Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersohio

10,000+ results

1.00s

  • Disciplinary Counsel v. Nicks

    124 Ohio St. 3d 460 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 25, 2010

    [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Nicks, 124 Ohio St.3d 460, 2010-Ohio-600.] DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. NICKS. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Nicks, 124 Ohio St.3d 460, 2010-Ohio-600.] … Bar Assn. v. Buttacavoli, 96 Ohio St.3d 424, 2002-Ohio-4743, 775 N.E.2d 818, ¶ 16.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Wills v. Union Savings & Trust Co.

    69 Ohio St. 2d 382 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 24, 1982

    Chapman v. Gibson, 3 Brown Ch., 229; Barr v. Hatch, 3 Ohio 527 ; Bispham, Eq., Secs. 193, 195.” Thomas v. Trustees of Ohio State University (1904), 70 Ohio St. 92 , 110. … Brown, J., dissent.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Seabolt v. State Hwy. Patrol Retirement Sys. (Slip Opinion)

    156 Ohio St. 3d 444 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 1, 2019

    Waters v. … Std., Inc. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Vermilion Campaign Commt. for Jean A. Anderson v. Lorain Cty. Bd. of Elections

    2025 Ohio 3250 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 10, 2025

    Maher v. Oda, 2023-Ohio-3907, ¶ 13, quoting State ex rel. Brenders v. Hall, 1995-Ohio-106, ¶ 17, fn. 1. In this case, the board’s exhibit is not authenticated by affidavit or otherwise under Evid.R. 901(A) or (B). … Clark v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Disciplinary Counsel v. Fitz

    169 Ohio St. 3d 409 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 8, 2022

    V(13), and the sanctions imposed in similar cases. {¶ 14} As aggravating factors, the board found that Fitz had a dishonest or selfish motive and that he had engaged in a pattern of misconduct. See Gov.Bar R. … V(13)(B)(2) and (3).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State v. Abner

    55 Ohio St. 2d 251 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 2, 1978

    Chapman v. California (1967), 386 U. S. 18 , and State v. Bayless (1976), 48 Ohio St. 2d 73, 106 , 357 N. E. 2d 1035 . … Brown and Sweeney, JJ., concur. Locher, J., concurs in the judgment only. O’Neill, C. J., and W. Brown, J., concur in the syllabus but dissent from the judgment. In addition to State v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Medina Cty. Bar Assn. v. Schriver (Slip Opinion)

    2022 Ohio 486 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 23, 2022

    V(11)(B). {¶ 7} The parties stipulated and the board found that Schriver’s conduct violated Prof.Cond.R. 8.1(b) and Gov.Bar R. … Bar Assn. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Lease v. Turner

    111 Ohio St. 38 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 17, 1924

    Rep., 88 ; Ross v. Williamson, 44 Ga., 501 ; People ex rel. v. Watts, 73 Hun, 404 , 26 N. Y. Supp., 280 ; State v. Colvig, 15 Or., 57 , 13 Pac., 639 ; People ex rel. v. McKinney, 52 N. Y., 374 ; State ex rel. v. … Y.), 481; State v. Churchill, 41 Mo., 41 ; State v. Porter, 7 Ind., 204 ; State ex rel. v. Falconer, 44 Ala., 696 . Entertaining the view that the legal question involved herein has been decided in State ex rel. v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Marshall v. Gibson

    19 Ohio St. 3d 10 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 9, 1985

    Co. v. Ritter (1902), 67 Ohio St. 53 . … Brown and Douglas, JJ., concur. C. Brown, J., concurs separately. Holmes and Wright, JJ., separately dissent.

    Cited 170 timesPublished
  • State v. Focht

    37 Ohio St. 2d 173 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 27, 1974

    Referring to the alibi notice statute, 2 *175 this court noted, in State v. … Brown, JJ., concur. Stern and W. Brown, JJ., concur in the judgment. R.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Karabin v. State Automobile Mutual Insurance

    10 Ohio St. 3d 163 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 25, 1984

    Brown, J. … Bartlett v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. (1973), 33 Ohio St. 2d 50 [ 62 O.O.2d 406 ]; Grange Mut. Cas. Co. v. Volkmann (1978), 54 Ohio St. 2d 58 [ 8 O.O.3d 70 ].

    Limited on other grounds by Savoie v. Grange Mutual Insurance, 67 Ohio St. 3d 500 (1993)Cited 173 timesPublished
  • State v. Huth

    24 Ohio St. 3d 114 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 18, 1986

    See Dayton v. Adams (1967), 9 Ohio St. 2d 89, 90 [ 38 O.O.2d 223 ]. … Brown, JJ., concur. Holmes and C. Brown, JJ., concur separately. Douglas, J., concurs in judgment only.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • DeRolph v. State

    83 Ohio St. 3d 1208 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 21, 1998

    . {¶ 11} Initially, it is important to identify the different constitutional authorities that distinguish the United States Supreme Court’s exercise of remedial power in Brown v. … . {¶ 13} Finally, Brown II and its progeny involved invidious discrimination based on race. Classifications based on race receive strict constitutional scrutiny. Adarand Constructors, Inc. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Disciplinary Counsel v. Horton

    124 Ohio St. 3d 434 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 24, 2010

    [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Horton, 124 Ohio St.3d 434, 2010-Ohio-579.] DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. HORTON. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Horton, 124 Ohio St.3d 434, 2010-Ohio-579.] … found guidance in Cleveland Bar Assn. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Utley v. Abruzzo

    17 Ohio St. 3d 203 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 5, 1985

    Stores, Inc., v. Brown (1956), 165 Ohio St. 521 , 525 [ 60 O.O. 486 ]. … Brown, Douglas and Wright, JJ., concur.

    Cited 38 timesPublished
  • Disciplinary Counsel v. Coleman

    144 Ohio St. 3d 35 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 25, 2015

    The panel and board examined several cases cited by the parties and found Disciplinary Counsel v. Edwards, 134 Ohio St.3d 271 , 2012-Ohio-5643 , 981 N.E.2d 857 , and Disciplinary Counsel v. … V(13), 140 Ohio St.3d CXXIV.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Chapnick v. E. Cleveland City School Dist. Bd. of Edn.

    93 Ohio St. 3d 449 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 17, 2001

    CHAPNICK, APPELLEE AND CROSS-APPELLANT, v. EAST CLEVELAND CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION, APPELLANT AND CROSS-APPELLEE. [Cite as State ex rel. Chapnick v. E. … Gerchak v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Disciplinary Counsel v. Insley

    104 Ohio St. 3d 424 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 15, 2004

    V(9). {¶ 11} Upon review, we agree that respondent violated DR 1-102(A)(4), 1-102(A)(5), 1-102(A)(6), 6-101(A)(3), 7-101(A)(l), and 7-101(A)(2), as found by the board. … . {¶ 12} We have decried attorneys who lie to the courts, Disciplinary Counsel v. Greene (1995), 74 Ohio St.3d 13 , 655 N.E.2d 1299 , Disciplinary Counsel v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Disciplinary Counsel v. Daniell

    140 Ohio St. 3d 67 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 23, 2014

    In Disciplinary Counsel v. … Applicable precedent {¶ 14} To support its recommended sanction, the board cites Disciplinary Counsel v. Eynon, 135 Ohio St.3d 274, 2013-Ohio-953, 985 N.E.2d 1285.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Disciplinary Counsel v. Goodman

    2024 Ohio 852 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 12, 2024

    this recommendation, the board primarily relied on Disciplinary Counsel v. … See Disciplinary Counsel v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.