walker (1848), 17 Ohio 135 , 141. … The board's representative capacity, however, is essentially limited to the county's financial matters. Jones v. Commrs. of Lucas County (1897), 57 Ohio St. 189 .

Miami University v. State Employment Relations Bd.

70 Ohio App. 3d 514 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 6, 1990

Miami University v. State Employment Relations Board (Mar. 1, 1990), Franklin App. No. 89AP-1471, unreported (1990 Opinions 673). … See Genoa Banking Co. v. Mills (1981), 67 Ohio St. 2d 106, 112 ; accord Clermont Natl. Bank v. Edwards (1970), 27 Ohio App. 2d 91 .

State Ex Rel. Brown v. State Teachers Ret., Unpublished Decision (8-16-2005)

2005 Ohio 4246 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 16, 2005

Id., quoting Taber v. Ohio Dept. of Human Services (1998), 125 Ohio App.3d 742 , 750 , quoting P.H. English v. Koster (1980), 61 Ohio St.2d 17 . {¶ 10} Here, the board's interpretation of Ohio Adm. … James Brown, : Relator, : v. : No. 04AP-753 State Teachers Retirement System : (REGULAR CALENDAR) Board of Ohio, : Respondent. : MAGISTRATE'S DECISION Rendered on March 17, 2005 Green Haines Sgambati Co., L.P.A., Stanley

Weigel v. Ohio Bd. of Nursing

2014 Ohio 4069 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 18, 2014

V. … LUPER SCHUSTER, TYACK, and BROWN, JJ., concur

State Ex Rel. C.S. Burge, Inc. v. Fulton County Board of Commissioners

87 Ohio App. 3d 610 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 26, 1993

Westchester Estates, Inc. v. Bacon (1980), 61 Ohio St.2d 42 , 15 O.O.3d 53 , 399 N.E.2d 81 . … Executone of Northwest Ohio, Inc. v. Commrs. of Lucas Cty. (1984), 12 Ohio St.3d 60, 61 , 12 OBR 51, 52, 465 N.E.2d 416, 417 , relying upon R.C. 307.90.

Rdsor v. Knox Cty. Bd. of Revision, 2006-Ca-38 (12-19-2007)

2007 Ohio 6823 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 19, 2007

Tax Appeals cited Cleveland Board of Education v. … Cuyahoga County Board of Revision (1994), 68 Ohio St. 3d 336 ; Crow v. Cuyahoga Board of Revision (1990), 50 Ohio St. 3d 55 ; and Mentor Exempted Village Board of Education v.

State ex rel. Village of Kettering v. Montgomery County Board of Elections

71 Ohio Law. Abs. 550 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 23, 1955

Family Med. of Stark Cty., Inc. v. Smart

2017 Ohio 5866 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 17, 2017

Brown v. Williamson, 2nd Dist. Montgomery No. 22769, 2009-Ohio-4579; Union Hospital v. Beach, 5th Dist. Tuscarawas No. 2016 AP 05 0027, 2016-Ohio-7058; Home Helpers/Direct Link v. St. Pierre, 12th Dist. Warren No. … Brown v. Williamson, 2nd Dist. Montgomery No. 22769, 2009-Ohio-4579. Thus, R.C. 3103.03(A) requires the married person be unable to support herself before the spouse of the married person must assist.

Nalluri v. State Med. Bd.

2014 Ohio 5530 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 16, 2014

BROWN, J. {¶ 1} Anil Choudary Nalluri, M.D., appellant, appeals from the judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas, in which the court affirmed the order by the State Medical Board of Ohio ("board"), appellee … Hanni v.

In Re Protest of Evans

167 Ohio App. 3d 674 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 30, 2006

Canales-Flores v. Lucas Cty. … Bryant, Brown and French, JJ., concur.

Applegate v. Harshman

89 Ohio Law. Abs. 567 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 1, 1962

v. … We have carefully considered all of the claimed errors as *570 signed, and find none prejudicial to the substantial rights of the appellants, the Board of Trustees of Southington Township. Judgment affirmed. Brown, P.

In Re Application for Vacation of Alley

107 Ohio App. 47 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 14, 1958

In Railroad Co. v. … Horton, 1 Dis., 401, 404; Brown v. Manning, et al., 6 Ohio, 298, 303; Huber, et al. v. Gazley, et al., 18 Ohio 18 .” See also, Thompson v. City of Columbus, 22 O. N. P. (N. S.) 33.

State v. Brumback

109 Ohio App. 3d 65 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 31, 1996

State v. Brown (1953), 110 Ohio App. 57, 61 , 12 O.O.2d 227, 229 , 168 N.E.2d 419, 422 . … See, also, State v. Brown (1994), 99 Ohio App.3d 604, 610 , 651 N.E.2d 470, 474 . Thus, the rule authorizes amendment in the court’s limited discretion. Again, abuse of discretion is the foundation for error.

Ralph Myers Contracting Corp. v. Bowers

110 Ohio App. 17 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 13, 1958

In the case of Tri-State Asphalt Corp. v. … In the case of The Powhatan Mining Co. v.