Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersohioctapp

10,000+ results

2.14s

  • Cleveland Trinidad Paving Co. v. Board of County Commissioners

    15 Ohio App. 3d 66 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 16, 1984

    Furthermore, R.C. 305.25 provides the following: “No contract entered into by the board of county commissioners, or order made by it, shall be valid unless it has been assented to at a regular or special session of the board … CADO Business Systems of Ohio, Inc. v. Bd. of Edn. (1983), 8 Ohio App. 3d 385 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Waldron v. Board of County Commissioners

    83 Ohio Law. Abs. 97 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 27, 1959

    In the case of Myron Berlin et al, as Trustees of Liberty Township v. … The refusal of the Board of County Commissioners to act as petitioned by plaintiffs is based on its contention that the language of §503.09 R.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Cook v. Seneca County Board of Commissioners

    175 Ohio App. 3d 721 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 25, 2008

    Mitchell v. … Network, Inc. v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Dove v. Allen County Educational Service Center Governing Board

    118 Ohio App. 3d 102 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 5, 1997

    Thomas v. Newark City School Dist. Bd. of Edn. (1994), 71 Ohio St.3d 251 , 643 N.E.2d 131 . … Thus, the board was free to consider all the testimony presented as long as “the discretion to consider hearsay evidence [was not] exercised in an arbitrary manner.” Day Lay Egg Farm v. Union Cty.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Princeton City School District v. Ohio State Board of Education

    96 Ohio App. 3d 558 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 17, 1994

    board and the superintendent. … Concerning school boards specifically, the Ohio Supreme Court has recognized a particular need to allow the legislature to delegate broad powers. Ohio Assn. of Public School Employees v. Stark Cty.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Levy v. University of Cincinnati

    84 Ohio App. 3d 342 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 16, 1992

    Further, because U.C. has a formal tenure system, the only way that tenure may be obtained is by formal granting of the board of directors. See Omlor v. … See Parnell v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Woerner v. Mentor Exempted Village School District Board of Education

    84 Ohio App. 3d 844 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 4, 1993

    . *846 v. … Columbus v. Hodge (1987), 37 Ohio App.3d 68 , 523 N.E.2d 515 .

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Stipe v. Summit County Board of Education

    23 Ohio App. 329 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 10, 1926

    Brenner, v. Bd. of Edn., 97 Ohio St., 336 , 120 N. … Bd. of Edn. v. Bd. of Edn., 104 Ohio St., 75 , 135 N.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Katz v. Maple Heights City School District Board of Education

    87 Ohio App. 3d 256 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 19, 1993

    Jones v. Franklin Cty. Sheriff (1990), 52 Ohio St.3d 40, 43 , 555 N.E.2d 940, 944 , citing Aldridge, 38 Ohio St.3d at 157 , 527 N.E.2d at 293 , and Graziano v. … Huffman v. Hair Surgeon, Inc. (1985), 19 Ohio St.3d 83, 87 , 19 OBR 123, 126, 482 N.E.2d 1248, 1252 ; Blakemore v. Blakemore (1983), 5 Ohio St.3d 217, 219 , 5 OBR 481, 482, 450 N.E.2d 1140, 1142 .

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Board of Education of Cleveland City School District v. Hecht

    102 Ohio App. 521 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 14, 1955

    The school board is appropriating the northerly two and one-half acres having a frontage of 175 feet on East 162nd Street and extending back 661 feet. … E. (2d), 387; Railroad Co. v. Perkins, 49 Ohio St., 326 , 31 N. E., 350 ; Miami Conservancy District v. Bowers, 100 Ohio St., 317 , 125 N. E., 876 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Duff v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth.

