Case law

Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Ass'n v. Polke

135 Ohio St. 3d 121 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 12, 2012

V(7)(F). … Disciplinary Counsel v.

In re Becker

39 Ohio St. 2d 84 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 10, 1974

This court finds the rationale of People v. Jiles (1969), 43 Ill. 2d 145, 150 , 251 N. … Brown, JJ., concur. O’Neill, C. J., Stern and W. Brown, JJ., dissent.

City of Niles v. Howard

12 Ohio St. 3d 162 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 25, 1984

In Toledo v. … Brown and J. P. Celebrezze, JJ., concur. Sweeney, J., dissents. O’Neill, J., of the Seventh Appellate District, sitting for W. Brown, J. “513.03 DRUG ABUSE: CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE POSSESSION OR USE.

State v. Solomon

66 Ohio St. 2d 214 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 20, 1981

In State v. … Brown, Potter, Whiteside and Locher, JJ., concur. Holmes and C. Brown, JJ., concur, in part and dissent in part. Potter, J., of the Sixth Appellate District, sitting for P. Brown, J.

Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Blankemeyer

109 Ohio St. 3d 156 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 10, 2006

V(11)(B). … See, e.g., Disciplinary Counsel v.

State v. Lovejoy

79 Ohio St. 3d 440 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 24, 1997

(Browning v. State [1929], 120 Ohio St. 62, 165 N.E. 566; State v. … Brown v.

Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Newman

124 Ohio St. 3d 505 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 17, 2010

[Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Newman, 124 Ohio St.3d 505, 2010-Ohio-928.] CINCINNATI BAR ASSOCIATION v. NEWMAN. [Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. … V(6)(F).

Disciplinary Counsel v. Andrews

165 Ohio St. 3d 1276 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 8, 2021

Discipline Board—Gov.Bar R. … V(20). {¶ 2} On September 29, 2021, relator, disciplinary counsel, filed with this court a certified copy of an amended order of the State of Michigan Attorney Discipline Board entered September 10, 2021, in In re

Disciplinary Counsel v. DeGidio

135 Ohio St. 3d 407 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 18, 2013

Disciplinary Counsel v. … v.

Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Association v. Lemieux

139 Ohio St. 3d 320 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 27, 2014

V(6)(G), which permits a unanimous panel of the board to order the dismissal of a count without referring it to the board or this court for review, requires the panel to provide notice to counsel of record and other interested … Instead, the panel certified its findings of fact and recommendations to the board in accordance with Gov.Bar R. V(6)(H) and (I). Because the board did not order dismissal and provide the notices required by Gov.Bar R.

Stark County Bar Ass'n v. Bennafield

107 Ohio St. 3d 29 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 16, 2005

Co. v. J.C. Penney Co., Inc. (1986), 27 Ohio St.3d 31, 34 , 27 OBR 447, 501 N.E.2d 617 . And with few exceptions, including Cleveland Bar Assn. v. … Bar Assn. v. Clapp (1998), 84 Ohio St.3d 276, 278 , 703 N.E.2d 771 .

Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Greenberg

112 Ohio St. 3d 138 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 27, 2006

These violations and an absence of significant mitigating circumstances, as the board observed, have warranted a lawyer’s permanent disbarment. Disciplinary Counsel v. … Akron Bar Assn. v.

State Ex Rel. Fisher v. Sherman

135 Ohio St. 458 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 31, 1939

Nays: None.’ ” It will be noted that the board of county commissioners did not authorize the board of elections to rent the machines. … Steele v. State, 159 Ala., 9 , 48 So., 673 ; Ducker v. Latonia Deposit Bank, 242 Ky., 374 , 46 S. W. (2d), 493 ; Drovers’ Deposit National Bank v. Tichenor, 156 Wis., 251 , 145 N. W., 777 .

Dayton Bar Assn. v. Daly

2025 Ohio 1624 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 8, 2025

See Kala v. … Nix v.

Anderson v. Maxwell

10 Ohio St. 2d 188 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 3, 1967

The petitioners are remanded to custody on the authority of Freeman v. Maxwell, Warden, 4 Ohio St. 2d 4 . Petitioners remanded to custody. Taet, C. … J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Herbert, Schneider and Brown, JJ., concur.

Dayton Bar Ass'n v. Shaman

80 Ohio St. 3d 196 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 5, 1997

However, we do not agree with the board’s recommendation that respondent be permanently disbarred from the practice of law. In Cleveland Bar Assn. v. … Also, compare, Disciplinary Counsel v.

Rigby v. Lake County

58 Ohio St. 3d 269 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 10, 1991

See Crosby v. Hill (1883), 39 Ohio St. 100 , 105; Crowell v. Western Reserve Bank (1854), 3 Ohio St. 406 , paragraph one of the syllabus; Cowan v. Ladd (1853), 2 Ohio St. 322 , paragraph one of the syllabus; Ralston v. … Stout (1965), 1 Ohio App. 2d 491, 494 , 30 O.O. 2d 508, 510, 205 N.E. 2d 405, 408 ; and Nickey v. Brown (1982), 7 Ohio App. 3d 32, 35-36 , 7 OBR 34, 38-39, 454 N.E. 2d 177, 182 .

Toledo Bar Assn. v. Kramer

89 Ohio St. 3d 321 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 12, 2000

TOLEDO BAR ASSOCIATION v. KRAMER. [Cite as Toledo Bar Assn. v. Kramer, 2000-Ohio-163.] … Therefore, we agree with the board’s recommendation.

Ohio State Bar Ass'n v. McCray

109 Ohio St. 3d 43 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 26, 2006

See, e.g., Disciplinary Counsel v. … Bar Assn. v.

Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Diehl

105 Ohio St. 3d 469 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 22, 2005

V(9). {¶ 10} Upon review, we agree that respondent violated DR 1-102(A)(4), 1-104(A), 3-101(B), and 7-101(A)(3) as found by the board. … V(9). If respondent violates the conditions of the stay, the stay shall be lifted, and respondent shall serve the entire two-year suspension. Costs are taxed to respondent. Richard H. Johnson and Ernest F.