Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersohioctapp

10,000+ results

4.62s

  • Maas v. Maas

    161 N.E.3d 863 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 4, 2020

    Brosz at 788, quoting Brown v. … Sayyah v. O’Farrell, 12th Dist. Brown No.

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • Raceway Video & Bookshop, Inc. v. Cleveland Board of Zoning Appeals

    118 Ohio App. 3d 264 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 18, 1997

    See Red Garter, Inc. v. Cleveland Bd. of Zoning Appeals (1995), 100 Ohio App.3d 177, 181 , 652 N.E.2d 260, 262-263 ; Northeast Ohio Emergency Affiliates v. Ohio State Med. … Robert Brown, Assistant Director of the City Planning Commission, testified there was no way to make a determination that Parcel 1 was a useless and nonconforming lot.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Piekutowski v. South Central Ohio Educational Service Center Governing Board

    161 Ohio App. 3d 372 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 3, 2005

    Seasons Coal Co. v. … To support its argument, the board relies on Greene Cty. Guidance Ctr., Inc. v. Greene-Clinton Community Mental Health Bd. (1984), 19 Ohio App.3d 1 , 19 OBR 46, 482 N.E.2d 982 , and Theile v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Workman v. Ohio Dept. of Ins.

    2012 Ohio 4809 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 17, 2012

    University of Cincinnati v. Conrad, 63 Ohio St. 2d 108, 407 N.E. 2d 1265, citing Rossford Exempted Village School District Board of Education v. … The trial court found it had no authority to review the sanction ODI had imposed. {¶25} In State Medical Board of Ohio v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Highland Crest Associates, L.L.C. v. Lucas County Board of Revision

    194 Ohio App. 3d 127 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 29, 2011

    Blakemore v. … If the trial court finds that the evidence before the board of revision was neither reliable nor probative, it may-reject the decision of the board. Berner v. Sodders, 2d Dist.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Buckeye Boxes, Inc. v. Franklin County Board of Revision

    78 Ohio App. 3d 634 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 12, 1992

    Relying on N Olmsted v. Cuyahoga Cty. … It is well established that only complainants before the board of revision have standing to take an appeal to the Board of Tax Appeals. N. Olmsted, supra; Cleveland Bd. of Edn. v. Cuyahoga Cty.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Groff v. Harris

    18 Ohio Law. Abs. 101 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 3, 1934

    Coast Steel Co. v U. & L. Const. Co. 1 Pac. (2d) 588 (Oregon, 1931), Block v Love. 27 Pac. (2d) 984 (New Mexico, 1933), Hot Springs Plumbing & Heating Co. v Wallace. 128 Minn. 261 (1915), Lamoreaux v Andersch. 40 C. … of lack of funds and the house had been boarded up, to find out the situation and ascertain whether or not Mrs.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • City of Dayton v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

    40 Ohio App. 3d 114 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 28, 1987

    See Columbus v. Bd. of Review (Mar. 15, 1977), Franklin App. No. 76AP-776, unreported. It is the board’s position that the park, golf course and expressway moving programs do not constitute separate seasonal industries. … This court analyzed and rejected many of the same arguments in the case of Columbus v. Bd. of Review, supra, which analyses are controlling in this case.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Foreign Missions of the Presbyterian Church v. Bevan

    2 Ohio App. 182 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 27, 1913

    Co. v. Wood, 113 Ind., 544 . … Turnbull et al. v. Richardson, 69 Mich., 400 ; People v. Foley, 64 Mich., 148 ; West Exrx., v. Knoppenberger, 4 C. C., N. S., 305.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • State v. Johnson

    2016 Ohio 7931 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 28, 2016

    No. 26697, 2014-Ohio- 3900. {¶21} However, most recently in State v. Brown, Fifth Dist. Richland Co. … Brown then finds Adkins “persuasive”.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Taylor v. Board of County Commrs.

