Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersohio

10,000+ results

1.43s

  • State ex rel. Pate v. Industrial Commission

    97 Ohio St. 3d 89 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 23, 2002

    Cox v. … General Motors Corp. v. Indus.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Schaefer v. Allstate Insurance

    63 Ohio St. 3d 708 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 27, 1992

    Chapter 2711, see Ohio Council 8, AFSCME v. … Brown, J., concur in the foregoing opinion. .

    Disagreed with by McGuffey v. Lenscrafters, Inc., Unpublished Decision (1-23-2006), 2006 Ohio 206 (2006)Cited 178 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Gerhardt v. Krehbiel

    38 Ohio St. 2d 90 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 24, 1974

    Neelon, v. … McHugh, v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Office of Consumers' Counsel v. Public Utilities Commission

    61 Ohio St. 3d 396 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 14, 1991

    Brown, J., dissenting. … E.g., In re Williams (1991), 60 Ohio St.3d 85 , 573 N.E.2d 638 (State Medical Board’s decision not supported by record evidence); State, ex rel. Noll, v. Indus.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • In re Unauthorized Practice of Law

    175 Ohio St. (N.S.) 149 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 10, 1963

    Brown, Secy, of State (1962), 173 Ohio St., 114 , 180 N. E. (2d), 157. … The question remains whether the activities of Brown, Weiss and Wohl constituted the practice of law.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Kroeger v. Leonard

    151 Ohio St. 197 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 23, 1949

    Burgstaller, v. Franklin County Board of Elections, 149 Ohio St., 193 , 78 N. E. (2d), 352, and State, ex rel. Lemert, v. Board of Elections, 149 Ohio St., 211 , 78 N. E. (2d), 368. … Section 12283, General Code, defines mandamus as “a writ issued, in the name of the state, to an inferior tribunal, a corporation, board, or person, commanding the performance of an act which the law specially enjoins as

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Office of Consumers' Counsel v. Public Utilities Commission

    10 Ohio St. 3d 49 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 4, 1984

    Machine Co., v. Brown (1929), 121 Ohio St. 73, 75 ; Indus. Comm. v. Brown (1915), 92 Ohio St. 309 , 311. … Brown, Ford, Locher, C. Brown and J.P. Celebrezze, JJ., concur. Holmes, J., dissents. Ford, J., of the Eleventh Appellate District, sitting for Sweeney, J.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Raines v. Tobin

    138 Ohio St. 468 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 12, 1941

    Appellant filed with the Board of Elections of Summit county his declaration of candidacy for nomination as member of the council of Akron at the primary election to be held on August 12, 1941. … Appellant sought a writ of mandamus in the Court of Appeals to compel the board of elections to print his name on the primary ballot.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Smith v. Erie Ins. Co. (Slip Opinion)

    148 Ohio St. 3d 192 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 16, 2016

    Id. at ¶ 32, citing King v. Nationwide Ins. … The court noted that its decision conflicted -with the decision of the Twelfth District Court of Appeals in Brown v. Philadelphia Indemn. Ins. Co., 12th Dist. Warren No. CA2010-10-094, 2011-Ohio-2217 , 2011 WL 1782118 .

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Klink v. Eyrich

    157 Ohio St. (N.S.) 338 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 2, 1952

    The record of the hearing before the board discloses substantial evidence supporting the finding of the board, and such finding will not be disturbed by this court. The writ is denied. Writ denied. Weygandt, C.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Ryan v. Patton

    109 Ohio St. 208 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 26, 1923

    that all necessary proceedings were entered into, and it was duly resolved to sell bonds in the sum of 455.000: that the board advertised *209 for bids for such bonds; and that upon opening tbe bids tbe board accepted tbe … Patton, as president of the board, and that the president refused and still refuses to sign the same.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Insurance Co. of North America v. Bonnie Built Homes

    64 Ohio St. 2d 269 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 30, 1980

    Brown, J. In Mitchem v. … Brown and Locher, JJ., dissent.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Riggs v. Oak Lake Farms, Inc.

    26 Ohio St. 3d 173 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 25, 1986

    Anderson, v. Indus. … Thompson, v. Fenix & Scisson, Inc. (1985), 19 Ohio St. 3d 76, 80 . *175 Neither the report of Dr. J.Q. Brown nor the report of Dr. Robert L.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Fuldauer v. City of Cleveland

    32 Ohio St. 2d 114 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 13, 1972

    Hackley, v. … J., Schneider, Herbert, Stern, Leach and Brown, JJ., concur.

    Cited 35 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Maurer v. Sheward

    71 Ohio St. 3d 513 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 29, 1994

    See State v. Brown (Apr. 15, 1987), Hamilton App. No. C-850434, unreported, 1987 WL 9743, affirmed (1988), 38 Ohio St.3d 305, 528 N.E.2d 523. … Gen. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • United States Rolling Stock Co. v. Atlantic & Great Western Railroad

    34 Ohio St. (N.S.) 450 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1878

    In The Adams Mining Co. v. … Sanderson v. Etna Iron and Nail Co., ante 442; Twin Lick Oil Co. v. Marbury, 91 U. S. 587 ; Grymes v. Sanders, 93 U. S. 55 ; Brown v. County of Buena Vista, 95 U. S. 157 ; Clegg v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Keefe v. Eyrich

    22 Ohio St. 3d 164 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 31, 1986

    Brown, J., concurring. I concur in the analysis and result of today’s decision. … Vance v.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Fairview General Hospital v. Fletcher

    63 Ohio St. 3d 146 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 11, 1992

    Brown, JJ., concur separately. APPENDIX McCormac, Judge. … In Arbor Health Care Co. v.

    Cited 65 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Lowry v. Weiss

    122 Ohio St. 591 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 16, 1930

    The petition reached the board of elections thirty-one days before November 4. … The statute does not state where, or with what officer or board, it must be filed, and this court is therefore called upon to interpret the statute to determine which officer or board is referred to.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State v. Adams

    53 Ohio St. 2d 223 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 29, 1978

    The rule in Ohio, as expressed in Griffin v. State (1868), 18 Ohio St. 438 ; Browning v. State (1929), 120 Ohio St. 62 , 165 N. E. 566 ; and State v. McNicol (1944), 143 Ohio St. 39 , 53 N. … Chapman v. California (1967), 386 U. S. 18 . The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed. Judgment affirmed. Herbert, Celebrezze, W. Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney and Locher, JJ., concur.

    Vacated in part, on other grounds by Adams v. Ohio, 439 U.S. 811 (1978)Cited 125 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.