Case law

Toledo Bar Assn. v. Manore (Slip Opinion)

2019 Ohio 3846 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 25, 2019

V(13)(B)(7). … Bar Assn. v.

Downing v. Cook

69 Ohio St. 2d 149 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 10, 1982

Wilson v. Cincinnati (1976), 46 Ohio St. 2d 138 ; West Jefferson v. Robinson (1965), 1 Ohio St. 2d 113 ; Porter v. Oberlin (1965), 1 Ohio St. 2d 143 , Ghaster Properties, Inc., v. … Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown and Krupansky, JJ., concur.

State ex rel. Brust v. Chambers-Smith (Slip Opinion)

156 Ohio St. 3d 331 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 14, 2019

Waters v. Spaeth, 131 Ohio St.3d 55, 2012-Ohio-69, 960 N.E.2d 452, ¶ 6. A relator must prove entitlement to a writ of mandamus by clear and convincing evidence. State ex rel. McDermott v. … Keith v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth. {¶ 8} The leading case on factual inaccuracies in parole records is State ex rel. Keith v.

Columbus Bar Association v. McCord

150 Ohio St. 3d 81 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 8, 2016

V(13)(B)(1) and (4). … Bar Assn. v.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Oviatt.

155 Ohio St. 3d 586 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 20, 2018

V(13)(B)(5). The board also concluded that he had a selfish motive. See Gov.Bar R. V(13)(B)(2). The only mitigating factor, according to the board, was Oviatt’s clean disciplinary record. See Gov.Bar R. … V(13)(C)(1). {¶ 31} Oviatt objects to the board’s aggravating factors.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Eisler

143 Ohio St. 3d 51 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 18, 2015

Effective January 1, 2015, the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline has been renamed the Board of Professional Conduct. See Gov.Bar R. V(1)(A), 140 Ohio St.3d CII. . … V(13), 140 Ohio St.3d CXXIV.

State ex rel. Burroughs v. Summit Cty. Bd. of Elections (Slip Opinion)

145 Ohio St. 3d 220 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 2, 2015

BURROUGHS v. SUMMIT COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS. [Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as State ex rel. Burroughs v. Summit Cty. … Elections—Mandamus—Nominating petition—Action to compel board of elections to place relator’s name on the ballot—Writ granted on the authority of State ex rel. Crowl v. Delaware Cty.

State ex rel. Queen City Chapter of Society of Professional Journalists v. McGinnis

10 Ohio St. 3d 54 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 4, 1984

See, also, Vorisek v. North Randall (1980), 64 Ohio St. 2d 62, 65 [ 18 O.O.3d 296 ]. … Brown, Sweeney, Locher, C. Brown and J.P. Celebrezze, JJ., concur. Holmes, J., dissents.

Columbus Bar Assn. v. Bulson

175 Ohio St. 3d 1 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 30, 2023

V(6)(C). … V(6)(C)(5). {¶ 31} In its second objection to the board’s report, relator “seeks clarification” from this court regarding the proper interpretation of Gov.Bar R. V(6)(C)(5).

State Ex Rel. Keyes v. Ohio Public Employees Retirement System

123 Ohio St. 3d 29 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 18, 2009

Because there is no statutory right to appeal the retirement board’s decision on service credit, mandamus is appropriate. See State ex rel. Schachter v. Ohio Pub. Emps. … See also Licht v. Storage Technology Corp. (May 6, 2005), Del.Ch. No. Civ.A. 524-N, 2005 WL 1252355, * 4, construing Berlin v.

Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Ass'n v. Sleibi

144 Ohio St. 3d 257 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 7, 2015

See Dayton Bar Assn. v. … Effective January 1, 2015, the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline has been renamed the Board of Professional Conduct. See Gov.Bar R. V(1)(A), 140 Ohio St.3d CII. .

Disciplinary Counsel v. Willard

123 Ohio St. 3d 15 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 30, 2009

[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Willard, 123 Ohio St.3d 15, 2009-Ohio-3629.] DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. WILLARD. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Willard, 123 Ohio St.3d 15, 2009-Ohio-3629.] … But see Cincinnati Bar Assn. v.

State ex rel. Polo v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Elections

74 Ohio St. 3d 143 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 9, 1995

POLO v. CUYAHOGA COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS. [Cite as State ex rel. Polo v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Elections, 1995-Ohio-269.] … Squire v.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Mancino.

154 Ohio St. 3d 49 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 2, 2018

V(12)(H) provides that as an alternative to a unanimous dismissal, a hearing panel can refer its findings of fact and recommendations for dismissal to the board for review. … To permit review by the board of unanimous Gov.Bar R. V(12)(G) dismissals would render Gov.Bar R. V(12)(H) superfluous.

C. E. Morris Co. v. Foley Construction Co.

54 Ohio St. 2d 279 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 24, 1978

Brown, J. … See Chicago Ornamental Iron Co. v. Rook (1915), 93 Ohio St. 152 , 160; Portage Markets Co. v.

Goudy v. Tuscarawas Cty. Pub. Defender

170 Ohio St. 3d 173 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 22, 2022

Arlow v. Ohio Rehab. Servs. Comm., 24 Ohio St.3d 153, 155, 493 N.E.2d 1337 (1986). That case, like the present one, involved the review of an employment-termination decision by the personnel board. Id. at 154. … See, e.g., Gwinn v. Ohio Elections Comm., 187 Ohio App.3d 742, 2010-Ohio-1587, 933 N.E.2d 1112, ¶ 15-16 (10th Dist.); McClendon v.

Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Estep

74 Ohio St. 3d 172 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 20, 1995

1 Cincinnati Bar Association v. Estep. 2 [Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. … Green v. Huntington Natl.

State v. Wilson

41 Ohio St. 2d 236 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 26, 1975

United State s v. Morgan (1954), 346 U. S. 502 ; Byrnes v. United States (C. A. 9, 1969), 408 F. 2d 599 ; Carafas v. LaVallee (1968), 391 U. … J., Corrigan and P, Brown, JJ., concur. HebbbRT, J., concurs in the judgment. Celebrezze and W. Brown, JJ., dissent.

Ohio Power Co. v. Burns

171 Ohio St. 3d 84 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 29, 2022

New Wen, Inc. v. … See R.C. 163.09(B)(1); Hoyle v.

State ex rel. Hensley v. Nowak

52 Ohio St. 3d 98 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 27, 1990

Kay, v. Brown (1970), 24 Ohio St. 2d 105 , 53 O.O. 2d 284, 264 N.E. 2d 908 . … Brown and Resnick, concur. Sweeney and Douglas, JJ., dissent.