Opinion

Anderson v. Maxwell

10 Ohio St. 2d 188
39 Ohio Op. 2d 196
226 N.E.2d 103
1967 Ohio LEXIS 390

Court: Ohio Supreme Court
Filed: May 3, 1967
Status: Published
On the bench: Brown, Herbert, Matthias, Neill, Schneider, Taet, Zimmerman
Cited by: 6 cases
Authority: More cited than 97.3%

The opinion

Per Curiam.

In each of these actions in habeas corpus, the petitioner is being held pursuant to a judgment of conviction of a court of record which had jurisdiction to render the judgment. In each of these cases, the petitioner has sought and been denied relief under the postconviction statutes, and is seeking the same relief in habeas corpus.

The petitioners are remanded to custody on the authority of Freeman v. Maxwell, Warden, 4 Ohio St. 2d 4 .

Petitioners remanded to custody.

Taet, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Herbert, Schneider and Brown, JJ., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.