Case law

State ex rel. Mango v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.

169 Ohio St. 3d 32 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 11, 2022

See Black v. … State v.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Lynch

1994 Ohio 253 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 22, 1994

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Lynch. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Lynch (1994), Ohio St.3d .] … The board adopted the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the panel; however, the board recommended that we suspend respondent from the practice of law for six months without any stay.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Camera

1994 Ohio 199 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 22, 1994

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Camera. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Camera (1994), Ohio St.3d .] Attorneys at law -- Misconduct -- Indefinite suspension -- Conviction for perjury. … V(9)(a)(iii). One member of the panel recommended that respondent be indefinitely suspended from the practice of law. The board adopted the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the panel.

Snider v. Zaino

98 Ohio St. 3d 1508 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 2, 2003

Board of Tax Appeals, Nos. 02-A-137, 02-A-138, and 02-A-329. Sua sponte, cause consolidated for argument and decision with 2002-1276, DeWeese v. … Zaino, Board of Tax Appeals, Nos. 02-A-144, 02-A-145, and 02-A-327, and 2002-1277, Yoder v. Zaino, Board of Tax Appeals, Nos. 02-A-140, 02-A-141, and 02-A-328.

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Koury

90 Ohio St. 3d 1233 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 28, 2000

V(10)(F), respondent’s petition for reinstatement was referred to the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline. … V(7)(b) (now Gov.Bar R. V[6][B][2]). On consideration thereof and the Final Report of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline, IT IS ORDERED by the court that the respondent, Laurice M. Koury, a.k.a.

State ex rel. Dix v. Angelotta

18 Ohio St. 3d 115 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 3, 1985

Woodbury, v. Spitler (1973), 34 Ohio St. 2d 134 [ 63 O.O.2d 229 ], syllabus. … Brown, Douglas and Wright, JJ., concur. R.C. 2945.71(C)(2) mandates that a person charged with a felony shall be brought to trial within two hundred seventy days after his arrest.

Mason v. Public Utilities Commission

34 Ohio St. 2d 21 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 18, 1973

Motor Freight v. Pub. Util. Comm. (1932), 125 Ohio St. 617 ; D. G. & U. Truck Lines v. Pub. Util. Comm. (1953), 158 Ohio St. 564 . … Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur. Corrigan, J., dissents.

Greene County Bar Ass'n v. Fodal

92 Ohio St. 3d 99 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 13, 2001

The Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline (“board”) assigned number 99-63 to the case. Respondent failed to file an answer. … V(4)(G) (failing to cooperate in a disciplinary investigation), and with respect to the Parnell matter DR 1-102(A)(4) (engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation).

State ex rel. McMinn v. Whitfield

27 Ohio St. 3d 4 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 5, 1986

Coss, v. Hoddinott (1968), 16 Ohio St. 2d 163, 164 [ 45 O.O.2d 489 ]. … Brown, Douglas and Wright, JJ., concur.

State ex rel. Hart v. Turner

132 Ohio St. 3d 479 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 24, 2012

Hart v. Turner, 132 Ohio St.3d 479, 2012-Ohio-3305.] THE STATE EX REL. HART, APPELLANT, v. TURNER, WARDEN, APPELLEE. [Cite as State ex rel. Hart v. Turner, 132 Ohio St.3d 479, 2012-Ohio-3305.] … O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, CUPP, and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., concur. __________________  SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

Disciplinary Counsel v. Hine

2026 Ohio 368 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 6, 2026

[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Hine, 2026-Ohio-368.] DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. HINE. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Hine, 2026-Ohio-368.] … V(14)(A), the Board of Professional Conduct filed with this court a certification of default, alleging that respondent, Katherine Hine, failed to file an answer to a formal complaint pending before the board.

Becker v. Shaull

62 Ohio St. 3d 480 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 12, 1992

. * * * ” Swoboda v. Brown (1935), 129 Ohio St. 512, 522 , 2 O.O. 516, 521 , 196 N.E. 274, 278 . … In Eisenhuth v.

State ex rel. Burch v. Morris

25 Ohio St. 3d 18 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 9, 1986

Moreover, in Anderson v. Maxwell (1967), 10 Ohio St. 2d 188 [ 39 O.O.2d 196 ], and Freeman v. … Brown, Douglas and Wright, JJ., concur.

C. F. Kettering, Inc. v. Evatt

144 Ohio St. 419 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 7, 1945

the amount or value of intangible property * * * owned or used in this state by * * * a *423 * * * foreign corporation the commission shall be guided by the provisions of Section 5328-1 and 5328-2 of the General Code * ’* V’ … The interpretation of the facts and the application of the law thereto as made by the Board of Tax Appeals may in our opinion be sustained, with one exception.

Williams v. State

124 Ohio St. 585 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 17, 1932

As the car was increasing its speed, the young woman in the front seat attempted to push Richards off of the running-board. … Hanson v. State, 43 Ohio St., 376 , 1 N. E., 136 , approved and followed. Judgment reversed. Jones, Matthias, Day and Allen, JJ., concur. Stephenson, J., not participating.

Winchester v. Pike

22 Ohio St. 3d 227 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 12, 1986

This cause on appeal from the court of appeals (case No. 10-196) is reversed on authority of Anson v. Tyree (1986), 22 Ohio St. 3d 223 , decided this date. Celebrezze, C.J., Locher, Holmes, C. … Brown, Douglas and Wright, JJ., concur. Sweeney, J., not participating.

Ohio State Bar Assn. v. Zuckerman

83 Ohio St. 3d 148 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 16, 1998

OHIO STATE BAR ASSOCIATION v. ZUCKERMAN. [Cite as Ohio State Bar Assn. v. Zuckerman, 1998-Ohio-125.] … of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Supreme Court (“board”).

State ex rel. Culgan v. Collier

132 Ohio St. 3d 394 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 5, 2012

Culgan v. Collier, 132 Ohio St.3d 394, 2012-Ohio-2916.] THE STATE EX REL. CULGAN, APPELLANT, v. COLLIER, JUDGE, APPELLEE. [Cite as State ex rel. Culgan v. Collier, 132 Ohio St.3d 394, 2012-Ohio-2916.] … Hudson v.

Corpline v. Hamilton Cty. Bd. of Revision

97 Ohio St. 3d 1212 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 6, 2002

CORPLINE, APPELLANT, V. HAMILTON COUNTY BOARD OF REVISION ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as Corpline v. Hamilton Cty. Bd. of Revision, 2002-Ohio-5805.] … Nevertheless, in the interests of justice and to facilitate the settlement of the parties, this cause is remanded to the Board of Tax Appeals with directions to remand this cause to the Hamilton County Board of Revision to

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Fortado

74 Ohio St. 3d 604 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 28, 1996

Fortado asks that we stay his entire two-year suspension, citing Disciplinary Counsel v. Casalinuovo (1993), 66 Ohio St.3d 367 , 613 N.E.2d 177 , and Disciplinary Counsel v. … V(4)(G), including the improper disbursement of $11,500 of a client’s funds and repeated failures to cooperate with relator’s investigation. Accordingly, we adopt the board’s findings, conclusions, and recommendation.