Case law

City of Brooklyn v. Cuyahoga County Budget Commission

2 Ohio St. 2d 181 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 2, 1965

Section 5739.23, Revised Code, when read in composite as required by City of Troy v. … In Budget Commission of Lorain County v.

State ex rel. Brust v. Chambers-Smith (Slip Opinion)

156 Ohio St. 3d 331 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 14, 2019

Waters v. Spaeth, 131 Ohio St.3d 55, 2012-Ohio-69, 960 N.E.2d 452, ¶ 6. A relator must prove entitlement to a writ of mandamus by clear and convincing evidence. State ex rel. McDermott v. … Keith v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth. {¶ 8} The leading case on factual inaccuracies in parole records is State ex rel. Keith v.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Oviatt.

155 Ohio St. 3d 586 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 20, 2018

V(13)(B)(5). The board also concluded that he had a selfish motive. See Gov.Bar R. V(13)(B)(2). The only mitigating factor, according to the board, was Oviatt’s clean disciplinary record. See Gov.Bar R. … V(13)(C)(1). {¶ 31} Oviatt objects to the board’s aggravating factors.

Bilyeu v. Motorists Mutual Ins.

36 Ohio St. 2d 35 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 14, 1973

Co. v. Haworth (1937), 300 U. S. 227 . See Borchard, Declaratory Judgments (2 Ed.), 61. See, also, 22 American Jurisprudence 2d 845, Declaratory Judgments, Section 9. … J., Herbert, Corrigan, Stern, W, Brown ,and P. Brown, JJ., concur. This opinion is concerned primarily with the allegations dealing with the pyramiding of policies.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Treneff

104 Ohio St. 3d 336 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 15, 2004

V(6)(F). A master commissioner appointed by the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline granted the motion, making findings of misconduct and a recommendation, all of which the board adopted. … V(4)(G), VI(1)(A), and VI(1)(D) as found by the board. We also agree that an indefinite suspension is appropriate.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Bereday (Slip Opinion)

2019 Ohio 1895 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 22, 2019

V(13)(B)(2) and (4). … See Disciplinary Counsel v.

State ex rel. Moss v. Ohio State Hwy. Patrol Retirement Sys.

97 Ohio St. 3d 198 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 6, 2002

Gaydosh v. … Ryan v.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Milhoan

142 Ohio St. 3d 230 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 17, 2014

See Anders v. … relies on our decisions in Disciplinary Counsel v.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Gaul

175 Ohio St. 3d 12 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 29, 2023

V(12). … V.

State ex rel. Robinson v. Industrial Commission

11 Ohio St. 3d 238 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 27, 1984

Kramer, v. Indus. *240 Comm. (1979), 59 Ohio St. 2d 39, 42 [ 13 O.O.3d 30 ]; State, ex rel. Mitchell, v. Robbins & Myers, Inc. (1983), 6 Ohio St. 3d 481, 483 . … Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown and J. P. Celebrezze, JJ., concur.

Zakany v. Zakany

9 Ohio St. 3d 192 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 22, 1984

Harris v. Harris (1979), 58 Ohio St. 2d 303, 307 [ 12 O.O.3d 291 ]; State, ex rel. Turner, v. Albin (1928), 118 Ohio St. 527 ; Hale v. State, supra, paragraph one of the syllabus. … Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes and C. Brown, JJ., concur. Civ.

Batchelor v. Newness

145 Ohio St. 115 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 11, 1945

We also agree with that part of appellant’s argument wherein it is said: “However, the intent and purpose of the board of trustees in drafting and adopting the rule is quite clear.

State ex rel. Henry v. Grossmann

5 Ohio St. 3d 235 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 6, 1983

Harris, v. Rhodes (1978), 54 Ohio St. 2d 41, 42 [ 8 O.O.3d 36 ]. Appellant argues that the rule in State, ex rel. Heller, v. … Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown and J. P. Celebrezze, JJ., concur.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Bennett.

154 Ohio St. 3d 314 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 2, 2018

V(13)(C)(4) and (5). The board also attributed mitigating effect to Bennett’s payment of $4,500 in full restitution to Kelley’s family, see Gov.Bar R. … Bar Assn. v.

State ex rel. West v. Price

62 Ohio St. 2d 143 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 7, 1980

Marshall, v. Keller (1968), 15 Ohio St. 2d 203, 205 . The judgment of the Court of Appeals is, therefore, affirmed. Judgment affirmed. Celebrezze, C. J., Herbert, W. Brown, P. … Brown, Sweeney, Locher and Holmes, JJ., concur.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Lemons

168 Ohio St. 3d 580 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 13, 2022

V(13)(B)(4). … In Disciplinary Counsel v.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Mancino.

154 Ohio St. 3d 49 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 2, 2018

V(12)(H) provides that as an alternative to a unanimous dismissal, a hearing panel can refer its findings of fact and recommendations for dismissal to the board for review. … To permit review by the board of unanimous Gov.Bar R. V(12)(G) dismissals would render Gov.Bar R. V(12)(H) superfluous.

State v. Reeser

63 Ohio St. 2d 189 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 16, 1980

See State v. Pudlock, supra. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed. Judgment affirmed. Celebrezze, C. J., W. Brown, O’Neill, Sweeney and Locher, JJ., concur. Herbert and Holmes, JJ., dissent. … Brown, J.

State ex rel. Curry v. Industrial Commission

58 Ohio St. 2d 268 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 6, 1979

Goodenough, v. Indus. Comm. (1937), 132 Ohio St. 218 . •. … Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney, Locher and Holmes, JJ., concur.

American Bible Society v. Marshall

15 Ohio St. (N.S.) 537 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1864

The corporate capacity of the American Board of Commissioners for Foreign Missions to take by devise being expressly conferred by its charter; counsel make no question in respect to that ; nor is it claimed that these devises … And this view of the question is directly and fully sustained by the *544 supreme court of Pennsylvania, in Thompson v. Swoope, 24 Penna. St. Rep. 474.