Case law

Tablack v. Board of Mahoning County Commissioners, 07 Ma 197 (9-17-2008)

2008 Ohio 4804 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 17, 2008

Burgos v. … Youngbird v.

Rohrbaugh v. Elida Local Bd. of Edn.

63 Ohio App. 3d 685 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 28, 1990

Accordingly, a court has no authority to replace the board's construction of its rules with its own and thereby, determine that the board unreasonably interpreted its own rules. Brannon v. … See Wood v. Strickland (1975), 420 U.S. 308 and Board of Educ. of Rogers, Ark. v. McCluskey (1982), 458 U.S. 966 .

Rose Hill Chapel-Ciriello Funeral Home v. Ohio Board of Embalmers & Funeral Directors

105 Ohio App. 3d 213 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 12, 1995

See, e.g., Leon v. Ohio Bd. of Psychology (1992), 63 Ohio St.3d 683, 687 , 590 N.E.2d 1223, 1226 ; Chaney v. Clark Cty. Agricultural Soc., Inc. (1993), 90 Ohio App.3d 421, 426 , 629 N.E.2d 513, 516-517 . … See Van Camp v. Riley (1984), 16 Ohio App.3d 457, 463 , 16 OBR 539, 544-545, 476 N.E.2d 1078, 1083-1084 ; Little Forest Med. Ctr. of Akron v. Ohio Civ.

Brown v. State, Unpublished Decision (3-24-2006)

2006 Ohio 1393 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 24, 2006

Grafton v. Ohio Edison Co. (1996), 77 Ohio St.3d 102 , 105 . Accordingly, we review the trial court's grant of summary judgment independently and without deference to the trial court's determination. Brown v. … Tubbs Jones v.

Gibby's Auto Exchange v. Ohio Motor Vehicle Dealer Bd.

2024 Ohio 5618 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 26, 2024

(“Board”), which revoked its used motor vehicle dealer’s license. … Bank v. Burda, 10th Dist. No. 08AP-658, 2009-Ohio-1752, ¶ 21, citing App.R. 12(A)(1)(b). Without assignments of error to consider, an appellate court has nothing to review. Habtemariam-Brown v. Christensen, 10th Dist.

Boone v. Brown, Unpublished Decision (11-13-2006)

2006 Ohio 5967 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 13, 2006

Brown Jr. … Thomas v. Barnhouse, 2nd Dist. No. 2003-CA-22, 2004-Ohio-77 . Without some allegation that notice was not given, the trial court did not err in denying the motion for contempt.

Kelly v. Accountancy Bd. of Ohio

88 Ohio App. 3d 453 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 30, 1993

Athens Home Telephone Co. v. Peck (1953), 158 Ohio St. 557 , 49 O.O. 474 , 110 N.E.2d 571 ; Hoover Universal, Inc. v. Limbach (1991), 61 Ohio St.3d 563 , 575 N.E.2d 811 . … Scheu v. State (1910), 83 Ohio St. 146 , 157-158, 93 N.E. 969 , 972.

Lancaster City School Bd. of Edn. v. Fairfield Cty. Bd. of Revision

2024 Ohio 1561 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 23, 2024

BROWN-THOMPSON Civil Division Chief ROBERT D. BALLINGER Fairfield County Prosecutor’s Office SARAH J. SPARKS 239 W. … Dunbar v.

Chapman v. Manix

17 Ohio Law. Abs. 16 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 6, 1934

Kepner v Snively, 19 Ohio, 296; Merchants & Mfrs. Ins. Co. v Shillito, 15 Oh St, 559; Spangler v Brown, 26 Oh St, 389; C. H. & D. R. Co. v Kassen, 49 Oh St, 240; Minnear v Holloway, 56 Oh St, 148. … State ex Porter, a taxpayer v Clark et, Board of Commissioners of Sandusky County, 112 Oh St, 133, was a case originally tried in the Common Pleas Court; and after judgment there was appealed to the Court of Appeals, where

State v. Brown, Unpublished Decision (7-25-2005)

2005 Ohio 3824 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 25, 2005

Brown, and/or an accomplice, had a firearm on or about their person, or under their control while committing the offense, and the said, Joshua S. … . {¶ 26} Addressing State v.

