Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Falconer

  • 160 Ohio St. 3d 1208
  • 153 N.E.3d 126
  • 2020 Ohio 1194
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Filed
Mar 31, 2020
Status
Published
Cited by
2 cases
Authority
More cited than 69.1%

The opinion

[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Falconer, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2020-Ohio-1194.]

DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. FALCONER.

[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Falconer, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2020-Ohio-

1194.]

(No. 2020-0227—Submitted February 14, 2020—Decided March 31, 2020.)

ON CERTIFIED REPORT BY THE BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT.

____________________

{¶ 1} The Board of Professional Conduct filed a final report in the office of

the clerk of this court pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(16), in which it accepted the

agreement entered into by relator, disciplinary counsel, and respondent, Christine

Lynn Falconer. The agreement set forth the misconduct and the agreed,

recommended sanction of a six-month suspension from the practice of law, with

the entire suspension stayed on conditions. The board recommended that the

agreement be accepted. The court issued an order waiving the issuance of a show

cause order and this matter was submitted to the court on the report and record filed

by the board.

{¶ 2} On consideration thereof, it is ordered and adjudged by this court that

pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(12)(A)(3), respondent, Christine Lynn Falconer,

Attorney Registration No. 0069256, last known business address in Carrollton,

Ohio, is suspended from the practice of law for a period of six months, with the

entire suspension stayed on the conditions that respondent (1) undergo an

evaluation by the Ohio Lawyers Assistance Program (“OLAP”) within 60 days of

this order; (2) comply with any recommendations resulting from the OLAP

evaluation; and (3) refrain from further misconduct.

{¶ 3} It is further ordered that the Office of Attorney Services shall not issue

a certificate of good standing to respondent during any period of suspension,

including any stayed period of suspension.

SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

{¶ 4} It is further ordered that respondent be taxed the costs of these

proceedings in the amount of $1.83, which costs shall be payable to this court by

cashier’s check or money order on or before 90 days from the date of this order. It

is further ordered that if these costs are not paid in full on or before 90 days from

the date of this order, interest at the rate of 10 percent per annum shall accrue as of

90 days from the date of this order and the matter may be referred to the Attorney

General for collection. It is further ordered that respondent is liable for all

collection costs pursuant to R.C. 131.02 if the debt is certified to the Attorney

General for collection. It is further ordered that if costs are not paid in full on or

before 90 days from the date of this order, respondent may be held in contempt and

suspended until costs and all accrued interest are paid in full.

{¶ 5} It is further ordered by the court that within 90 days of the date of this

order, respondent shall reimburse any amounts that have been awarded against

respondent by the Lawyers’ Fund for Client Protection pursuant to Gov.Bar R.

VIII(7)(F). It is further ordered by the court that if after the date of this order the

Lawyers’ Fund for Client Protection awards any amount against respondent

pursuant to Gov.Bar R. VIII(7)(F), respondent shall reimburse that amount to the

Lawyers’ Fund for Client Protection within 90 days of the notice of such award.

{¶ 6} It is further ordered that respondent shall keep the clerk and

disciplinary counsel advised of any change of address where respondent may

receive communications.

{¶ 7} It is further ordered that service shall be deemed made on respondent

by sending this order, and all other orders in this case, to respondent’s last known

address.

{¶ 8} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies

of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(1) and that publication be

made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(2).

2

January Term, 2020

O’CONNOR, C.J., and KENNEDY, FRENCH, FISCHER, DEWINE, DONNELLY,

and STEWART, JJ., concur.

________________________

3

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.