Case law

State ex rel. Hammond v. Industrial Commission

64 Ohio St. 2d 237 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 23, 1980

Young, v. Indus. Comm. (1942), 139 Ohio St. 601 , and State, ex rel. Vosnosky, v. Indus. … Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney, Locher and Holmes, JJ., concur. R.

Toledo Bar Assn. v. Ritson

94 Ohio St. 3d 411 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 27, 2002

TOLEDO BAR ASSOCIATION v. RITSON. [Cite as Toledo Bar Assn. v. Ritson, 2002-Ohio-1047.] … board’s decision.

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. King

74 Ohio St. 3d 612 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 28, 1996

We concur with the board’s findings that respondent violated DR 6-101(A)(3) and 1-102(A)(4). … Pfeifer, J., dissents and would adopt the recommendations of the panel and the board of a two-year suspension, stayed, with probation.

State ex rel. Abex Corp. v. Industrial Commission

74 Ohio St. 3d 125 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 29, 1995

Burley v. Coil Packing, Inc. (1987), 31 Ohio St.3d 18 , 31 OBR 70, 508 N.E.2d 936 . … Fultz v. Indus. Comm. (1994), 69 Ohio St.3d 327 , 631 N.E.2d 1057 .

State v. Hancock

48 Ohio St. 2d 147 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 8, 1976

See, State v. Breedlove (1971), 26 Ohio St. 2d 178 , 271 N. E. 2d 238 . See, also, State v. Jackson (1971), 26 Ohio St. 2d 74 , 269 N. E. 2d 118 ; and State v. Wilkinson (1971), 26 Ohio St. 2d 185 , 271 N. E. 2d 242 . … BrowN and P. Brown, JJ., concur.

Sopko v. Maxwell

3 Ohio St. 2d 123 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 14, 1965

Frisbie, Warden, v. Collins (1952), 342 U. S. 519 , 96 L. Ed. 541 , 72 S. Ct. 509 ; Ker v. Illinois (1886), 119 U. S. 436 , 30 L. Ed. 421 , 7 S. Ct. 225 ; Caldwell v. Haskins, Supt., 176 Ohio St. 261 ; and Henderson v. … J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Herbert, Schneider and Brown, JJ., concur.

Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Teaford

6 Ohio St. 2d 253 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1966

There was no finding as to the particluar and specific misconduct of the respondent which convinced the board to make its recommendation. … In re Disbarment of Lieberman, 163 Ohio St. 35 ; Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Fleck, 172 Ohio St. 467 .

Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Demore-Ford

93 Ohio St. 3d 417 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 3, 2001

V(4) (faffing to cooperate in investigation of disciplinary matter). … The board adopted the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendation of the Master Commissioner. We adopt the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the board.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Wallace

94 Ohio St. 3d 414 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 6, 2002

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. WALLACE. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Wallace, 2002-Ohio-1240.] … Disciplinary Counsel v. Wallace (2000), 89 Ohio St.3d 113, 729 N.E.2d 343.

Detling v. Chockley

70 Ohio St. 2d 134 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 9, 1982

Columbus Finance v. Howard, supra, at page 184; Rubeck v. … Brown, Acting C. J., Milligan, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown and Krupansky, JJ., concur. Milligan, J., of the Fifth Appellate District, sitting for Celebrezze, C. J.

Farmers Dairy Foods, Inc. v. Zaino

98 Ohio St. 3d 1507 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 2, 2003

Board of Tax Appeals, No. 97-R-167. Sua sponte, cause consolidated for argument and decision with 2002-1261, Dairy Farmers of Am., Inc. v. … Zaino, Board of Tax Appeals, No. 01-M-378, and 2002-1685, Dairy Farmers of Am., Inc. v. Zaino, Board of Tax Appeals, No. 98-P-366.

State v. Neubauer

75 Ohio St. 3d 1510 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 12, 1996

On motion to consolidate with 95-1271, State v. Miller, Auglaize County, No. 2-94-32; 95-1303, State v. Smith, Auglaize County, No. 2-95-3; 95-1304, State v. Brown, Auglaize County, No. 2-95-6; 95-1305, State v. … Roth, Auglaize County, *1511 No. 2-95-4; and 95-1307, State v. Bayman, Auglaize County, No. 2-95-7. Motion denied. Resnick, Cook and Stratton, JJ., dissent.

Krauter v. Maxwell

3 Ohio St. 2d 142 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 21, 1965

Brown, J. Petitioner raises several questions in his petition. … Brown v. Maxwell, Warden, 174 Ohio St. 29 ; Henderson v. Maxwell, Warden, 176 Ohio St. 187 ; Caldwell v. Haskins, Supt., 176 Ohio St. 261 .

Middleton v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision

74 Ohio St. 3d 228 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 10, 1996

MIDDLETON, APPELLANT, v. CUYAHOGA COUNTY BOARD OF REVISION ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as Middleton v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision, 1996-Ohio-97.] … Armstrong and Victor V. Anselmo, for appellee Cleveland Board of Education in case Nos. 94-2399 and 95- 300. Kelly, McCann & Livingstone and Robert A.

State Ex Rel. Martin v. Ohio Adult Parole Authority

126 Ohio St. 3d 506 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 6, 2010

Martin v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth., 126 Ohio St.3d 506, 2010-Ohio-4727.] THE STATE EX REL. MARTIN, APPELLANT, v. OHIO ADULT PAROLE AUTHORITY, APPELLEE. … BROWN, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, and CUPP, JJ., concur.

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Mesi

72 Ohio St. 3d 45 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 19, 1995

We concur in the board’s findings that respondent violated DR 1-102(A)(5) and (6), 5-105(B), 6-101(A)(3), and 9-102(A) and (B). The board’s recommended sanction, however, is not appropriate. … V(5). Restitution remains a condition for respondent’s reinstatement by operation of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(E)(1). Costs taxed to respondent. Judgment accordingly. Moyer, C.J., Wright, Resnick, F.E.

Cleveland Metro. Bar Assn. v. Hennessey (Slip Opinion)

164 Ohio St. 3d 437 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 10, 2021

Co. v. J.C. Penney Co., Inc., 27 Ohio St.3d 31, 34, 501 N.E.2d 617 (1986); Greenspan v. Third Fed. S. & L. … Cleveland Bar Assn. v.

Becker v. Shaull

62 Ohio St. 3d 480 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 12, 1992

. * * * ” Swoboda v. Brown (1935), 129 Ohio St. 512, 522 , 2 O.O. 516, 521 , 196 N.E. 274, 278 . … In Eisenhuth v.

State ex rel. Rose v. Garfield Heights Municipal Court

57 Ohio St. 2d 42 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 28, 1979

Gilligan, v. Hoddinott (1973), 36 Ohio St. 2d 127 , 304 N. E. 2d 382 . Paragraph one of the syllabus in State, ex rel. McKee, v. Cooper (1974), 40 Ohio St. 2d 65 , 320 N. … Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney, Locher and Holmes, JJ., concur. The purpose of the Rules of Superintendence (governing common pleas courts) is set forth in Sup. R. 1(A). It also describes the necessity for rules such as M. C.

Valentino v. Keller

17 Ohio St. 2d 21 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 19, 1969

See Cincinnati v. Bossert Machine Co., 16 Ohio St. 2d 76, 78 . Thus, as stated by Skeel, J., in Indianapolis & Southeastern Trailways, Inc., v. Cincinnati Street Ry. Co. (1957), 166 Ohio St. 310 , 317, 142 N. … Co. v. Helber (1915), 91 Ohio St. 231 , 110 N.