    24 Ohio App. 288 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 7, 1927

    We cite the following authorities: Lewis v. State, 4 Ohio, 389; Tracy v. Card, 2 Ohio St., 431 ; Pfeifer v. Graves, 88 Ohio St., 473 , 104 N. E., 529 ; Pollitz v. Pub. Utilities Com., 93 Ohio St., 483 , 113 N. … Referring to the nullity of the journal entry in question, we cite the following: Southward v. Jamison, 66 Ohio St., 290, 64 N. E., 135 ; Russell, Adm’r., v. Fourth National Bank, 102 Ohio St., 248 , 131 N. E., 726 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Griffith v. Department of Youth Services

    28 Ohio App. 3d 76 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 5, 1985

    In Esselburne v. Ohio Dept. of Agriculture (1985), 29 Ohio App. 3d 152, at 159 , this court held that Ohio Adm. Code 123:1-5-08 could not be used to accomplish something which the statutory scheme does not allow. … Brown, J., retired, of the Supreme Court of Ohio, was assigned to active duty pursuant to Section 6(C), Article IV, Ohio Constitution.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • White v. King

    2014 Ohio 3896 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 5, 2014

    BROWN 17 South High Street, Suite 650 Columbus, Ohio 432315 [Cite as White v. King, 2014-Ohio-3896.] Wise, J. {¶1}. Plaintiff-Appellant Adam J. … See Moraine v. Montgomery County Board of Commissioners (1981), 67 Ohio St.2d 139, 423 N.E.2d 184.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Springfield City School Support Personnel v. State Employment Relations Board

    84 Ohio App. 3d 294 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 29, 1992

    Ohio Historical Soc. v. State Emp. Relations Bd. (1990), 48 Ohio St.3d 45 , 549 N.E.2d 157 ; M.J. Kelley Co. v. Cleveland (1972), 32 Ohio St.2d 150 , 61 O.O.2d 394 , 290 N.E.2d 562 ; Fortner v. … Bd. of Edn. v. State Bd. of Edn. (1978), 53 Ohio St.2d 173 , 7 O.O.3d 357 , 373 N.E.2d 1238 ; Brown v. Ohio Dept. of Transp. (1992), 83 Ohio App.3d 879 , 615 N.E.2d 1126 ; In re Seltzer (May 19, 1992), Franklin App.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • R.E. Holland Excavating Co. v. Montgomery County Board of Commissioners

    133 Ohio App. 3d 837 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 25, 1999

    The Board of County Commissioners of Montgomery County (“board”) awarded Holland the contract. … Koos v. Cent. Ohio Cellular, Inc. (1994), 94 Ohio App.3d 579, 588 , 641 N.E.2d 265, 271-272 . “Pursuant to Civ.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Dublin Woods, Ltd. v. Union County Board of Revision

    63 Ohio App. 3d 620 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 4, 1989

    Ridgeview Center, Inc. v. Lorain Cty. Bd. of Revision (1989), 42 Ohio St.3d 30, 31 , 536 N.E.2d 1157, 1158 . … In Chapman v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Katterhenrich v. Federal Hocking Local School District Board of Education

    121 Ohio App. 3d 579 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 11, 1997

    V. … Sullivan v. Brown (C.A.6, 1976), 544 F.2d 279, 283 , citing Bd. of Regents of State Colleges v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Ford Motor Co. v. Ohio Motor Vehicle Dealers Board

    117 Ohio App. 3d 25 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 24, 1996

    Albright v. Delaware Cty. … For reasons stated below, we find that the board patently and unambiguously lacks jurisdiction and may be prohibited from hearing the merits of Lloyd’s termination protest. State ex rel. Smith v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Taylor v. Lucas County Board of Elections

    43 Ohio App. 3d 176 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 22, 1988

    Kay, v. Brown (1970), 24 Ohio St. 2d 105 , 53 O.O. 2d 284, 264 N.E. 2d 908 . … Easton, v. Brown (1953), 160 Ohio St. 184 , 51 O.O. 446 , 115 N.E. 2d 1 ; State, ex rel. Wolfe, v. Lorain Cty. Bd. of Elections (1978), 59 Ohio App. 2d 257 , 13 O.O. 3d 258, 394 N.E. 2d 321 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Basler v. Princeton City School District Board of Education

    64 Ohio App. 3d 71 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 6, 1989

    Upon consideration of the circumstances, as well as the Supreme Court’s holding in Moldovan v. Cuyahoga Cty. … Wheeler v. Bd. of Edn. (1972), 30 Ohio App.2d 136 , 59 O.O.2d 242 , 283 N.E.2d 652 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.