Case law

Cincinnati Bar Association v. Wiest

148 Ohio St. 3d 683 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 19, 2016

Bar Assn. v. … Carroll, 106 Ohio St.3d 84, 2005-Ohio-3805, 831 N.E.2d 1000 (attorney submitted inaccurate time sheets while working for a state board); Disciplinary Counsel v.

Gilliland v. Adm'rs of Sellers

2 Ohio St. (N.S.) 223 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1853

It is true that certiorari is not a proper mode of reviewing a proceeding in chancery, as was hold in Galloway v. Stophlet, 1 Ohio St. 434 . … And it was held, at the present term of this court, in the' case of Barnard & Degraff v. Ingalls, that under our present practice such proceeding is not subject to review upon a petition in error.

In Re Complaint of Taxpayers

138 Ohio St. 287 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 28, 1941

The foregoing statutes confer full authority upon the Board of Tax Appeals for its action and decision herein. State, ex rel. Bartlett, Pros. Atty., v. Thatcher, County Aud., 138 Ohio St., 235 . … Board of Education of *293 Cleveland Heights City School Dist. v. Evatt, Tax Commr., 136 Ohio St, 283, 25 N. E. (2d), 453.

Lorain County Bar Association v. Williamson

150 Ohio St. 3d 382 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 27, 2017

Bar Assn. v. … Bar Assn. v.

Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Young

89 Ohio St. 3d 306 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 12, 2000

V(6)(J). … In making this argument, respondent fails to recognize that the board was created by this court to review evidence and make findings and recommendations regarding disciplinary matters. Gov.Bar R. V; Hecht v.

State v. Bauer

61 Ohio St. 2d 83 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 23, 1980

See, generally, People v. Anderson (1954), 126 C. A. 2d 702, 272 P. 2d 805 , certiorari denied, 348 U. S. 918 ; People v. Hayes (1977), 48 Ill. App. 3d 459 , 363 N.E. 2d 84 . … Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney, Locher and Holmes, JJ., concur. R.

State ex rel. Mallory v. Pub. Emp. Retirement Bd.

82 Ohio St. 3d 235 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 24, 1998

MALLORY, APPELLANT, v. PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT BOARD ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as State ex rel. Mallory v. Pub. Emp. Retirement Bd., 1998-Ohio-380.] … The board abused its discretion if it acted in an unreasonable, arbitrary, or unconscionable manner. State ex rel. Crabtree v. Franklin Cty.

State v. Blair

35 Ohio St. 2d 223 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 26, 1973

By reason of the holding and mandate of the Supreme Court of the United States in Roaden v. Kentucky (1973), 37 L. … Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur.

State ex rel. Celebrezze v. K & S Circuits, Inc.

6 Ohio St. 3d 354 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 31, 1983

In Squire v. … Brown, Locher, C. Brown and J. P. Cele-BREZZE, JJ., concur. Holmes, J., dissents.

State v. Saffell

35 Ohio St. 3d 90 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 3, 1988

State v. Mincy (1982), 2 Ohio St. 3d 6 , 2 OBR 282, 441 N.E. 2d 571 . … Brown, JJ., concur. Locher, Douglas and H. Brown, JJ., concur separately.

State ex rel. Balson v. Harnishfeger

55 Ohio St. 2d 38 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 5, 1978

In Miller v. … Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney and Locher, JJ., concur.

State ex rel. General Motors Corp. v. Industrial Commission

46 Ohio St. 2d 271 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 26, 1976

General Motors Corp., v. Indus. Comm. (1975), 42 Ohio St. 2d 278, 282 . The judgment of the Court of Appeals denying the writ is affirmed. . Judgment affirmed. O’Neiml, C. J., Herbert, Corrigan,- Stern.,- Celebrezze, W. … Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur.

State ex rel. Allied Chemical Corp. v. Earhart

37 Ohio St. 2d 153 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 20, 1974

Engle, v. Indus. Comm. (1944), 142 Ohio St. 425, 431 , 52 N. … Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Large

122 Ohio St. 3d 35 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 6, 2009

[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Large, 122 Ohio St.3d 35, 2009-Ohio-2022.] DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. LARGE. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Large, 122 Ohio St.3d 35, 2009-Ohio-2022.] … See, e.g., Bar Assn. of Greater Cleveland v.

State Ex Rel. Village of Manchester v. Shriver

113 Ohio St. 171 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 2, 1925

The board of public affairs is the board having supervision and management of this property. … "When it dearly appears in the pleading itself that the board, although having formerly approved the proposition, has subsequently disapproved it and refuses to go forward with the sale, the board is acting within the authority

Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Coats

98 Ohio St. 3d 413 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 9, 2003

Bar Assn. v. Clapp (1998), 84 Ohio St.3d 276, 278 , 703 N.E.2d 771 ; Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Estep (1995), 74 Ohio St.3d 172, 173 , 657 N.E.2d 499 . Accord Cleveland Bar Assn. v. … by the board and relator.

Mahoning County Bar Association v. Sciortino.

155 Ohio St. 3d 457 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 13, 2018

V(18)(A)(1)(a). … V(13)(B)(1) and (4). Moreover, the board was guided by the language of Prof.Cond.R. 8.4, Comment 5, quoted in Disciplinary Counsel v.

State ex rel. Stokes v. Brunner

120 Ohio St. 3d 250 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 16, 2008

Colvin v. … Lewis v.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Rammelsberg

143 Ohio St. 3d 381 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 28, 2015

Rammelsberg objected to the show-cause order, and we remanded the case to the board for further proceedings. Disciplinary Counsel v. … Effective January 1, 2015, the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline has been renamed the Board of Professional Conduct. See Gov.Bar R. V(1)(A), 140 Ohio St.3d CII. .

Mead Corp. v. Glander

153 Ohio St. 539 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 31, 1950

E. (2d), 652, and Dye Coal Co. v. Evatt, Tax Commr., supra. … E. (2d), 869; Brockton Knights of Columbus Building Assn., Inc., v. Assessors of Brockton, 321 Mass., 110 , 72 N. E. (2d), 406; President and Fellows of Middlebury College v.