Case law

Cafe Tia Juana, Inc. v. Board of Liquor Control

81 Ohio Law. Abs. 53 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 25, 1956

This is a law appeal from a judgment of the Common Pleas Court reversing an order of the Board of Liquor Control revoking the appellee’s class D-l, D-2, D-3 and D-3a Liquor permits. … It will be noted that the cause was heard upon a transcript of the proceedings had before the Board and additional testimony taken in the Common Pleas Court.

Laughlin v. Columbia County Board of Education

90 Ohio Law. Abs. 496 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 9, 1959

We believe the facts in the case we review are governed by the case of County Board of Education of Hancock County v. … The constitutionality of Section 4736, General Code (now Section 3311.26, Revised Code), was upheld by the supreme court in Kneale v. Jennings et al., Board of Education of Cuyahoga County, 111 Ohio St., 637 .

Harper v. Franklin County Child Welfare Board

69 Ohio Law. Abs. 137 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 3, 1954

Melvin with the consent and approval of said defendant Board. … “And later, that a judgment is ‘entitled to full faith and credit until reversed or modified, Fishman v. Bricker, 19 Abs 528 , whether the facts before the Court warranted the judgment or not.’ Hill v. Buchanan, 6 O.

Plain Twp. Bd. of Trustees v. Bd. of Commrs., 2007 Ca 00144 (8-26-2008)

2008 Ohio 4348 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 26, 2008

Henley v. City of Youngstown Bd. … Middletown v.

Cox v. Bureau of Emp. Serv.

2 Ohio App. Unrep. 221 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 12, 1990

The decision of purely factual questions is primarily within the province of the referee and the board of review. … Brown-Brockemyer Co. v. Roach (1947), 48 Ohio St. 511 . Appellant's assignments of error should be overruled on the authority of Brown-Brockemyer Co. v. Roach, supra.

Buie v. Chippewa Local School District Board of Education

93 Ohio App. 3d 434 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 16, 1994

A. G. & G. Co. v. Cuyahoga County Board of Revision

47 Ohio App. 3d 117 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 2, 1988

When appellant did not timely file its assignment of error and brief, the appellee Parma School Board moved to dismiss the appeal on July 16, 1987. … In this case, as in Hawkins v.

Prete v. Akron City School District Board of Education

106 Ohio App. 3d 761 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 13, 1995

In its judgment entry, the common pleas court reasoned that adoption of the board’s argument would not be consistent with the legislature’s apparent intent: “There is no evidence that § 3319.39 was enacted with the intent … I would overrule the board’s assignment of error and affirm the common pleas court.

State Ex Rel. Cochran v. Boardman Township Board of Trustees

196 Ohio App. 3d 185 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 19, 2011

Dorrian v. … Crabtree v. Franklin Cty.

Local Union 1886 v. Ohio Reclamation Board of Review

116 Ohio App. 3d 371 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 19, 1996

The preliminary issue raised by the Reclamation Board and intervenor SOCC is whether UMW has standing to challenge the Reclamation Board’s jurisdiction. In State ex rel. Matasy v. … Ohio Coal Co. v.

University of Cincinnati, University Hospital v. State Employment Relations Board

42 Ohio App. 3d 78 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 23, 1988

the University of Cincinnati, University Hospital (“University”), 1 to bargain with the intervenor-appellee, the Ohio Nurses Association (“ONA”), 2 as ordered by the complainant-appellee, the State Employment Relations Board … At the conclusion of the hearing, the hearing examiner recommended that the board issue an order requiring the University to: “1.

State Ex Rel. Cook v. Seneca County Board of Commissioners

175 Ohio App. 3d 721 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 25, 2008

Mitchell v. … Network, Inc. v.

Steingass Mechanical Contracting, Inc. v. Warrensville Heights Board of Education

151 Ohio App. 3d 321 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 9, 2003

of Cincinnati’s Paul Brown Stadium. … Centers v. Ohio Dept. of Adm. Serv. (1988), 49 Ohio App.3d 99, 106 , 550 N.E. 2d 955 . 6 . Monarch Constr. Co. v.

MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. Board of Franklin County Commissioners

127 Ohio App. 3d 127 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 31, 1998

In Wilson Bennett, Inc. v. … In Cedar Bay Constr., Inc. v.

State ex rel. Waldron v. Board of County Commissioners

83 Ohio Law. Abs. 97 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 27, 1959

In the case of Myron Berlin et al, as Trustees of Liberty Township v. … The refusal of the Board of County Commissioners to act as petitioned by plaintiffs is based on its contention that the language of §503.09 R.

Bennett v. Diefenbach

113 Ohio App. 302 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 2, 1960

Commrs. of Sinking Fund, v. Brown, Secy. of State, 167 Ohio St., 71 , 146 N. … In the Brown case the court referred to the part of the third paragraph of the syllabus in Thrailkill, a Taxpayer, v. Smith, Secy. of State, 106 Ohio St., 1 , 138 N.

Mahoning County Citizen's Club v. Board of Liquor Control

110 Ohio App. 549 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 13, 1959

The club had also been before the board on other matters prior to 1949. The club’s permit was revoked by the board under date of December 9,1936. … final order of the Board of Liquor Control.

State ex rel. Weintrob v. State Board of Optometry

14 Ohio Law. Abs. 553 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 17, 1933

The above mentioned exaxminations were in writing upon examination papers which were distributed among the members of the Board, who graded the papers and forwarded the result of such grading to the Secretary of the Board … Counsel for respondents frankly admit that the request for the execution of this affidavit by the President of the Board was unwarranted. The President of the Board claims to have acted upon the advice of counsel.

Gates v. Board of Education of River Local School District

8 Ohio App. 2d 76 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 11, 1966

There is nothing in this statute that expressly covers the situation where no express contract was made between the board of education and the employee. … Stine, v. McCaw, Chief, 137 Ohio St. 13 , approved and followed.) ” See 9 Ohio Jurisprudence 2d 433, Civil Service, Section 102. In DeRemer v.

Dove v. Allen County Educational Service Center Governing Board

118 Ohio App. 3d 102 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 5, 1997

Thomas v. Newark City School Dist. Bd. of Edn. (1994), 71 Ohio St.3d 251 , 643 N.E.2d 131 . … Thus, the board was free to consider all the testimony presented as long as “the discretion to consider hearsay evidence [was not] exercised in an arbitrary manner.” Day Lay Egg Farm v. Union Cty.