Case law

Bond v. Airway Development Corp.

54 Ohio St. 2d 363 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 21, 1978

In Kauder v. Kauder (1974), 38 Ohio St. 2d 265 , we held, in a per curiam opinion: “In addition to establishing the 30 day period for appeal, App. … Brown, Cole and Locher, JJ., concur. Cole, J., of the Third Appellate District, sitting for P. Brown, J. ' Cook, J., of the Eleventh Appellate District, sitting: for Sweeney, J.

Toledo Coalition for Safe Energy v. Public Utilities Commission

69 Ohio St. 2d 559 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 3, 1982

See, also, Pierson v. United States (D. Del. 1976), 71 F.R.D. 75 ; United States v. IBM (S.D. N.Y. 1974), 62 F.R.D. 530 , certorari denied, 416 U. S. 995 ; State, ex rel. Brown, v. … Brown, Sweeney, Holmes, C. Brown and Krupansky, JJ., concur. Locher, J., concurs in the judgment. R.

Union Metal Mfg. Co. v. Kosydar

38 Ohio St. 2d 53 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 24, 1974

We face Fere a question left open by our recent decision in Dayton Sash & Door Co. v. Kosydar (1973), 36 Ohio St. 2d 120 , 304 N. … Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur in the judgment.

Toledo Bar Assn. v. Long (Slip Opinion)

179 N.E.3d 1262 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 10, 2021

See generally State v. … V(13)(B)(4) and (8).

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Zingarelli

89 Ohio St. 3d 210 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 14, 2000

In Akron Bar Assn. v. … In King v.

State v. Smith

14 Ohio St. 3d 13 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 7, 1984

United States v. Dorr (C.A. 5, 1981), 636 F. 2d 117 . … Brown, Sweeney, Locher, C. Brown and J. P. Celebrezze, JJ., concur. Holmes, J., concurs in judgment only.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Kendrick

147 Ohio St. 3d 395 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 1, 2016

V(13)(C)(1) through (5). … Bar Assn. v.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Land

138 Ohio St. 3d 357 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 27, 2014

[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Land, 138 Ohio St.3d 357, 2014-Ohio-1162.] DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. LAND. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Land, 138 Ohio St.3d 357, 2014-Ohio-1162.] … Similar Cases {¶ 28} The panel and board cite Disciplinary Counsel v. Smith, 128 Ohio St.3d 390, 2011-Ohio-957, 944 N.E.2d 1166, as supporting a sanction of indefinite suspension here. We agree.

In re Estate of Stiles

59 Ohio St. 2d 73 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 18, 1979

See State v. Brown (1890), 47 Ohio St. 102 ; Heyse v. Michalske (1940), 31 Ohio Law Abs. 484 ; Basickas v. Basickas (1953), 93 Ohio App. 531 . Appellee urges us to apply the reasoning of this court in Mazzolini v. … Brown, Sweeney* Locheu and Holmes, JJ., concur. Mahoney, J., of the* Ninth Appellate District, sitting for P. Brown, J.

Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Komarek

84 Ohio St. 3d 90 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 25, 1998

We adopt the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the board that respondent’s suspension for mental illness under Gov.Bar R. V(7)(D) should be terminated, and it is so ordered. … As we said in Cincinnati Bar Assn. v.

State Ex Rel. Columbus Blank Book Mfg. Co. v. Ayres

142 Ohio St. 216 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 17, 1943

It is not seriously contended that a board of elections comes within the statutory definition of either a subdivision or a taxing unit. ' The argument of respondent is that the members of the board of elections are county … A consideration of the mandatory provisions of Sections 2 and 27 of Article ÍI (legislative), Section 1 of Article III (executive), Section 2 of Article IV (judicial), Sections 1 to 7 of Article V (elective franchise) and

Cuyahoga County v. Cuyahoga County Budget Commission

27 Ohio St. 2d 22 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 30, 1971

Bd. v. Budget Comm., ante, page 153, in which a number of previous decisions of this court are analyzed. … Any other conclusion would, as we said in Brooklyn v.

Dayton Bar Association v. Scaccia

150 Ohio St. 3d 85 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 8, 2016

To support its finding of a Prof.Cond.R. 3.4(c) violation, the board cited two cases involving that rule: Akron Bar Assn. v. … To support its recommendation, the board cited Akron Bar Assn. v. DeLoach, 143 Ohio St.3d 39, 2015-Ohio-494, 34 N.E.3d 88, and Ohio State Bar Assn. v.

Dayton Bar Assn. v. Schram

122 Ohio St. 3d 8 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 30, 2009

As to sanctions in similar cases, the board compared respondent’s misconduct first with Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. … . v.

Dayton Bar Assn. v. Swift (Slip Opinion)

2014 Ohio 4835 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 6, 2014

SLIP OPINION NO. 2014-OHIO-4835 DAYTON BAR ASSOCIATION v. SWIFT. [Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as Dayton Bar Assn. v. … See Disciplinary Counsel v.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Falconer

160 Ohio St. 3d 1208 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 31, 2020

[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Falconer, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2020-Ohio-1194.] DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. FALCONER. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. … The board recommended that the agreement be accepted.

Columbus Bar Assn. v. Armengau (Slip Opinion)

160 Ohio St. 3d 445 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 14, 2020

V(18). … V(18)(C) therefore requires the board to stay any disciplinary proceeding based 2.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Nagorny

105 Ohio St. 3d 97 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 22, 2004

Bar Assn. v. Ostrander (1975), 41 Ohio St.2d 93 , 70 O.O.2d 173 , 322 N.E.2d 653 ; Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Belock (1998), 82 Ohio St.3d 98, 100 , 694 N.E.2d 897 ; and Disciplinary Counsel v. … Readmission predicated on repayment of funds), and Cleveland Bar Assn. v.

Geauga County Bar Ass'n v. Snyder

136 Ohio St. 3d 320 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 4, 2013

V(8)(G)(3). {¶ 13} With regard to the violation of Prof.Cond.R. 1.5(d)(3), the board cited two cases as precedent for its recommendation of a public reprimand. In Akron Bar Assn. v. … Id. at ¶ 8. {¶ 14} The board additionally cited Cincinnati Bar Assn. v.

Chan v. Miami Univ.

73 Ohio St. 3d 52 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 16, 1995

Brown v. … Likewise, in Frumkin v.