Case law

State ex rel. Fleming v. Fox (Slip Opinion)

2019 Ohio 3555 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 3, 2019

McGinn v. … Jones v.

Stark County Bar Ass'n v. Marinelli

144 Ohio St. 3d 341 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 1, 2015

Effective January 1, 2015, the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline has been renamed the Board of Professional Conduct. See Gov.Bar R. V(1)(A), 140 Ohio St.3d CII. . … V(13), 140 Ohio St.3d CXXIV.

State ex rel. Chillicothe Gazette, Inc. v. Court of Common Pleas

2 Ohio St. 3d 24 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 9, 1982

Dayton Newspapers, v. … Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes and C. Brown, JJ., concur. Krupansky, J., not participating.

Henrietta Township v. Oxford Township

2 Ohio St. (N.S.) 32 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1853

*On this point we have been referred to the case of Henrietta Township v. Brownhelm Township, 9 Ohio, 77. … The court, however, charged the jury that they need not inquire as to the intention of Brown, the pauper, to make the township of Florence his place of residence, as intention was not involved in the matter.

State ex rel. Fraternal Order of Police v. Tegreene

58 Ohio St. 2d 235 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 30, 1979

Gherges, v. … Brown, P.. Brown, . Sweeney, Locher and Holmes, JJ., concur.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Hillman

145 Ohio St. 3d 489 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 24, 2016

Although the Board of Professional Conduct accepted the agreement, we rejected the recommended sanction and remanded to the board for further proceedings. Disciplinary Counsel v. … V(13)(C)(6). The board also found that Hillman had relied on his certified public accountant of some thirty years to file his tax returns.

Karabin v. State Automobile Mutual Insurance

10 Ohio St. 3d 163 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 25, 1984

Brown, J. … Bartlett v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. (1973), 33 Ohio St. 2d 50 [ 62 O.O.2d 406 ]; Grange Mut. Cas. Co. v. Volkmann (1978), 54 Ohio St. 2d 58 [ 8 O.O.3d 70 ].

Chupka v. Saunders

28 Ohio St. 3d 325 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 26, 1986

Brown, J., concurring. … Reed v. Rootstown Twp. Bd. of Zoning Appeals (1984), 9 Ohio St. 3d 54, 57-62 (Clifford F. Brown, J., dissenting). See, also, Dudukovich, supra; Cincinnati Bell v. Glendale (1975), 42 Ohio St. 2d 368 [ 71 O.O.2d 331 ].

Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Estep

74 Ohio St. 3d 172 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 20, 1995

1 Cincinnati Bar Association v. Estep. 2 [Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. … Green v. Huntington Natl.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Willard

123 Ohio St. 3d 15 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 30, 2009

[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Willard, 123 Ohio St.3d 15, 2009-Ohio-3629.] DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. WILLARD. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Willard, 123 Ohio St.3d 15, 2009-Ohio-3629.] … But see Cincinnati Bar Assn. v.

State ex rel. City of Cleveland v. Kosydar

36 Ohio St. 2d 183 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 26, 1973

Angell v. Toledo (1950), 153 Ohio St. 179 , 91 N. E. 2d 250 . See, also, East Ohio Gas Co. v. Tax Commr. of Ohio (1931), 283 U. … Brown and P. BROWN, JJ., concur.

State v. Sinito

43 Ohio St. 2d 98 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 9, 1975

Brown v. Walker (1896), 161 U. S. 591 . Cf. McCarthy v. Arndstein (1924), 266 U. S. 34 . Immunity laws can be found in the statutory framework of every state, 2 and, as characterized in Ullmann v. … Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur. R.

State v. Bishop (Slip Opinion)

156 Ohio St. 3d 156 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 21, 2018

FISCHER, J., dissents, with an opinion joined by BROWN, J. SUSAN D. … V.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Coleman

144 Ohio St. 3d 35 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 25, 2015

The panel and board examined several cases cited by the parties and found Disciplinary Counsel v. Edwards, 134 Ohio St.3d 271 , 2012-Ohio-5643 , 981 N.E.2d 857 , and Disciplinary Counsel v. … V(13), 140 Ohio St.3d CXXIV.

State Ex Rel. Lease v. Turner

111 Ohio St. 38 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 17, 1924

Rep., 88 ; Ross v. Williamson, 44 Ga., 501 ; People ex rel. v. Watts, 73 Hun, 404 , 26 N. Y. Supp., 280 ; State v. Colvig, 15 Or., 57 , 13 Pac., 639 ; People ex rel. v. McKinney, 52 N. Y., 374 ; State ex rel. v. … Y.), 481; State v. Churchill, 41 Mo., 41 ; State v. Porter, 7 Ind., 204 ; State ex rel. v. Falconer, 44 Ala., 696 . Entertaining the view that the legal question involved herein has been decided in State ex rel. v.

Smith v. McBride

130 Ohio St. 3d 51 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 20, 2011

Colbert v. Cleveland, 99 Ohio St.3d 215 , 2003-Ohio-3319 , 790 N.E.2d 781, ¶ 7 ; Lambert v. Clancy, 125 Ohio St.3d 231 , 2010-Ohio-1483 , 927 N.E.2d 585, ¶ 8 . … Colbert v.

State ex rel. Cleveland Browns, Inc. v. Indus. Comm.

1998 Ohio 565 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 30, 1998

CLEVELAND BROWNS, INC., N.K.A. BALTIMORE RAVENS, INC., APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as State ex rel. Cleveland Browns, Inc. v. Indus.

In re Receivership of Wisser & Gabler

5 Ohio St. 2d 89 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 9, 1966

Co. v. City of Youngstown, 147 Ohio St. 221 . See, also, Schotten *94 stein v. Newburger, 148 Ohio St. 71 ; Westerhaus v. City of Cincinnati, 165 Ohio St. 327 ; Price v. McCoy Sales & Service, Inc., 2 Ohio St. 2d 131 . … See Board of Elections for Franklin County v. State, ex rel. Schneider, 128 Ohio St. 273 .

State ex rel. Moraites v. Gorman

42 Ohio St. 2d 175 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 30, 1975

Brown and P. Brown, JJ,, concur. For an example of the statutory use of the word “imprisonment” in a context which requires ascribing to the word a definition broader than actual incarceration, see State, ex rel. … McKee, v. Cooper (1974), 40 Ohio St. 2d 65 , 320 N. E. 2d 286 (interpreting the meaning of the phrase “term of imprisonment,” as that phrase is used in R. C. 5143.05).

Disciplinary Counsel v. Hartley

177 Ohio St. 3d 261 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 5, 2024

V(13)(B)(3), (4), and (8). In addition, the board found two mitigating factors: the absence of prior discipline and the imposition of other penalties. See Gov.Bar R. V(13)(C)(1) and (6). … V(19) provides for. The board invoked the maxim of interpretation “expressio unius est exclusio alterius,” meaning that “the expression of one thing is the exclusion of another,” Baltimore Ravens, Inc. v.