Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersohioctapp

10,000+ results

2.50s

  • State v. Wright

    2025 Ohio 1690 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 12, 2025

    State v. … -8- Brown CA2024-10-011 community.'" State v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Ohio Ass'n of Public School Employees v. Cincinnati Board of Education

    1 Ohio App. 3d 20 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 31, 1980

    Dayton Teachers Assn. v. Dayton Bd. of Edn. (1975), 41 Ohio St. 2d 127 [70 O.O. 2d 223]. … Civil Service Personnel Assn. v. Akron (Summit Cty. Ct. of Appeals No. 7774, October 15, 1975), unreported, affirmed (1976), 48 Ohio St. 2d 25 [2 O.O. 3d 98].

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Filipiak v. Midview Local School District Board of Education

    95 Ohio App. 3d 139 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 14, 1993

    Kneisley v. Lattimer-Stevens Co. (1988), 40 Ohio St.3d 354, 357 , 533 N.E.2d 743, 746 , citing Hough v. Dayton Mfg. Co. (1902), 66 Ohio St. 427 , 64 N.E. 521 . … Appellants also rely on two Ohio Supreme Court cases to support their claim, Crawford v. Barberton City Schools Bd. of Edn. (1983), 6 Ohio St.3d 324 , 6 OBR 382, 453 N.E.2d 627 , and State ex rel. Madden v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • State v. Cameron

    2011 Ohio 4484 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 7, 2011

    [Cite as State v. Cameron, 2011-Ohio-4484.] … C-081148, 2010-Ohio-1879,¶20. 5 See State v. Brown, 1st Dist. Nos. C-100390 and C-100310, 2011-Ohio-1029, ¶8 and ¶9, quoting State v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • May Department Stores Co. v. Board of Review-Ohio Bureau of Employment Services

    49 Ohio App. 2d 21 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 13, 1975

    Ivy v. Dudley (1966), 6 Ohio St. 2d 261 ; Dowler v. Bd. of Review (1967), 9 Ohio St. 2d 42 . These decisions adopt the judgment and reasoning of this court in Marcum v. … George cites the case of Mathieu v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Carrousel North, Inc. v. Chelsea Moore Co.

    9 Ohio App. 3d 344 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 25, 1983

    French v. Toledo (1909), 81 Ohio St. 160 . … rights and positions on the Board of Directors. <(* * * “8.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Schlagheck v. Winterfeld

    108 Ohio App. 299 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 29, 1958

    Village of Oak Hill, v. Brown, Clerk, 125 Ohio St., 171 , at page 177, 180 N. E., 707 , the court pointed out that in State, ex rel. City of Toledo, v. Weiler, 113 Ohio St., 443 , 149 N. … Co. v. Toledo Ry. & Terminal Co., supra ( 72 Ohio St., 368 ), and distinguishes State, ex rel. Board of Edn. of City School Dist. of Cincinnati, v. Ach, 113 Ohio St., 482 , 149 N.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown, 24119 (11-12-2008)

    2008 Ohio 5846 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 12, 2008

    State v. Brown , 9th Dist. No. 23637, 2008-Ohio-2670 , at ¶ 35 . {¶ 4} On January 14, 2008, Brown filed a petition to vacate or set aside judgment and sentence pursuant to R.C. 2953.21 et seq. … State v. Hoehn , 9th Dist. No. 03CA0076-M, 2004-Ohio-1419 , at ¶ 43 , quoting Strickland v.

    Cited 6 timesUnpublished
  • State v. Landgraf

    2014 Ohio 5448 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 12, 2014

    State v. Russell, 2d Dist. Montgomery No. 25132, 2012-Ohio-6051, ¶ 7. “If a defendant’s guilty plea is not knowing and voluntary, it has been obtained in violation of due process and is void.” State v. Brown, 2d Dist. … State v. Brown, 2d Dist. Montgomery No. 21896, 2007-Ohio-6675, ¶ 3. {¶ 13} The Supreme Court of Ohio has urged trial courts to literally comply with Crim.R. 11. State v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Miller v. Wayne County Joint Vocational School District Board of Education

