Case law

Beaver Excavating Co. v. Stark County Board of Elections

78 Ohio App. 3d 20 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 26, 1992

Stanley v. Bernon (1933), 127 Ohio St. 204 , 187 N.E. 733 ; State ex rel. Smith v. Hummel (1946), 146 Ohio St. 341 , 32 O.O. 416 , 66 N.E.2d 111 ; State ex rel. Newell v. … Brown (1954), 162 Ohio St. 147 , 54 O.O. 392 , 122 N.E.2d 105 ; State ex rel. Graham v. Bd. of Elections (1979), 60 Ohio St.2d 123, 125 , 14 O.O.3d 349, 350 , 397 N.E.2d 1204, 1205 .

CADO Business Systems of Ohio, Inc. v. Board of Education

8 Ohio App. 3d 385 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 24, 1983

Ohio boards of education are purely creations of statute. Their authority to act is derived from and strictly limited to that granted them by statute. Brownfield, Bowen, Bally & Sturtz v. … Carmean, v.

Oriti v. Board of Review, Ohio Bureau of Employment Services

7 Ohio App. 3d 311 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 31, 1983

the court has impermissibly substituted its judgment for that of the Board of Review. … In Baker v.

Goebel's Emergency Medical Service, Inc. v. Board of Commissioners

58 Ohio App. 3d 25 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 9, 1989

(“GEMS”), filed a complaint against appellee, the Board of Commissioners of Sandusky County (“county commissioners”), seeking an injunction and damages. … Romeo v. Bd. of Cty. Commrs. (1978), 64 Ohio App. 2d 269, 269-270 , 18 O.O. 3d 231, 413 N.E. 2d 1210, 1211 .

Red Garter, Inc. v. Cleveland Board of Zoning Appeals

100 Ohio App. 3d 177 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 17, 1995

In Lawson v. … Mgmt., Inc. v.

State v. Curtis

2015 Ohio 3404 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 24, 2015

This court affirmed the trial court's decision in State v. Curtis, 12th Dist. Brown No. … State v. Brown, 119 Ohio St.3d 447, 2008-Ohio-4569, at ¶ 41-43.

Cleveland Trinidad Paving Co. v. Board of County Commissioners

15 Ohio App. 3d 66 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 16, 1984

Furthermore, R.C. 305.25 provides the following: “No contract entered into by the board of county commissioners, or order made by it, shall be valid unless it has been assented to at a regular or special session of the board … CADO Business Systems of Ohio, Inc. v. Bd. of Edn. (1983), 8 Ohio App. 3d 385 .

Mercure v. Board of Education of Columbiana School District

49 Ohio App. 2d 409 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 27, 1976

Ach, v. … See Miller v. Korns (1923), 107 Ohio St. 287 . • .' In City of Xenia v.

Northeast Ohio Emergency Affiliates v. Ohio State Medical Board

93 Ohio App. 3d 1 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 3, 1994

Of course, in reviewing a medical board order courts should accord due deference to the board’s interpretation of the technical and ethical requirements of its profession. Pons v. Ohio State Med. … In this regard, the board reads this court’s decision in Martin v. Children’s Hosp. (Apr. 29, 1980), Franklin App.

Plain Twp. Bd. of Trustees v. Bd. of Commrs., 2007 Ca 00144 (8-26-2008)

2008 Ohio 4348 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 26, 2008

Henley v. City of Youngstown Bd. … Middletown v.

Perry v. Buckeye Community Services

48 Ohio App. 3d 140 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 12, 1988

McKay v. McKay Tire Stores, Inc. (App. 1938), 29 Ohio Law Abs. 304 . In a board of review hearing before a referee, the referee is the trier of fact. Brown-Brockmeyer Co. v. … The court may not substitute its judgment for that of the Board of Review as to the facts and may not reverse simply because it interprets the evidence differently than did the Board of Review. Brown-Brockmeyer Co. v.

Plain Twp. Bd. of Trustees v. Bd. of Commiss., 2007-Ca-000063 (7-14-2008)

2008 Ohio 6346 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 14, 2008

Middletown v. … Watson v.

State Ex Rel. Klein v. Cuyahoga County Board of Elections

102 Ohio App. 3d 124 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 1, 1995

After that time the board of elections has no duty to consider protests. In Pierce v. … Whetsel v.

Joseph Oker Sons Co. v. Cincinnati

45 Ohio App. 466 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 20, 1933

That to entitle it to equitable relief it must first have pursued its legal remedy, has clearly been decided by the Supreme Court of Ohio in the case of Bashore v Brown, Treas., 108 Oh St, 18, 140 NE, 489 . … The court in the opinion in Bashore v Brown, Treas, at page 23, cites with approval and quotes the following from the case of San Joaquin, etc., Irrigation Co. v County of Stanislaus, 155 Cal., 21 , 99 P., 365 : “It is held

Board of Education v. Dayton Education Ass'n

80 Ohio App. 3d 758 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 2, 1992

(“board”). … The board relies on State ex rel. Ocasek v.

Doctors Hospital v. Board of Tax Appeals

90 Ohio Law. Abs. 216 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 5, 1961

The Board’s opinion indicated that it had been guided in its determination by two Supreme Court cases, The Aultman Hospital Assn., v. Evatt, Tax Commr., 140 Ohio St., 114 , and The Western Reserve Academy v. … Board of Tax Appeals, et al., 153 Ohio St., 133 .

Micro Lapping & Grinding Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

20 Ohio App. 3d 356 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 26, 1984

Joreski v. State of Ohio Unemp. Comp. [Bd.] (Dec. 1,1982), Medina App. No. 1174, unreported; Hannah v. Ohio Bur. of Emp. Services (Mar. 2, 1983), Summit App. No. 10914, unreported. … McCruter v. Bd. of Review (1980), 64 Ohio St. 2d 277 [ 18 O.O.3d 463 ]. Ill Appellant’s assignment of error is well-taken.

Jones v. Perry Township Board of Education

7 Ohio Law. Abs. 460 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 14, 1929

Schwing v McClure, 7 Abs 255 . … And tho we were satisfied that no lease had been made the testimony referred to indicates a permissive use of the property by the board of education, granted by the land owner and accepted and enjoyed by the board of education

Krutowsky v. Simonson

109 Ohio App. 3d 367 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 14, 1996

. *369 Simonson apparently did business as Simonson’s Brown Lane USA and was president of Wood Works, Ltd. Simonson and Wood Works are located in Taylorville, Illinois. Wood Works is incorporated under Illinois law. … Cincinnati Art Galleries v. Fatzie (1990), 70 Ohio App.3d 696, 699 , 591 N.E.2d 1336, 1338 , quoting S. Machine Co. v. Mohasco Industries, Inc.

Mahoning County Citizen's Club v. Board of Liquor Control

110 Ohio App. 549 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 13, 1959

The club had also been before the board on other matters prior to 1949. The club’s permit was revoked by the board under date of December 9,1936. … final order of the Board of Liquor Control.