Case law

Office of Consumers' Counsel v. Public Utilities Commission

1 Ohio St. 3d 22 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 14, 1982

Western Reserve Transit v. Pub. Util. Comm. (1974), 39 Ohio St. 2d 16 [68 O.O. 2d 9]. … Brown, Sweeney, Holmes, C. Brown and Krupansky, JJ., concur.

State v. Cotton

56 Ohio St. 2d 8 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 4, 1978

State v. … Brown, Stephenson,- Sweeney and Lochee, JJ., concur. Leach, C. J., not participating. Stephenson, J., of the Fourth Appellate District, sitting for P. Brown, J.

Butler County Bar Ass'n v. McGee

142 Ohio St. 3d 111 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 18, 2015

Bar Assn. v. … Effective January 1, 2015, the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline has been renamed the Board of Professional Conduct. See Gov.Bar R. V(1)(A), 140 Ohio St.3d CII. . Effective January 1, 2015, Gov.Bar R.

State v. Renalist, Inc.

56 Ohio St. 2d 276 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 7, 1978

Dickman, v. Defenbacher, supra. … Brown, P. BrowN, SweeNey and Locher, JJ., concur. The Court of Appeals in State v. Watling (C. A.

Columbus Bar Assn. v. Reed

88 Ohio St. 3d 48 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 8, 2000

COLUMBUS BAR ASSOCIATION v. REED. [Cite as Columbus Bar Assn. v. Reed, 2000-Ohio-270.] … After respondent answered, a panel of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Supreme Court (“board”) found the above facts as stipulated to by the parties. {¶ 5} The panel concluded that respondent

State ex rel. Martines v. Cleveland City School Dist. Bd. of Edn.

1994 Ohio 118 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 27, 1994

Smith v. … But, cf., State v.

Bridges v. McMackin

44 Ohio St. 3d 135 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 26, 1989

Pressley, v. Indus. Comm. (1967), 11 Ohio St. 2d 141,149 , 40 O.O. 2d 141,146, 228 N.E. 2d 631, 639-640 . … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Picklo

96 Ohio St. 3d 195 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 21, 2002

CLEVELAND BAR ASSOCIATION v. PICKLO. [Cite as Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Picklo, 2002-Ohio-3995.] … Euclid v. Jemison (1986), 28 Ohio St.3d 157, 159, 28 OBR 250, 252, 503 N.E.2d 136, 138, quoting Fairview v. Giffee (1905), 73 Ohio St. 183, 187, 76 N.E. 865, 866.” State v.

State v. Preston

23 Ohio St. 3d 64 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 11, 1986

In State v. … Brown, Douglas and Wright, JJ., concur.

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Hartsock

94 Ohio St. 3d 18 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 19, 2001

Respondent answered, and the matter was submitted to a panel of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline (“board”) on stipulations and exhibits. … The board adopted the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the panel.

Elder v. Smith

103 Ohio St. (N.S.) 369 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 25, 1921

In 1906, in the case of Commissioners of Greene Co. v. … It is equally true here, as was said in the Harbine case in response to the citation of Haff v.

Hohman v. Wentsler

35 Ohio St. 3d 195 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 24, 1988

The judgment of the court of appeals (case No. 12527) is reversed on authority of Hardy v. VerMeulen (1987), 32 Ohio St. 3d 45 , 512 N.E. 2d 626 , and Hershberger v. … Brown, JJ., concur. Wright, J., dissents.

State v. Pearson

62 Ohio St. 2d 291 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 4, 1980

Brown, Sweeney, Locher and Holmes, JJ., concur. R. … See State v.

Farmers Banking Co. v. Hinkle

46 Ohio St. 2d 374 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 16, 1976

See Holmes v. Krepps (1972), 32 Ohio St. 2d 134 . … Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur. ^nder former procedure in Ohio, the bill of exceptions performed the same function as the transcript on appeal now performs. App.

State ex rel. Celebrezze v. Grogan Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.

62 Ohio St. 3d 1416 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 25, 1991

On motion to consolidate with 91-825, Charlie’s Dodge, Inc. v. Celebrezze, Lucas County, No. L-90-086. Motion denied. Wright, J., would grant and hold this cause for decision in 91-825. H. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., not participating.

DeRolph v. State

83 Ohio St. 3d 1208 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 21, 1998

Initially, it is important to identify the different constitutional authorities that distinguish the United States Supreme Court’s exercise of remedial power in Brown v. … Finally, Brown II and its progeny involved invidious discrimination based on race. Classifications based on race receive strict constitutional scrutiny. Adarand Constructors, Inc. v.

State Ex Rel. Bessick v. McCaffery

146 Ohio St. 21 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 7, 1945

required by the rules and bylaws of the board to entitle relators to benefits out of the police relief fund as might be provided under the law and the rules and regulations of the board. … Simmons, v. Wieber et al., Bd. of Trustees of Police Relief Fund, 145 Ohio St., 121 , 60 N. E. (2d), 687.

Lake County Bar Ass'n v. Ezzone

102 Ohio St. 3d 79 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 21, 2004

Moreover, respondent’s misconduct did not involve lies to a court or client, Dayton Bar Assn. v. … Disciplinary Counsel, v.

Huron Fish Co. v. Glander

146 Ohio St. 631 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 5, 1946

All contested items of this audit and the other audits before this board are items used in the catching of fish in the lake.” … In the ease of Moore et al., Tax Comm., v.

Slatmeyer v. Industrial Commission

115 Ohio St. 654 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 8, 1926

De Witt v. State ex rel. Crabbe, Atty. Gen., 108 Ohio St., 513 , 141 N. E., 551 . It is sought to invoke the case of Clemmer & Johnson Co. v. Indus. Comm., 112 Ohio St., 421 , 147 N. … Pittsburg Coal Co. v. Indus. Comm., and other cases, supra.