    69 Ohio App. 2d 66 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 16, 1980

    Brown (1975), 42 Ohio St. 2d 53 , the court analyzed the interplay of R. C. 3319.07 and 3319.11. R. … Hura, v. Bd. of Edn. (1977), 51 Ohio St. 2d 19, 21-22 ; State, ex rel. Farley, v. Bd. of Edn. (1959), 169 Ohio St. 388 , 391-92. Here, the board did not comply with the letter of R.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Lu v. Akron Dept. of Neighborhood Assistance

    2023 Ohio 1351 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 26, 2023

    The order released the surety bond to the Board and ordered the Board’s demolition order executed. {¶6} Mr. … EVE V. BELFANCE, Director of Law, and JOHN YORK and VONSHEAY V. BROWN, Assistant Directors of Law, for Appellee.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Manos v. Harter

    104 Ohio App. 3d 430 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 5, 1995

    Morrissey v. Brewer (1972), 408 U.S. 471, 486 , 92 S.Ct. 2593, 2602-2603 , 33 L.Ed.2d 484, 497 ; United States ex rel. Miller v. Twomey *433 (C.A.7, 1973), 479 F.2d 701, 716 ; and Ruiz v. … Brown v. Frey (C.A.8, 1989), 889 F.2d 159 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown, Unpublished Decision (6-7-2005)

    2005 Ohio 2939 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 7, 2005

    State v. Brown (1992), 64 Ohio St.3d 476 , at the syllabus, 597 N.E.2d 97 . {¶ 27} In Brown , the court of appeals reversed Brown's conviction after finding that he had been denied his right to a speedy trial. … State v. Brown, 98 Ohio St.3d 121 , 2002-Ohio-7040 , at ¶ 26 . Appellant argues that since Brown, was decided after his motion for discovery was filed, its holding does not apply to him.

    Abrogated on other grounds by State v. Haynes, 171 Ohio St. 3d 508 (2022)Cited 49 timesUnpublished
  • State v. Airway Distributors

    34 Ohio App. 3d 176 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 30, 1986

    the following circumstances: "* * * “(4) If, acting with the kind of culpability otherwise required for the commission of the offense, its commission was authorized, requested, commanded, tolerated, or performed by the board … The flyer advertised “brown and clears,” as well as other descriptive color pills for sale in quantity.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Wortham v. Dayton

    215 N.E.3d 685 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 26, 2023

    Burgess denied that either she or her friend Timothy Brown had yelled at the dog on the date in question. … We cannot say that the trial court erred in upholding the Board's determination that Wortham should be discharged for his actions. Wortham’s third assignment of error is overruled. V.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Bryant v. Kent City School District Board of Education

    71 Ohio App. 3d 748 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 2, 1991

    Democratic Executive Committee v. Brown (1974), 39 Ohio St.2d 157, 161 , 68 O.O.2d 100, 103 , 314 N.E.2d 376, 379 . … Dennis v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Marlow v. Bureau of Unemployment Comp.

    4 Ohio App. 2d 299 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 11, 1965

    Brown-Brockmeyer Co. v. Roach (1947), 148 Ohio St. 511, at 518 . See, also, Craig v. Bureau of Unemployment Compensation (1948), 51 Ohio Law Abs. 449 . … We cannot say that the similar interpretation placed upon the statutes by the Board of Review is contrary to law.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown, Unpublished Decision (12-31-2003)

    2003 Ohio 7183 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 31, 2003

    State v. Brown (1988), 38 Ohio St.3d 305 , 310 . However, "[a]bsent state involvement contributing to the witness's pretrial exposure to the defendant, due process guarantees are not implicated." State v. … See, also, Brown at 481; State v. Patterson (Mar. 29, 1996), 11th Dist.

    Cited 50 timesUnpublished
  • Sachs Corp. of U.S.A. v. Rossmann

    9 Ohio App. 3d 188 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 10, 1983

    This is the standard to which the board of review must adhere when deter *191 mining whether an employee should be denied unemployment compensation benefits. See Taylor v. Bd. of Review (April 17, 1980), Cuyahoga App. … Under these circumstances, we cannot say that the determination of the board that appellee had just cause for quitting was against the manifest weight of the evidence. See R.C. 4141.28(O); Brown-Brockmeyer Co. v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • State v. Madaris

    156 Ohio App. 3d 211 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 13, 2004

    . {¶ 10} In State v. Brown, 1st Dist. Nos. … See State v. Brown, at ¶ 29.

    Cited 17 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.