Opinion

State v. McAlmont

133 Ohio St. 3d 162
976 N.E.2d 898

Court: Ohio Supreme Court
Filed: Sep 27, 2012
Status: Published
On the bench: Brown, Connor, Cupp, Donnell, Gunnell, Lanzinger, Ohio, Pfeifer, Stated, Stratton
Cited by: 1 cases
Authority: More cited than 58.3%

The opinion

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of State v. Gunnell, 132 Ohio St.3d 442 , 2012-Ohio-3236 , 973 N.E.2d 243 .

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lanzinger, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur.

D. Andrew Wilson, Clark County Prosecuting Attorney, and Andrew Picek, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant.

Murr, Compton, Claypool & Macbeth and Charles M. Blue, for appellee.

Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, and Cupp, JJ., dissent for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion in State v. Gunnell, 132 Ohio St.3d 442 , 2012-Ohio-3236 , 973 N.E.2d 243 .

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.