Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.88s
State ex rel. Leneghan v. Husted (Slip Opinion)
154 Ohio St. 3d 60 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 23, 2018
See York v. Ohio State Hwy. Patrol, 60 Ohio St.3d 143, 144-145, 573 N.E.2d 1063 (1991). The Muskingum Board cites Harmon v. … McGirr v.
Cited 37 timesPublishedState ex rel. Ames v. Portage Cty. Bd. of Revision (Slip Opinion)
166 Ohio St. 3d 225 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 23, 2021
AMES, APPELLANT, v. PORTAGE COUNTY BOARD OF REVISION, APPELLEE. [Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as State ex rel. Ames v. … Martre v.
Cited 10 timesPublishedState Ex Rel. Howland v. Krause
130 Ohio St. 455 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 26, 1936
If the answer to that question is in the affirmative, then the Board of Elections was right in refusing to issue the certificate demanded, and the prayer for a writ-of mandamus should be denied. … We are of the opinion that the Board of Elections was right in refusing to issue the certificate that the charter had been adopted.
Cited 1 timesPublishedState ex rel. Gantt v. Coleman
6 Ohio St. 3d 5 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 13, 1983
Breaux, v. Court of Common Pleas (1977), 50 Ohio St. 2d 164 [ 4 O.O.3d 352 ], citing State, ex rel. Bowman, v. Asmann (1925), 113 Ohio St. 394 . … Breaux, v. Court of Common Pleas, supra. *6 For the foregoing reasons the judgment of the court of appeals is hereby affirmed. Judgment affirmed. Celebrezze, C.J., W. Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown and J. P.
Cited 176 timesPublishedFondessy Enterprises, Inc. v. City of Oregon
23 Ohio St. 3d 213 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 7, 1986
Akron v. Scalera (1939), 135 Ohio St. 65, at 66 [ 13 O.O. 376 ]. … Brown and Wright, JJ., dissent. Hoffman, J., of the Fifth Appellate District, sitting for Douglas, J.
Cited 51 timesPublishedState ex rel. Ames v. Portage Cty. Bd. of Commrs.
172 Ohio St. 3d 556 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 26, 2023
Inskeep v. … V.
Cited 12 timesPublished146 Ohio St. 107 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 19, 1945
not take effect “if a majority of the qualified electors residing in the territory affected” should file with the board a written remonstrance against the order of creation. … In Durst v. State, ex rel. TVatmough, 119 Ohio St., 262 , 163 N. E., 495 , the record disclosed that a new district had.been formed from a dissolved district and two tracts of land each carved from a different township.
Cited 1 timesPublishedState ex rel. Ames v. Concord Twp. Bd. of Trustees
179 Ohio St. 3d 184 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 27, 2025
AMES, APPELLANT, v. CONCORD TOWNSHIP BOARD OF TRUSTEES, APPELLEE. [Cite as State ex rel. Ames v. Concord Twp. Bd. of Trustees, 2025-Ohio-1027.] … The V Cos. v.
Cited 8 timesPublishedState ex rel. Kabatek v. Stackhouse
66 Ohio St. 2d 64 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 22, 1981
State, ex rel Hamlin, v. Collins (1981), 65 Ohio St. 2d 63 ; State, ex rel. Colangelo, v. McFaul (1980), 62 Ohio St. 2d 200 ; State, ex rel. Martin, v. Columbus (1979), 58 Ohio St. 2d 261 ; State, ex rel. Osborn, v. … Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes and C. Brown, JJ., concur.
Cited 3 timesPublished49 Ohio St. 2d 281 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 30, 1977
C. 2725.04 to withstand the motion to dismiss.,- As support for that contention, petitioner cites Featheringham v. Eckle (1957), 81 Ohio Law Abs. 450 . Petitioner’s reliance on Featheringham is misplaced. In Freeman v. … Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney and Locher, JJ., concur.
Cited 3 timesPublished32 Ohio St. 2d 48 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 29, 1972
Furthermore, the General Assembly prescribed that: “Any claim pending before the administrator of the Bureau of Workmen’s Compensation, a board of review, the Industrial Commission, or a court on December 11, 1967, in *52 … J., Schneider, Corrigan, Stern and Brown, JJ., concur. Even before Bairden, this court had occasion to discuss the basic proposition involved. See Hayes v.
Cited 96 timesPublished67 Ohio St. 2d 16 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1981
See State v. Milanovich (1975), 42 Ohio St. 2d 46 ; State v. Mishelek (1975), 42 Ohio St. 140 . … Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes and C. Brown, JJ., concur. Appellant’s brief contains ten propositions of law but several are axiomatic while others are verbatim restatements of State v.
Cited 100 timesPublishedState ex rel. Ames v. Big Walnut School Dist. Bd. of Edn.
2025 Ohio 2493 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 17, 2025
AMES v. BIG WALNUT LOCAL SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION. [Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as State ex rel. Ames v. … Cincinnati Enquirer v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedState ex rel. Brady v. Blackwell
112 Ohio St. 3d 12 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 7, 2006
Brady v. Blackwell, 112 Ohio St.3d 1 , 2006-Ohio-5752 , 857 N.E.2d 1181 . … Barletta v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedState ex rel. Tam O'Shanter Co. v. Stark Cty. Bd. of Elections (Slip Opinion)
2017 Ohio 8167 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 12, 2017
Grendell v. … See Prosen v.
Cited 28 timesPublishedState ex rel. Davis v. Industrial Commission
60 Ohio St. 2d 160 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 26, 1979
Ruggles, v. Stebbins (1975), 41 Ohio St. 2d 228 . In State, ex rel. Wallace, v. Indus. … Brown, P. Brown, Locher and Holmes, JJ., concur. Celebrezze, C. J., and Sweeney, J., dissent.
Cited 6 timesPublishedState ex rel. Wood v. Rocky River (Slip Opinion)
166 Ohio St. 3d 394 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 23, 2021
WOOD, ET AL v. THE CITY OF ROCKY RIVER ET AL. [Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as State ex rel. Wood v. … Eliza Jennings, Inc. v. Noble, 49 Ohio St.3d 71, 74, 551 N.E.2d 128 (1990), quoting Mills v. Green, 159 U.S. 651, 653, 16 S.Ct. 132, 40 L.Ed. 293 (1990). In Schuster v.
Cited 13 timesPublishedIn re Application of Black Fork Wind Energy, L.L.C.
138 Ohio St. 3d 43 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 18, 2013
See Richardson v. … Leon v. Cuyahoga Cty.
Cited 70 timesPublishedRhoades v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States
54 Ohio St. 2d 45 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 12, 1978
Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney and Locher, JJ., concur. The general rule recognized throughout the country holds .time-limitation provisions in insurance contracts, valid. … See Brown v. United States Cas. Co. (N. D.
Cited 51 timesPublished53 Ohio St. 2d 165 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1978
This court stated in Chapman v. … Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney and Locher, JJ., concur,
Cited 8 timesPublished
Ask Donna