Case law

Ohio State Bar Assn. v. Pro-Net Fin., Inc. (Slip Opinion)

168 Ohio St. 3d 115 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 15, 2022

Montgomery v. R & D Chem. Co., 72 Ohio St.3d 202, 204, 648 N.E.2d 821 (1995), quoting DeHart v. Aetna Life Ins. … Finkbeiner v. Lucas Cty.

State ex rel. Basham v. Consolidation Coal Co.

43 Ohio St. 3d 151 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 7, 1989

Stephenson, v. Indus. … Brown’s report. Under State, ex rel. Mitchell, v.

Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Kenney

110 Ohio St. 3d 38 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 19, 2006

Moreover, as the board found, the recommended sanction is appropriate given the gravity of respondent’s misconduct, the aggravating factors, and the mitigation evidence. See Disciplinary Counsel v. … V(9) on the same conditions for a period of two years.

Roseborough v. N.L. Industries

10 Ohio St. 3d 142 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 25, 1984

In Bryant v. … Brown, Sweeney and J. P. Celebrezze, JJ., concur. C. Brown, J., concurs in part. Holmes, J., dissents.

Civil Service Personnel Ass'n v. City of Akron

48 Ohio St. 2d 25 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 27, 1976

See Dayton Teachers Assn. v. Dayton Bd. of Edn. (1975), 41 Ohio St. 2d 127 , 323 N. E. 2d 714 . … Brown, JJ;, concur. Ceeebrezze and P. Brown, JJ., dissent. An exception to the strict application of the maxim; has been declared where the rule of law would operate to sanction fraud or injustice in a particular case.

State Ex Rel. Reardon v. McDonald

124 Ohio St. 315 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 28, 1931

The board of elections of Franklin county duly appointed the relator as an assistant clerk of the board. … Board of Commissioners of Butler County, 95 Ohio St., 157 , 115 N. E., 919 . The controlling principle is very clearly and concisely stated in the case of State, ex rel. Attorney General, v.

State Ex Rel. Nation Building Technical Academy v. Ohio Department of Education

123 Ohio St. 3d 35 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 19, 2009

Couch v. Trimble Local School Dist. … Bartchy v.

State ex rel. Elmore v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Elections

2025 Ohio 2585 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 23, 2025

ELMORE ET AL. v. FRANKLIN COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS ET AL. [Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as State ex rel. Elmore v. … Nasal v. Miami Cty. Bd. of Elections, 2021-Ohio-2993, ¶ 10, and State ex rel. Emhoff v. Medina Cty.

State v. Evans

32 Ohio St. 2d 185 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1972

The first paragraph of the syllabus of State v. … J.., Corrigan, Stern and Brown, JJ., concur in case No. 72-33. Schneider, Herbert and Leach, JJ., dissent in case No. 72-33. Schneider, Herbert, Corrigan, Stern, Leach and Brown, JJ., concur in case No. 72-163.

McNary v. State

128 Ohio St. 497 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 20, 1934

The case of Gale v. … The latest case bearing on the question before us is United States v. Brown , 6 Fed. Supp., 331, decided December 16, 1933.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Terbeek

135 Ohio St. 3d 458 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 16, 2013

Bar Assn. v. … Bar Assn. v.

Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Larson

124 Ohio St. 3d 249 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 30, 2009

In Disciplinary Counsel v. … See, e.g., Disciplinary Counsel v.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Champion

147 Ohio St. 3d 425 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 8, 2016

V(13)(A). {¶ 8} The parties stipulated and the board found that Champion’s dishonest motive was an aggravating factor weighing in favor of a harsher sanction. See Gov.Bar R. V(13)(B)(2). … Bar Assn. v.

Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. Jurczenko

106 Ohio St. 3d 123 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 24, 2005

V(4)(G). … V(4)(G), as found by the board.

Minnich v. Ashland Oil Co.

15 Ohio St. 3d 396 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 31, 1984

The Gedra rule was explained in Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. … Brown, JJ., concur. W. Brown, Locher and Holmes, JJ., dissent.

Grava v. Parkman Twp.

73 Ohio St. 3d 379 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 30, 1995

GRAVA, APPELLANT, v. PARKMAN TOWNSHIP [BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS], APPELLEE. [Cite as Grava v. Parkman Twp., 1995-Ohio-331.] … Amusements, Inc. v.

Keaton v. Ribbeck

58 Ohio St. 2d 443 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 20, 1979

See, e. g., Grindell v. Huber (1971), 28 Ohio St. 2d 71 ; Whitehead v. Genl. Tel. Co. (1969), 20 Ohio St. 2d 108 . … Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney, Locher and Holmes, JJ., concur. The relevant portion of R.

Hendrix v. Eighth & Walnut Corp.

1 Ohio St. 3d 205 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 11, 1982

See, e.g., Pitts v. Housing Authority (1953), 160 Ohio St. 129 [ 51 O.O. 51 ]; Brown v. Baseball Co. (1952), 158 Ohio St. 1 [ 47 O.O. 478 ]. … Brown and C. Brown, JJ., concur in part and dissent in part.

Kunz v. Buckeye Union Ins.

1 Ohio St. 3d 79 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 21, 1982

Appellees find support in Squire v. … Brown, Sweeney, Holmes and C. Brown, JJ., concur. Locher and Krupansky, JJ., dissent.

Layne v. Ohio Adult Parole Authority

97 Ohio St. 3d 456 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 18, 2002

I Layne v. … Ill Lee v.