Helmers v. McCarthy

6 Ohio App. 423 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 29, 1917

After a careful consideration we have reached the conclusion that the principles of law announced in the case of Mills, Trustee, v. Bd. of Equalization of Cincinnati, 1 C. S. C. … Frazer et al. v. Sieborn, Auditor, et al., 16 Ohio St., 614 , at page 624. Courts of equity look through the form into the substance of things.

Olberding v. Smith

34 Ohio Law. Abs. 84 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 15, 1934

Vorenberg v Bunnell, et, 153 N. E. 884 . Crawford, et v Senosky et, 128 Oregon 229. Dolan et v Brown, 338 Ill 412 ( 170 N. E. 425 ). Ludgate v Somerville, 121 Oregon 643 (54 A. L. R. 837). See also Note in 54 A. L. … In Brown v Huber et, 80 Oh St 183, it is stated in the syllabus: “1.

R. A. Miller Produce, Inc. v. Bowers

119 Ohio App. 283 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 14, 1963

The American Restaurant and Lunch Co. v. Glander, 147 Ohio St., 147 , 70 N. … Brown and Carlisle, JJ., concur.

Ohio Civil Service Employees Ass'n v. State Employment Relations Board

144 Ohio App. 3d 96 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 16, 2001

Charlton v. … See Rarick v. Geauga Cty. Commrs. (1980), 63 Ohio St.2d 34 , 17 O.O.3d 21 , 406 N.E.2d 1101 .

Blackmore v. Nasal

74 Ohio App. 3d 382 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 31, 1991

Gyurcik, v. Brown (1964), 176 Ohio St. 288 , 27 O.O.2d 200 , 199 N.E.2d 596 . … The purpose of R.C. 3501.38(C) is to enable the board of elections to determine whether the signer of the petition timely signed the petition and is a *384 registered voter. State, ex rel. Donofrio, v.

Board of Trustees Chester Twp. v. Baumgardner, 2006-G-2721 (4-16-2007)

2007 Ohio 1783 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 16, 2007

In December of 2000, the Board of Trustees filed another show cause motion against him, based on the 1982 injunction. Bd. of Trustees of Chester Twp. v. Baumgardner , 11th Dist. … Id. at ¶ 16. {¶ 12} April 4, 2006, the Board filed a second motion to impose sanctions relative to the trial court's March 21, 2002 finding of contempt against Mr. Godale. Godale V at ¶ 8.

State v. Brown, Unpublished Decision (1-31-2006)

2006 Ohio 385 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 31, 2006

Brown, appeals from a judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas sentencing him to 20 years in prison following his guilty pleas to one count of involuntary manslaughter and one count of aggravated robbery. … State v. Brown, Franklin App.

State, Ex Rel. Moss v. Bd, Elections

69 Ohio App. 2d 115 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 16, 1980

Co., v. … Likewise, it is true that, in Foster v.

In re Appeal in the Cty. Ditch known as Spallinger Ditch

154 N.E.3d 321 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 27, 2020

Matrix Technologies, Inc. v. Kuss Corp., 6th Dist. Lucas No. L-07-1301, 2008-Ohio-1301, ¶ 11, citing Brown v. Cty. … Chapter 6131 governs a common pleas court’s jurisdiction to review an administrative appeal of a decision by a board of county commissioners authorizing ditch improvements. See Clevenger v. Bd. of Cty.

Picciuto v. Lucas County Commissioners

69 Ohio App. 3d 789 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 12, 1990

The board of county commissioners as a quasi-corporate body, represents the county in legal actions against the county. Hunter, supra; State ex. rel. Hartshorn, v. Walker (1848), 17 Ohio 135 , 141. … The board's representative capacity, however, is essentially limited to the county's financial matters. Jones v. Commrs. of Lucas County (1897), 57 Ohio St. 189 .