Case law

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Friedman

56 Ohio St. 3d 69 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 12, 1990

V(44), we hereby publicly reprimand respondent for his conduct. Costs taxed to respondent. Judgment accordingly. Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur. Douglas, J., not participating.

State ex rel. Parker v. Russo

131 Ohio St. 3d 175 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 15, 2012

Parker v. Russo, 131 Ohio St.3d 175, 2012-Ohio-541.] THE STATE EX REL. PARKER, APPELLANT, v. RUSSO, JUDGE, APPELLEE. [Cite as State ex rel. Parker v. Russo, 131 Ohio St.3d 175, 2012-Ohio-541.] … O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, CUPP, and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., concur.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Romer

2026 Ohio 1117 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 31, 2026

[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Romer, 2026-Ohio-1117.] DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. ROMER. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Romer, 2026-Ohio-1117.] … V(25)(E), respondent's petition for reinstatement was referred to the Board of Professional Conduct.

State ex rel. Dodson v. Industrial Commission

58 Ohio St. 2d 399 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 20, 1979

Niles, v. Bernard (1978), 53 Ohio St. 2d 31, 33 . In paragraph one of the syllabus in Zavatsky v. … Brown, Sweeney, Locher and Holmes, JJ., concur.

Jenkins v. Billy

43 Ohio St. 3d 84 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 17, 1989

Bland v. Holden (1970), 21 Ohio St. 2d 238, 239 , 50 O.O. 2d 477, 257 N.E. 2d 397, 398 . … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Dayton Bar Ass'n v. O'Brien

103 Ohio St. 3d 1 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 11, 2004

.” {¶ 2} A three-member panel of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline recommended a six-month stayed suspension and upon review, the entire board recommended a public reprimand. … Ohio State Bar Assn. v. Consoldane (1977), 50 Ohio St.2d 337 , 4 O.O.3d 477 , 364 N.E.2d 279 .

Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Candiello

85 Ohio St. 3d 36 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 10, 1999

We adopt the findings of the board. … Nevertheless, for reasons which we expressed in Disciplinary Counsel v.

Toledo Bar Assn. v. Palmer

90 Ohio St. 3d 458 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 26, 2000

TOLEDO BAR ASSOCIATION v. PALMER. [Cite as Toledo Bar Assn. v. Palmer, 2000-Ohio-95.] … Respondent failed to answer but filed a letter with the Board of Commissioners on the Unauthorized Practice of Law (“board”) admitting the allegations set forth in the complaint. Pursuant to Gov.Bar R.

Freshour v. Radcliff

35 Ohio St. 3d 181 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 24, 1988

Westchester, v. Bacon (1980), 61 Ohio St. 2d 42 , 15 O.O. 3d 53, 399 N.E. 2d 81 , paragraph one of the syllabus. Clearly, appellant could not and cannot sustain this burden. … Brown, JJ., concur.

Karb v. State

54 Ohio St. (N.S.) 383 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 31, 1896

act — pensioning firemen — is of a general nature, and it seems to be so, it is difficult to maintain the constitutionality of the act, in view of the recent decision of this court in the ease of the City of Cincinnati v. … Failure of the board to act, would not supply the place of favorable action by the board, because upon acting on the application, the board might find and determine that the alleged disability was not “ caused in, or induced

Freshour v. Tate

62 Ohio St. 3d 410 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 29, 1992

Parker v. Maxwell (1963), 174 Ohio St. 471 , 473, 23 O.O.2d 116 , 117, 190 N.E.2d 271 , 273. The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed. Judgment affirmed. Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Standard Oil Co. v. Zangerle

144 Ohio St. 523 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 7, 1945

The Board of Tax Appeals classified them all as real property. The Standard Oil Company operates two refineries *525 in the city of Cleveland. … However, the board announced a finding “that such equipment is realty,” stating as a reason for such finding, “the broad language used by the Supreme Court,” in Case Manufacturing Co. v. Garven, 45 Ohio St., 289 , 13 N.

Burlingame v. Estate of Burlingame

134 Ohio St. 3d 490 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 6, 2012

[Cite as Burlingame v. Estate of Burlingame, 134 Ohio St.3d 490, 2012-Ohio-5698.] BURLINGAME, APPELLEE, v. ESTATE OF BURLINGAME ET AL., APPELLEES; COOMBS ET AL., APPELLANTS. … O’CONNOR, C.J., and LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, CUPP, and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., concur.

Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. Newman

102 Ohio St. 3d 186 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 12, 2004

Columbus Bar Assn. v. Ewing (1996), 75 Ohio St.3d 244 , 661 N.E.2d 1109 . … Thus, we consider this case similar to Toledo Bar Assn. v.

State Ex Rel. Flask v. Collins

148 Ohio St. 45 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 23, 1947

In the case of McCullers v. Board of Commrs. of Wake County, 158 N. C., 75 , 73 S. E., 816 , Ann. … In Mack v. Polonko, 118 N. J.

Crock Constr. Co. v. Stanley Miller Constr. Co.

65 Ohio St. 3d 1455 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 18, 1992

Co. v. Stanley Miller Constr. Co., Noble County, No. 206. Motion granted. H. Brown, J., would grant the alternative relief of extension.

In re First National Bank

37 Ohio St. 2d 60 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 13, 1974

In the case of Dickerson v. Camden Trust Co. (1949), 1 N. … Brown, JJ., concur. Herbert, Stern and P. Brown, JJ., dissent.

Bonham v. Taylor

10 Ohio St. 108 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1840

Dartmouth College v. Woodward, 4 Wheat. 518 ; Comm’rs Gallia Co. v. Holcomb, 7 Ohio, 232, pt. 2. … The agreed case shows there had been no full compliance with this provision, but a board on the west side of the river, and at the west end of the bridge only.

Clendenen v. Industrial Commission

140 Ohio St. 414 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 18, 1942

Weinberger, v. … The jury in such cases sits as an appellate Board of Awards * * * . “3.

Dayton Bar Assn. v. Wilcoxson

150 Ohio St. 3d 1274 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 12, 2017

V(14)(A), the Board of Professional Conduct filed with this court a certification of default, alleging that respondent, Clinton Ralph Wilcoxson II, failed to file an answer to a formal complaint pending before the board. … V(17)(D)(1) and that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(2).