Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.31s
137 Ohio St. 602 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 13, 1941
action was taken by said board: “Howard C. … Mowrer, v. Underwood et al., Akron Civil Service Commission, 137 Ohio St., 1 , 27 N.
Cited 1 timesPublished99 Ohio St. 3d 166 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 25, 2003
Waldick v. … Lipovsky v.
Cited 27 timesPublishedState ex rel. Thomas v. DeWine
127 Ohio St. 3d 214 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 19, 2010
Thomas v. DeWine, 127 Ohio St.3d 214, 2010-Ohio-4984.] THE STATE EX REL. THOMAS, APPELLANT, v. DEWINE, JUDGE, APPELLEE. [Cite as State ex rel. Thomas v. DeWine, 127 Ohio St.3d 214, 2010-Ohio-4984.] … BROWN, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL, and CUPP, JJ., concur.
Cited 6 timesPublishedDayton Power & Light Co. v. Public Utilities Commission
61 Ohio St. 2d 215 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 13, 1980
See, e.g., Masury Water Co. v. Pub. Util. Comm. (1979), 58 Ohio St. 2d 147 ; C & SOE v. Pub. Util. Comm. (1979), 58 Ohio St. 2d 120 ; and Franklin Co. Welfare Rights Org. v. Pub. Util. Comm. (1978), 55 Ohio St. 2d 1 . … Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney, Locher and Holmes, JJ., concur, As stated most recently in the syllabus of C & SOE v. Pub. Util.
Cited 6 timesPublished9 Ohio St. 3d 8 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 4, 1984
In Sizemore v. … Brown and J. P. Celebrezze, JJ., concur.
Cited 15 timesPublishedMiami County Bar Ass'n v. Wyandt & Silvers, Inc.
107 Ohio St. 3d 259 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 21, 2005
Bar Assn. v. Wyandt & Silvers, Inc., 107 Ohio St.3d 259, 2005-Ohio-6430.] MIAMI COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION v. WYANDT & SILVERS, INC. ET AL. [Cite as Miami Cty. Bar Assn. v. … In Columbus Bar Assn. v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedState ex rel. Dallman v. Court of Common Pleas
35 Ohio St. 2d 176 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 11, 1973
Dallman, v. … Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur. R.
Cited 170 timesPublishedTrebmal Landerhaven v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision
72 Ohio St. 3d 31 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 12, 1995
TREBMAL LANDERHAVEN, APPELLANT AND CROSS-APPELLEE, v. CUYAHOGA COUNTY BOARD OF REVISION ET AL., APPELLEES; MAYFIELD HEIGHTS BOARD OF EDUCATION, APPELLEE AND CROSS-APPELLANT. … (Bd. of Revision v.
Cited 1 timesPublished81 Ohio St. 3d 291 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 25, 1998
We agree with the board. More disturbing to us, as it was to the board, was respondent’s attempt to validate Meredith’s will six years after its execution. … As we said in Disciplinary Counsel v.
Cited 14 timesPublished119 Ohio St. 3d 254 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 5, 2008
Unlike in the present case, the Board of Tax Appeals in Quotron found that Quotron’s service was “clearly antithetical” to services that involve interpretation or analysis of data. Quotron Systems, Inc. v. … . {¶ 16} In analyzing the service provided in this case, we have determined that the Board of Tax Appeals’ decision that is most directly on point is PNC Bank, Ohio, N.A. v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedState ex rel. Eaton Corp. v. Lancaster
44 Ohio St. 3d 106 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 12, 1989
Peabody Coal Co., v. Indus. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.
Cited 11 timesPublishedCleveland Bar Ass'n v. Para-Legals, Inc.
106 Ohio St. 3d 455 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 2, 2005
Id.; Cleveland Bar Assn. v. … Columbus Bar Assn. v. Purnell (2002), 94 Ohio St.3d 126 , 760 N.E.2d 817 ; Coats, 98 Ohio St.3d 413 , 2003-Ohio-1496 , 786 N.E.2d 449 . {¶ 9} The board considered the factors listed in Gov.Bar R.
Cited 4 timesPublished133 Ohio St. 3d 162 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 27, 2012
{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of State v. Gunnell, 132 Ohio St.3d 442 , 2012-Ohio-3236 , 973 N.E.2d 243 . O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lanzinger, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur. … Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, and Cupp, JJ., dissent for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion in State v. Gunnell, 132 Ohio St.3d 442 , 2012-Ohio-3236 , 973 N.E.2d 243 .
Cited 1 timesPublishedTrumbull County Bar Association v. Bodor
143 Ohio St. 3d 505 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 9, 2015
V(13)(C)(1) through (5). … The board agreed and, in support of the recommendation, cited Lake Cty. Bar Assn. v. Kubyn, 121 Ohio St.3d 321, 2009-Ohio-1154, 903 N.E.2d 1215.
Cited 0 timesPublished14 Ohio St. 2d 54 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 17, 1968
See Miner v. Witt, 82 Ohio St. 237 , and Webster v. Serrott, 7 Ohio App. 2d 67 . At the time this annexation ordinance was adopted there was no injunction, temporary or otherwise, in effect to prevent such annexation. … Croll v. Franklin, 36 Ohio St. 316 ; Section 2727.05, Revised Code. Judgment reversed. Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, 0’Neill, Herbert and Brown, JJ., concur.
Cited 3 timesPublished54 Ohio St. 2d 227 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 10, 1978
Union Properties v. Cleveland Trust Co. (1949), 152 Ohio St. 430 , 89 N. E. 2d 638 ; Fecteau v. Cleveland Trust Co. (1960), 171 Ohio St. 121 , 167 N. E. 2d 890 . * * *” Steinhauser v. Repko, supra, at page 268. … Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney and Locher, JJ., concur. Ceeebrezze, J., concurs in paragraphs one, two, three and four of the syllabus and in the judgment.
Cited 35 timesPublished119 Ohio St. 3d 217 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 13, 2008
Bar Assn. v. … Bar Assn. v. Akers, 106 Ohio St.3d 337 , 2005-Ohio-5144 , 835 N.E.2d 29 (imposing an 18-month sentence with 12 months stayed for failure to supervise an employee); and Mahoning Cty. Bar Assn. v.
Cited 3 timesPublished56 Ohio St. 2d 75 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 8, 1978
On February 7,1978, relator, Dayton Bar Association, filed a complaint and certificate with the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline, pursuant to Gov. E. V, wherein relator charged respondent, Gerald E. … Based upon its findings and the prior case authority óf this court, the board recommended that respondent be suspended indefinitely from the practice of law. Beginning with the ease of Cleveland Bar Assn. v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedEnghauser Manufacturing Co. v. Eriksson Engineering Ltd.
6 Ohio St. 3d 31 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 20, 1983
Brown, dissenting). Accord Muskopf v. Corning Hospital Dist. (1961), 55 Cal. 2d 211, 218 , 359 P. 2d 457 . Inasmuch as it is a judicially created doctrine, it may be judicially abolished. (See Sears v. … Brown and J. P. Celebrezze, JJ., concur. *37 Locher and Holmes, JJ., dissent.
Superseded by statute, as recognized in Sawicki v. Village of Ottawa HillsCited 114 timesPublished42 Ohio St. 2d 39 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 2, 1975
Argersinger v. Hamlin (1972), 407 U. S. 25, 37 ; Gideon v. Wainwright (1963), 372 U. S. 335 . The obligation to provide counsel is often said to run to the “indigent.” … Brown, JJ., concur.
Cited 62 timesPublished
Ask Donna