Opinion

State ex rel. General Motors Corp. v. Industrial Commission

46 Ohio St. 2d 271
75 Ohio Op. 2d 322
347 N.E.2d 526
1976 Ohio LEXIS 630

Court: Ohio Supreme Court
Filed: May 26, 1976
Status: Published
On the bench: Brown, Celebrezze, Corrigan, Herbert, Neiml, Stern
Cited by: 4 cases
Authority: More cited than 56.0%

The opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant contends that “respondent grossly abused its discretion by awarding a percentage of disability in reliance upon medical reports of conditions (a) other than those for which the claim was allowed, (b) not supported by objective evidence of (c) new and changed conditions. ’ ’

However, a review of the record discloses that there is evidence which supports the findings of the Industrial Commission, and, accordingly, this court will not disturb that determination. See State, ex rel. General Motors Corp., v. Indus. Comm. (1975), 42 Ohio St. 2d 278, 282 .

The judgment of the Court of Appeals denying the writ is affirmed. .

Judgment affirmed.

O’Neiml, C. J., Herbert, Corrigan,- Stern.,- Celebrezze, W. Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.