Case law

State v. Mentser

130 Ohio St. 3d 262 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 26, 2011

{¶ 1} The cause is remanded to the court of appeals for application of State v. Williams, 129 Ohio St.3d 344 , 2011-Ohio-3374 , 952 N.E.2d 1108 . … O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur. O’Donnell, J., dissents.

State ex rel. Rouault v. Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court

50 Ohio St. 2d 65 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 4, 1977

Northern Ohio Telephone Co., v. Winter (1970), 23 Ohio St. 2d 6, 8 . … Brown, Sweeney and Lochee, JJ., concur.

State v. Rucker

135 Ohio St. 3d 218 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 6, 2012

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed in part and reversed in part on the authority of State v. Moore, 135 Ohio St.3d 151 , 2012-Ohio-5479 , 985 N.E.2d 432 . … O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur.

Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Cox

98 Ohio St. 3d 420 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 9, 2003

A panel of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Supreme Court (“board”) heard the matter on the parties’ pleadings, testimony, and exhibits. … The board further recommended that the costs of the proceeding be taxed to respondent. {¶ 8} We adopt the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the board.

Ottawa Cty. Bd. Commrs. v. Marblehead

86 Ohio St. 3d 43 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 7, 1999

BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF OTTAWA COUNTY, APPELLANT, v. VILLAGE OF MARBLEHEAD ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as Ottawa Cty. Bd. Commrs. v. Marblehead, 1999-Ohio-80.] … See, e.g., Columbus v. Teater (1978), 53 Ohio St.2d 253, 260-261, 7 O.O.3d 410, 414, 374 N.E.2d 154, 159; Canton v.

Ohio State Bar Assn. v. Reid

85 Ohio St. 3d 327 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 7, 1999

OHIO STATE BAR ASSOCIATION v. REID. [Cite as Ohio State Bar Assn. v. Reid, 1999-Ohio-374.] … Cross v.

Phillips v. Burt

77 Ohio St. 3d 1229 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 22, 1997

The “alerting event” rationale of Browning v. Burt (1993), 66 Ohio St.3d 544 , 613 N.E.2d 993 , is a departure from prior law. … I would reverse this case and overrule Browning. Moyer, C.J., and Stratton, J., concur in the foregoing dissenting opinion.

State v. Graham

136 Ohio St. 3d 125 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 29, 2013

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Brown County, Nos. … Minnesota v.

State ex rel. Maxwell v. Schneider

103 Ohio St. (N.S.) 492 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 22, 1921

of a board of education for the newly-created school district, who have qualified and organized such board. … Attorney General, v. Ironton Gas Co., 37 Ohio St., 45; Brannon v. Board of Education of Tiro Consolidated School District, 99 Ohio St., 369, and County Board of Education of Hancock Co. v. Boehm, 102 Ohio St., 292 .

Orange City School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision

74 Ohio St. 3d 415 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 7, 1996

BOARD OF EDUCATION FOR ORANGE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT, APPELLEE, v. CUYAHOGA COUNTY BOARD OF REVISION, APPELLEE; SHERWIN-WILLIAMS COMPANY, APPELLANT. [Cite as Orange City School Dist. … Witt Co. v. Hamilton Cty. Bd. of Revision (1991), 61 Ohio St. 3d 155, 573 N.E.2d 661. Unless the BTA abuses this discretion, we will affirm its decision. Webb Corp. v. Lucas Cty.

State ex rel. Robinson v. Crawford Cty. Bd. of Elections

2023 Ohio 3378 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 21, 2023

ROBINSON v. CRAWFORD COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS. [Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as State ex rel. Robinson v. Crawford Cty. … Grumbles v. Delaware Cty.

Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Ginther

108 Ohio St. 3d 48 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 25, 2006

See Columbus Bar Assn. v. … V(4)(G), as found by the board. We further agree that an indefinite suspension is appropriate based on the board’s reservations and reasoning. Bruce A. Campbell, Bar Counsel, and Jill M.

In re Lewis

178 Ohio St. 3d 1271 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 21, 2025

V(18)(A)(3), the director of the Board of Professional Conduct of the Supreme Court of Ohio submitted to this court a certified copy of a determination of default of a child- support order by respondent, Matthew Merritt Lewis … V(23)(A)(1) and from receiving, disbursing, or otherwise handling any client trust funds or property. {¶ 8} It is further ordered that respondent shall not be reinstated to the practice of law until (1) the Board

State ex rel. Chatfield v. Flautt

131 Ohio St. 3d 383 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 28, 2012

Chatfield v. Flautt, 131 Ohio St.3d 383, 2012-Ohio-1294.] THE STATE EX REL. CHATFIELD, APPELLANT, v. FLAUTT, PROS. ATTY., APPELLEE. [Cite as State ex rel. Chatfield v. … Barb v. Cuyahoga Cty. Jury Commr., 124 Ohio St.3d 238, 2010-Ohio-120, 921 N.E.2d 236.

In re Application of Richmond

169 Ohio St. 3d 362 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 13, 2022

. {¶ 3} After a three-member panel of the board conducted a hearing, the board issued a report recommending that Richmond’s applications be disapproved and that she be permitted to reapply to register as a candidate … Schmidt Law, L.L.C., and Katarina V.

State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.

131 Ohio St. 375 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1936

In the case of DeWitt v. State, ex rel. Crabbe, Atty. … the injury or death resulted because of such failure, the board was authorized to make an additional award.

Koler v. St. Joseph Hospital

69 Ohio St. 2d 477 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 26, 1982

In Klema v. St. … Brown, Locher and C. Brown, JJ., concur. Sweeney, Holmes and Krupansky, JJ., dissent. Am. Sub. H. B. No. 332, 1981 Session Laws, amends R.

Doe v. Archdiocese of Cincinnati

109 Ohio St. 3d 491 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 31, 2006

In Browning v. … In Norgard v.

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Medley

93 Ohio St. 3d 474 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 24, 2001

Respondent answered, and the matter was considered by a panel of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Supreme Court (“board”) on February 22, 2001. … Disciplinary Counsel v. Evans (2000), 89 Ohio St.3d 497, 501 , 733 N.E.2d 609, 613 .

Akron Bar Ass'n v. Goodlet

99 Ohio St. 3d 355 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 6, 2003

V(4)(G) for failing to cooperate with relator’s investigation. … We further find that the sanction recommended by the parties, the panel, and the board, a one-year suspension that is stayed on conditions, is appropriate. See, e.g., Darke Cty. Bar Assn. v.