Case law

Disciplinary Counsel v. Medley

104 Ohio St. 3d 251 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 8, 2004

Disciplinary Counsel v. … Disciplinary Counsel v.

Ross v. Sam W. Emerson Co.

49 Ohio St. 3d 206 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 7, 1990

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on authority of Sedar v. Knowlton Constr. Co. (1990), 49 Ohio St. 3d 193 , 551 N.E. 2d 938 . Moyer, C.J., Holmes, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Columbus Bar Assn. v. Mangan

123 Ohio St. 3d 250 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 13, 2009

[Cite as Columbus Bar Assn. v. Mangan, 123 Ohio St.3d 250, 2009-Ohio-5287.] COLUMBUS BAR ASSOCIATION v. MANGAN. [Cite as Columbus Bar Assn. v. … The board adopted the panel’s findings of misconduct and recommendation. {¶ 3} The parties have not objected to the board report.

In re Application of Rodgers (Slip Opinion)

159 Ohio St. 3d 502 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 5, 2020

Bar Assn. v. … Columbus Bar Assn. v. Thompson, 69 Ohio St.2d 667, 669, 433 N.E.2d 602 (1982).

State ex rel. Buehler Food Markets, Inc. v. Industrial Commission

64 Ohio St. 2d 16 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 19, 1980

Haines, v. Indus. … Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes and Dowd, JJ., concur.

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Garrity

98 Ohio St. 3d 317 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 5, 2003

V(5)(A)(4) after receiving notice that he had been convicted of five felonies. … See Akron Bar Assn. v. Thomas (1999), 84 Ohio St.3d 395 , 704 N.E.2d 562 .

Flynn v. Fairview Village Retirement Community, Ltd.

132 Ohio St. 3d 199 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 14, 2012

Brown, 192 Ohio App.3d 670, 2011-Ohio-892, 950 N.E.2d 213 (5th Dist.), ¶ 6-10, reversed on other grounds, 132 Ohio St.3d 17, 2012-Ohio-1577, 967 N.E.2d 1212. … O’CONNOR, C.J., and LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, CUPP, and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., concur.

Office of Consumers' Counsel v. Public Utilities Commission

67 Ohio St. 2d 303 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 22, 1981

Ohio Edison Co. v. Pub. Util. Comm. (1981), 67 Ohio St. 2d 230 ; C & SOE v. Pub. Util. Comm. (1979), 58 Ohio St. 2d 120 ; Cleveland Elec. Illuminating Co. v. Pub. Util. … Illuminating Co. v. Pub. Util. Comm., supra. Accordingly, the order of the commission is affirmed. Order affirmed. Celebrezze, C. J., W. Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney, Holmes and C. Brown, JJ., concur.

Wilfong v. Batdorf

6 Ohio St. 3d 100 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 3, 1983

Similar advanced, progressive judicial thought has been expressed in Baker v. McKnight (1983), 4 Ohio St. 3d 125 , concurring opinion, Clifford F. Brown, J., at page 130; Blankenship v. … Brown, J., at page 618; Bonkowsky v. Bonkowsky (1982), 69 Ohio St. 2d 152 [ 23 O.O.3d 188 ], dissenting opinion, William B. Brown, J., at page 165; Shroades v.

State Ex Rel. Wilms v. Blake

144 Ohio St. 619 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 21, 1945

Greenward Realty Co., v. Zangerle, Aud., 135 Ohio St., 533 , 21 N. E. (2d), 662; State, ex rel. Christman, v. Skinner, Dir., 127 Ohio St., 55 , 186 N. E., 738 ; State, ex rel. Weaver, v. … Board of Trustees of Ohio State University, 126 Ohio St., 290 , 185 N. E., 196 ; State, ex rel. Coen, v. Industrial Commission, 126 Ohio St., 550 , 186 N. E., 398 ; Board of Education of Sycamore v.

Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Ewing

75 Ohio St. 3d 244 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 6, 1996

V(4)(D)(3); however, no grievance can be dismissed under the rule without proof that respondent was denied his rights to a fair hearing. … Having adopted the board’s findings of misconduct and overruled respondent’s objections, we turn to relator’s objection to the sanction recommended by the board.

Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Berk

114 Ohio St. 3d 478 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 29, 2007

See, e.g., Columbus Bar Assn. v. … V(9). During the probation, respondent shall (1) allow the monitor appointed by relator pursuant to Gov.Bar R.

Costanzo v. Gaul

62 Ohio St. 2d 106 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 30, 1980

See Mills v. Denny (1954), 245 Iowa 584 , 63 N.W. 2d 222 ; McClendon v. Cloverdale (Super. Ct. 1964), 57 Del. 568 , 203 A. 2d 815 . … Brown, Sweeney and Locher, JJ., concur. W. Brown, J., concurs in the judgment.

Dayton Women's Health Center v. Enix

52 Ohio St. 3d 67 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 20, 1990

Similarly, in Roemisch v. Mutual of Omaha Ins. … Brown, JJ., concur. H. Brown, J., concurs separately. Sweeney, Douglas and Res-nick, JJ., dissent.

Olentangy Local Schools Bd. of Edn. v. Delaware Cty. Bd. of Revision (Slip Opinion)

2017 Ohio 8347 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 31, 2017

SLIP OPINION NO. 2017-OHIO-8347 OLENTANGY L OCAL SCHOOLS BOARD OF EDUCATION, APPELLEE, v. DELAWARE COUNTY BOARD OF REVISION ET AL., APPELLEES; 7991 COLUMBUS PIKE, L.L.C., APPELLANT. … Bd. of Edn. v. Summit Cty.

State ex rel. Maxcy v. Lucas Cty. Bd. of Elections

2018 Ohio 4419 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 1, 2018

Maxcy v. … Moreover, this court has recognized an exception to the mootness doctrine when there " 'remains a debatable constitutional question to resolve.' " Smith v.

State Ex Rel. Newdick v. O'Leary

149 Ohio St. 440 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 28, 1948

McGinley, v. Bliss et al., Board of Elections, ante, 329, 78 N. … McGinley, v. Bliss, supra. The judgment of the Court of Appeals in the present case is reversed and final judgment entered for the appellant relator. Judgment reversed. Weygandt, C.

Morris v. City Council

71 Ohio St. 3d 52 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 13, 1994

A city council’s authority to determine if all applicable statutory requirements have been met is therefore more restricted than that of a board of elections. See State ex rel. Watkins v. … State ex rel. v. Lemon (C.P.1925), 26 Ohio N.P.

State v. Vanderhorst

2012 Ohio 5759 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 7, 2012

[Cite as State v. Vanderhorst, 134 Ohio St.3d 592, 2012-Ohio-5759.] THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. VANDERHORST, APPELLEE. [Cite as State v. Vanderhorst, 134 Ohio St.3d 592, 2012-Ohio-5759.] … O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, LANZINGER, CUPP, and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., concur. O’DONNELL, J., dissents. __________________ William D.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Ault

110 Ohio St. 3d 207 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 30, 2006

Disciplinary Counsel v. Golden, 97 Ohio St.3d 230 , 2002-Ohio-5934 , 778 N.E.2d 564, ¶ 24 . Thus, in Disciplinary Counsel v. … Also comparable is Disciplinary Counsel v.