    100 N.E.3d 1144 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 7, 2017

    No. 2016-00445) v. … Brown v. Levin, 10th Dist. No. 11AP-349, 2012-Ohio-5768; Robinson v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr., 10th Dist. No. 10AP-550, 2011-Ohio-713, ¶ 5.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Binder v. Board of County Commissioners

    91 Ohio Law. Abs. 428 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 11, 1962

    Toth et al, v. … Toth, v. Board of County Commissioners, the petition for the writ of mandamus must be allowed, and the writ is ordered issued as prayed for.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Board of County Commrs. of Cuyahoga Co.

    32 Ohio App. 382 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 13, 1929

    We are referred to the case of State of Ohio ex rel Landis v. Board of County Commissioners of Butler County, 95 OS. 157 . … In the case of Slinguff v. Weaver, 66 OS. 621 , the Supreme Court in clear language set forth rules of guidance for the construction of a statute.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Vander v. Board of County Commrs.

    100 Ohio App. 109 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 26, 1953

    Section 6602-17 empowers the commissioners to construct, maintain and operate any public water or waterworks system within their respective counties and empowers the board to make, publish and enforce rules and regulations … Gerspacher, v. Coffinberry, 157 Ohio St., 32 , 104 N. E. (2d), 1; State, ex rel. Shafer, v. Ohio Turnpike Comm., 159 Ohio St., 581 , 113 N. E. (2d), 14. In support of their contention, relators cite Springmyer v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Cafe Tia Juana, Inc. v. Board of Liquor Control

    81 Ohio Law. Abs. 53 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 25, 1956

    This is a law appeal from a judgment of the Common Pleas Court reversing an order of the Board of Liquor Control revoking the appellee’s class D-l, D-2, D-3 and D-3a Liquor permits. … It will be noted that the cause was heard upon a transcript of the proceedings had before the Board and additional testimony taken in the Common Pleas Court.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Dean v. Board of Trustees of Soldiers & Sailors Memorial Bldg.

    65 Ohio App. 362 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 12, 1940

    Following the argument of Judge Lieghley in the case of City of Cleveland v. Walker, Admx., 52 Ohio App., 477, 481 , 3 N. … We are unwilling to subscribe to the proposition that simply because the board of township trustees' is a public body and the Board of Trustees of the Soldiers and Sailors Memorial Building is a body authorized by statute

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Schumacher v. State Teachers Retirement Board

    65 Ohio App. 3d 623 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 14, 1989

    R.C. 3307.01(V)(1). It has also enumerated items that do not constitute compensation. R.C. 3307.-01(V)(2). … Will v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Board of Edn. of Chillicothe v. S-W Co.

    16 Ohio App. 2d 7 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 26, 1968

    In Kutsche v. Ford, 222 Mich. 442 , 192 N. … No. 1 v. Gumbs, 191 N. Y. S. 2d 183; Kemp v. United States, 38 F. Supp. 568 ; 70 A. L. R. 2d 1375; Bd. of Edn. of Floyd County v. Hooper (Ky. Court of Appeals), 350 S. W. 2d 629 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • OPUS III-VII Corp. v. Ohio State Board of Pharmacy

    109 Ohio App. 3d 102 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 1, 1996

    McLean v. Indus. Comm. (1986), 25 Ohio St.3d 90 , 25 OBR 141, 495 N.E.2d 370 . … Motors Corp. v. Tracy (1995), 73 Ohio St.3d 29, 30 , 652 N.E.2d 188, 189 .

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Blair v. Milford Exempted Village School District Board of Education

    62 Ohio App. 3d 424 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 6, 1989

    No. 85CA98, unreported, 1986 WL 8924 ; Swanson v. Ohio Bell Tel. Co. (Dec. 4, 1980), Cuyahoga App. No. 983, 232, unreported. In Brown v. Whirlpool Corp. (Sept. 1, 1987), Marion App. … The cases construing R.C. 3319.081(C) involve an employee who was, without dispute, entitled to continuing contract status, but contests a disciplinary action by the board. See, e.g., Mayes v. Western Brown Loc.

    Abrogated in part, on other grounds by Coolidge v. Riverdale Local School District, 100 Ohio St. 3d 141 (2003)Cited 10 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.