Case law

Tucker v. Leadership Academy for Math & Science of Columbus

2014 Ohio 3307 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 29, 2014

BROWN, J. {¶ 1} This is an appeal by plaintiff-appellant, André R. … Aurora Loan Servs. v. Kahook, 9th Dist. No. 24415, 2009-Ohio-2997, ¶ 6, citing Tschantz v.

Ohio Academy of Chiropractic Physicians v. State Board of Chiropractic Examiners

31 Ohio App. 3d 75 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 3, 1986

The case of Fowler v. Board of Registration in Chiropody (1965), 374 Mich. 254 , 132 N.W. 2d 82 , is distinguishable. … See American Cancer Society, Inc. v. Dayton (1953), 160 Ohio St. 114 , at 122-123, 51 O.O. 32 , at 36, 114 N.E. 2d 219 , at 224.

State v. Brown, Unpublished Decision (11-30-2006)

2006 Ohio 6267 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 30, 2006

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Jakeena Brown, appeals her conviction on two counts of aggravated assault and one count of domestic violence. … Appellant presented evidence on her behalf; she testified, and called her son and the investigating detective, Earl Brown.

Fayetteville-Perry Education Ass'n v. Fayetteville Perry Local School

3 Ohio App. Unrep. 327 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 21, 1990

In its complaint, the association, which is the representative of the board's professional employees, asked the Brown County Court of Common Pleas to order the board to refrain from unilaterally implementing changes in the … Gunn v. Bd. of Edn. (June 23, 1988), Cuyahoga App. No. 45038, unreported. In Lorain City Bd. of Edn. v. State Emp.

Doe v. State Med. Bd. of Ohio

2024 Ohio 5615 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 26, 2024

Brown, for appellee Jan Kriwinsky, M.D. Argued: S. Michael Lear. … Moore v. Middletown, 133 Ohio St.3d 55, 2012-Ohio-3897, ¶ 20, citing Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Commrs. v. State, 112 Ohio St.3d 59, 2006-Ohio-6499, ¶ 23. Standing may be conferred by statute. Middletown v.

Van-Huffel Tube Corp. v. Bowers

117 Ohio App. 488 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 13, 1963

Brown, P. J. This case is before the court upon appeal from a decision of the Board of Tax Appeals affirming a modified sales and use tax assessment in amount of $4,027.06. … The board commented on language used in unreported Board of Tax Appeals case No, 40104, Bruns v.

Weil v. Ohio Med. Marijuana Control Comm.

2023 Ohio 944 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 23, 2023

Brown, and Shaun P. Omen, for appellee. … See Pankey v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr., 10th Dist. No. 13AP-701, 2014-Ohio-2907, ¶ 7; Wiltz v. Accountancy Bd. Of Ohio, 10th Dist.

International Ass'n of Firefighters v. City of Dayton Civil Service Board

157 Ohio App. 3d 236 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 28, 2004

King v. … In Hile v.

Winbush v. Cincinnati Music Festival

2022 Ohio 2799 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 12, 2022

Brown v. Cincinnati, 2020-Ohio-5418, 162 N.E.3d 1274, ¶ 10 (1st Dist.). … See Sudnik v.

State ex rel. Doran v. Preble Cty. Bd. of Commrs.

2013 Ohio 3579 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 19, 2013

Driscoll, 3300 Great American Tower, 301 East 4th Street, Cincinnati, Ohio 45202 and Frost Brown Todd LLC, Benjamin J. … Wilson v.

Cincinnati Ambulatory Surgery Center v. Ohio Certificate of Need Review Board

62 Ohio App. 3d 1 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 13, 1988

On May 8, 1986, OLMH appealed SHPDA’s dismissal to the Certificate of Need Review Board (“CONRB”) and requested an adjudication hearing. … Bell v. Bd. of Trustees of Lawrence Cty. Gen. Hosp. (1973), 34 Ohio St.2d 70, 74 , 63 O.O.2d 115, 117 , 296 N.E.2d 276, 278 .

Name Brand Furniture Warehouse, Inc. v. Cuyahoga County Board of Revision

41 Ohio App. 3d 47 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 15, 1987

However, neither the board of revision nor any adverse party challenged the subtenant’s standing before the board of revision. Thus, that procedural defect was waived. Cf. Claxton v. … II The auditor and the school board rely on early cases that preclude an amendment to cure a defective appeal. American Restaurant & Lunch Co. v.

Gdovichin v. Geauga County Highway Department

90 Ohio App. 3d 805 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 4, 1993

In Hartsock v. … Brown, J., concurring).

Dublin City Schools Bd. of Edn. v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Revision

111 N.E.3d 1224 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 22, 2018

Witt Co. v. Hamilton Cty. Bd. of Revision, 61 Ohio St.3d 155, 157 (1991). Thus, legal conclusions are reviewed de novo. Terraza 8, L.L.C. v. Franklin Cty. … In support of this assertion, Lowe's cites Shinkle v. Ashtabula Cty. Bd. of Revision, 135 Ohio St.3d 227, 2013-Ohio-397, Hilltop Commons, LLC v. Mingo, 10th Dist.

State v. Elmore

2017 Ohio 1472 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 19, 2017

On the way to the day room, they passed an ironing board. … Id., citing State v.

Murray v. Columbus

2014 Ohio 2790 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 26, 2014

Law Enforcement Assn. v. … V.

Simington v. Shimp

60 Ohio App. 2d 402 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 15, 1978

It has no right or authority as an advisory board or reviewing body as to other public officers, board, commissioners and authorities.” … This language was cited by the Federal District Court for the Northern District of Ohio in the above-noted decision of Hammond v. Brown .

State, Ex Rel., Keener v. Serr

53 Ohio App. 2d 143 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 27, 1976

Flemming v. Nestor (1960), 363 U. S. 603 ; Samuels v. McCurdy (1925), 267 U. S. 188 ; Barbour v. Georgia (1919), 249 U. S. 454 . … Brown, P. J., and Potter, J., concur. 1 Paragraph four of the syllabus of Euclid v.

St. Albans Township Board of Trustees v. Columbia Gas Transmission Corp.

116 Ohio App. 3d 349 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 22, 1997

Appellants Licking County Board of Commissioners and St. … Co. v. Watson (1925), 112 Ohio St. 385 , 147 N.E. 907 ; Callen v. Columbus Edison Elec. Light Co. (1902), 66 Ohio St. 166 , 64 N.E. 141 .

State v. Henry, 2006-Ca-00245 (10-24-2007)

2007 Ohio 5702 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 24, 2007

you're under their control, or they can impose one half of your stated prison term minus three years, but Judge *Page 5 Brown also has a term on you. … See, also, State v. Balderson , Stark App. No. 2006CA00226, 2007-Ohio-2463 , and State v. Roberson , Stark App.