Case law

State v. Riggenbach

128 Ohio St. 3d 338 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 29, 2010

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of State v. Fischer, 128 Ohio St.3d 92 , 2010-Ohio-6238 , 942 N.E.2d 332 . … Brown, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, and Cupp, JJ., concur. Lanzinger, J., dissents.

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Shramek

98 Ohio St. 3d 441 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 16, 2003

V(4)(G). See, e.g., Disciplinary Counsel v. Connors, 97 Ohio St.3d 479 , 2002-Ohio-6722 , 780 N.E.2d 567, ¶ 17 . … Cf., e.g., Columbus Bar Assn. v.

State ex rel. Buswell v. Indus. Comm.

82 Ohio St. 3d 102 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 10, 1998

Noll v. Indus. … Montgomery, Attorney General and Yolanda V.

Thirty-Four Corp. v. Sixty-Seven Corp.

15 Ohio St. 3d 350 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 31, 1984

Accord Kinney v. Mathias (1984), 10 Ohio St. 3d 72 ; Connin v. Bailey (1984), 15 Ohio St. 3d 34 . See, also, Russell v. Fourth National Bank (1921), 102 Ohio St. 248 . … Brown and J.P. Celebrezze, JJ., concur. Holmes, J., concurs in part and dissents in part. Locher and C. Brown, JJ., dissent.

State v. Jones

9 Ohio St. 3d 123 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 1, 1984

(Kraner v. Coastal Tank Lines [1971], 26 Ohio St. 2d 59 [ 55 O.O.2d 68 ], approved and followed.)” … Brown, Sweeney, Locher, C. Brown and J. P. Celebrezze, JJ., concur. Holmes, J., dissents.

State Ex Rel. Hinchliffe v. Gibbons

116 Ohio St. 390 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 22, 1927

The board of elections is not in any sense a municipal functionary. It is strictly a board and an arm of the state government. … This controversy is in all essential respects *396 similar to Switzer v. State ex rel. Silvey, 103 Ohio St., 306 , 133 N. E., 552 .

State v. Troiano

130 Ohio St. 3d 316 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 13, 2011

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed and the cause is remanded for application of State v. Barker, 129 Ohio St.3d 472 , 2011-Ohio-4130 , 953 N.E.2d 826 . … O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Ridenbaugh

122 Ohio St. 3d 583 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 20, 2009

[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Ridenbaugh, 122 Ohio St.3d 583, 2009-Ohio-4091.] DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. RIDENBAUGH. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. … Disciplinary Counsel v.

Akron Bar Ass'n v. Maher

110 Ohio St. 3d 346 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 20, 2006

Like the panel, the board recommended a public reprimand, presenting this explanation for the panel’s recommendation: {¶ 15} “We find this case almost identical to that of Medina County Bar Association v. … V(4)(G). Such violations are not present in this case. James S. Thomasson and John Weisensell, for relator.

U.S. Bank National Ass'n v. Perry

134 Ohio St. 3d 328 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 5, 2012

Corp. v. Schwartzwald, 134 Ohio St.3d 13 , 2012-Ohio-5017 , 979 N.E.2d 1214 . O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur.

Gardner Plumbing, Inc. v. Cottrill

44 Ohio St. 2d 111 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 10, 1975

Co. v. McMillen (1873), 24 Ohio St. 67 ; Troietto v. G. H. Hammond Co. (C. A. 6, 1940), 110 F. 2d 135 ; Greep v. Bruns (1945), 160 Kan. 48 , 159 P. 2d 803 ; Judson v. … Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur. Corrigan and Celebrezze, JJ., dissent. Mr. Cottrill testified that prior to the execution of the mortgage, he was assured by Mr.

Lovell v. Levin

114 Ohio St. 3d 1418 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 12, 2007

It is ordered by the court, sua sponte, that this ease shall be consolidated with 2007-0580, Caldwell v. Levin, Board of Tax Appeals, No. 2006-H-548, 2007-0584, Vestfall v. … Levin, Board of Tax Appeals, *1419 No. 2006-T-1054, 2007-0586, Huelsman v. Levin, Board of Tax Appeals, No. 2006-R-549, and 2007-0589, Lovell v. Levin, Board of Tax Appeals, No. 2006-A-781, for oral argument.

State v. Diehl

64 Ohio St. 2d 179 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 23, 1980

State v. Pearson, supra. As there is no evidence in the record which corroborates McGhee’s testimony, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed. Judgment affirmed. Celebrezze, C. J., W. Brown, P. … Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes and Dowd, JJ., concur. Before R. C. 2923.03 (D) was enacted, a conviction could be based solely upon the uncorroborated testimony of an accomplice. State v.

State ex rel. Durek v. Masheter

9 Ohio St. 2d 76 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 8, 1967

Central Service Station, Inc., v. Masheter, Dir. of Hwys., 7 Ohio St. 2d 1 , 218 N. E. 2d 177 , and State, ex rel. Sibarco Corp., v. City of Berea, 7 Ohio St. 2d 85 , 218 N. … J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O ’Neill, Schneider and Brown, JJ., concur.

Pembaur v. Leis

1 Ohio St. 3d 89 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 21, 1982

Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown and Krupansky, JJ., concur. We are mindful of our decision in Curtis v. … See, also, Theilmann v. Rutland Hospital, Inc. (C.A. 2, 1972), 455 F. 2d 853, 855 ; Marshall v. Sielaff (C.A. 3, 1974), 492 F. 2d 917, 918 .

Disciplinary Counsel v. Ferfolia

170 Ohio St. 3d 468 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 30, 2022

V(13), and the sanctions imposed in similar cases. {¶ 19} The parties stipulated and the board found that three aggravating factors are present—Ferfolia had a dishonest or selfish motive, committed multiple offenses … See Disciplinary Counsel v.

Plumbers & Steamfitters Local Union 83 v. Union Local School Dist. Bd. of Edn.

86 Ohio St. 3d 318 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 8, 1999

PLUMBERS & STEAMFITTERS LOCAL UNION 83, APPELLANT, v. UNION LOCAL SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION, APPELLEE. [Cite as Plumbers & Steamfitters Local Union 83 v. … Bush v.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Hale

137 Ohio St. 3d 1406 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 15, 2013

The board recommended that the agreement be accepted. … V(8)(D), this cause is remanded to the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline for further proceedings, including consideration of a more severe sanction.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Simmons

120 Ohio St. 3d 304 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 3, 2008

The panel accepted the agreement and its statement of facts and made a recommendation, which the board adopted. {¶ 2} The board recommends that we impose a one-year suspension with six months stayed. … Disciplinary Counsel v. Fowerbaugh (1995), 74 Ohio St.3d 187, 190 , 658 N.E.2d 237 .

Disciplinary Counsel v. Ames

147 Ohio St. 3d 363 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 22, 2016

V(13)(C)(1), (4), and (6). … V(16), and it recommends that we adopt the agreement in its entirety, noting that Ames’s misconduct was his only ethical misstep in more than 45 years of practice. {¶ 7} We agree with the board that Ames engaged in