Case law

Bruder v. Public Utilities Commission

14 Ohio St. 2d 24 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 27, 1968

Motor Transportation, Inc., v. Pub. Util. Comm. (1939), 135 Ohio St. 145 , 19 N. E. 2d 956; Jones v. Pub. Util. Comm. (1943), 141 Ohio St. 237 , 47 N. E. 2d 780 . … J., ZxmmebmaN, Matthias, O’Neill, Herbert, SchNeider and BrowN, JJ., concur.

Bennett v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Correction

60 Ohio St. 3d 107 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 5, 1991

See Hahn v. Brown (1976), 51 Ohio App. 2d 177, 179 , 5 O.O. 3d 323, 325, 367 N.E. 2d 884, 886 . However, the rationale used in these appellate cases has been, in effect, overruled by this court’s holding in Reynolds v. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur. Wright, J., not participating.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Mesi

72 Ohio St. 3d 45 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 19, 1995

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. MESI. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Mesi, 1995-Ohio-69.] … The board's recommended sanction, however, is not appropriate. {¶ 6} We, like the court in Office of Disciplinary Counsel v.

Ressler v. Ressler

17 Ohio St. 3d 17 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 24, 1985

In Colizoli v. … Brown and Douglas, JJ., concur. Celebrezze, C.J., and Ford, J., dissent. Ford, J., of the Eleventh Appellate District, sitting for Locher, J.

Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Nusbaum

93 Ohio St. 3d 150 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 15, 2001

CLEVELAND BAR ASSOCIATION v. NUSBAUM. [Cite as Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Nusbaum, 2001-Ohio-1305.] … , and recommendation of the board.

Rubbermaid, Inc. v. Wayne County Auditor

95 Ohio St. 3d 358 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 29, 2002

While the complaint was pending, this court decided Sharon Village, Ltd. v. Licking Cty. … Bd. of Edn. v. Hamilton Cty. Bd. of Revision (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 308, 316 , 744 N.E.2d 751 (the “Mirge” decision), quoting State v.

Horton v. United Ohio Ins.

62 Ohio St. 3d 1464 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 20, 1991

Cos. v. Alexander, Summit County, No. 14531; briefing schedule stayed. H. Brown, J., dissents.

Toledo Bar Assn. v. Palmer

90 Ohio St. 3d 458 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 26, 2000

TOLEDO BAR ASSOCIATION v. PALMER. [Cite as Toledo Bar Assn. v. Palmer, 2000-Ohio-95.] … Respondent failed to answer but filed a letter with the Board of Commissioners on the Unauthorized Practice of Law (“board”) admitting the allegations set forth in the complaint. Pursuant to Gov.Bar R.

Moss v. Dept. of Natural Resources

62 Ohio St. 2d 138 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 7, 1980

Brown, J. The central issue in this appeal concerns the applicability of R. C. 1533.181 to the facts of this cause. R. … Continental Can Co. v. Donahue (1966), 5 Ohio St. 2d 224, 227 .

Disciplinary Counsel v. Duff

168 Ohio St. 3d 1215 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 6, 2022

[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Duff, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2022-Ohio-1890.] DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. DUFF. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. … V(14)(A), the Board of Professional Conduct filed with this court a certification of default, alleging that respondent, Michael James Duff, failed to file an answer to a formal complaint pending before the board.

Middleton v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision

72 Ohio St. 3d 1549 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 28, 1995

Board of Tax Appeals, No. 94-K-468. On motion to consolidate case with 94-2399, Middleton v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision, Board of Tax Appeals, No. 93-G-1407, and 94-2109, Middleton v. Cuyahoga Cty. … Bd. of Revision, Board of Tax Appeals, No. 94-P-158. Motion denied. Cook, J., dissents.

Fouss v. Bowers

171 Ohio St. (N.S.) 226 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 13, 1960

It is not the function of this court to substitute its judgment for that of the board on factual issues but only to determine from an examination of the entire recGrd whether the decision reached by the board is unreasonable … Hercules Galion Products, Inc., v. Bowers, Tax Commr., 171 Ohio St., 176 ; Standard, Oil Co. v. Peck, Tax Commr., 163 Ohio St., 63 .

Disciplinary Counsel v. Nicholson

82 Ohio St. 3d 1435 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 4, 1998

V(9)(K) wherein it reinstated respondent, Thomas G. Nicholson, a.k.a. Thomas Graham Nicholson, to the practice of law. … Upon consideration thereof, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that respondent’s request for an extension of time to pay board costs is granted and that respondent pay board costs in full, including any and all

Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Reisenfeld

84 Ohio St. 3d 30 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 18, 1998

CINCINNATI BAR ASSOCIATION v. REISENFELD. (TWO CASES.) [Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Reisenfeld, 1998-Ohio-307.] … Bar Assn. v.

Turner v. Turner

62 Ohio St. 3d 1495 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1992

Sua sponte, cause held for decision in 90-2187, Bowen v. Kil-Kare, Inc., Greene County, No. 89-CA-84; briefing schedule stayed. Sweeney, Wright and H. Brown, JJ., dissent.

State ex rel. McMaster v. School Employees Retirement System

69 Ohio St. 3d 130 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 27, 1994

Rock v. Cabral (1993), 67 Ohio St.3d 108, 112 , 616 N.E.2d 218, 222 . … Cf., e.g., State v.

Wolfe v. Wolfe

46 Ohio St. 2d 399 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 23, 1976

Brown, J. … Thacker v. Bd. of Trustees of Ohio St. Univ. (1973), 35 Ohio St. 2d 49, 67-71 . (William B. Brown, J., dissenting.) In DeWitt v.

TBC Westlake, Inc. v. Hamilton Cty. Bd. of Revision

81 Ohio St. 3d 58 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 10, 1998

TBC WESTLAKE, INC., APPELLEE, v. HAMILTON COUNTY BOARD OF REVISION; RHODES, HAMILTON COUNTY AUDITOR, ET AL., APPELLANTS. [Cite as TBC Westlake, Inc. v. Hamilton Cty. Bd. of Revision, 1998-Ohio-445.] … Privacy provides an opportunity for candid discussion between board members and staff on the legal issues and the facts so the BTA can reach a sound decision. See Nasrallah v.

Clendenen v. Industrial Commission

140 Ohio St. 414 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 18, 1942

Weinberger, v. … The jury in such cases sits as an appellate Board of Awards * * * . “3.

Leader v. Glander

149 Ohio St. 1 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 14, 1948

The question at issue is made clear from a statement in the finding made by the Board of. … Lytle v. Baldinger, 84 Ohio St., 1 , 95 N. E., 389 ; County Board of Education of Hancock County v. Boehm, 102 Ohio St., 292 , 131 N. E., 812 .