Opinion

Bruder v. Public Utilities Commission

14 Ohio St. 2d 24
43 Ohio Op. 2d 13
235 N.E.2d 238
1968 Ohio LEXIS 411

Court: Ohio Supreme Court
Filed: Mar 27, 1968
Status: Published
On the bench: Brown, Herbert, Matthias, Neill, Schneider, Taft, Zxmmebman
Cited by: 1 cases
Authority: More cited than 59.4%

The opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant’s contention, that Rule 1.04 (d) of the Rules and Regulations of the Public Utilities Commission is invalid on the ground that it violates Section 16 of Article I of the Ohio Constitution and the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution is without merit.

Upon consideration of the record, this court holds that the order of the commission denying applicant’s application *25 is neither unreasonable nor unlawful. Section 4903.13, Revised Code; H. & K. Motor Transportation, Inc., v. Pub. Util. Comm. (1939), 135 Ohio St. 145 , 19 N. E. 2d 956; Jones v. Pub. Util. Comm. (1943), 141 Ohio St. 237 , 47 N. E. 2d 780 .

Therefore, the order of the Public Utilities Commission is affirmed.

Order affirmed.

Taft, C. J., ZxmmebmaN, Matthias, O’Neill, Herbert, SchNeider and BrowN, JJ., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.