Case law

State ex rel. Baker Material Handling Corp. v. Industrial Commission

69 Ohio St. 3d 202 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 4, 1994

Brown and Kogut.” In Zamora we stated that the commission should not have based its decision on Dr. … Kogut’s report because of the regional board’s earlier implicit rejection of that report in deciding whether to allow claimant’s mental condition.

Leber v. Smith

70 Ohio St. 3d 548 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 19, 1994

Inland Refuse Transfer Co. v. Browning-Ferris Industries of Ohio, Inc. (1984), 15 Ohio St.3d 321, 322 , 15 OBR 448, 449, 474 N.E.2d 271, 272 . … Part V of the policy, the Business Auto Liability Insurance portion, listed the “Named Insured’s Business” as the “Board of County Commissioners.”

State ex rel. Consolidation Coal Co. v. Industrial Commission

18 Ohio St. 3d 281 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 24, 1985

Sibarco Corp., v. Berea (1966), 7 Ohio St. 2d 85, 88 [ 36 O.O.2d 75 ]; State, ex rel. Bargar, v. Ross (1978), 53 Ohio St. 2d 18, 19 [ 7 O.O.3d 62 ]. As was stated in State, ex rel. Pressley, v. Indus. … Brown, Douglas and Wright, JJ., concur.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Koehler

128 Ohio St. 3d 1222 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 5, 2011

[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Koehler, 128 Ohio St.3d 1222, 2011-Ohio-2385.] DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. KOEHLER. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. … , LANZINGER, CUPP, and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., concur. ______________________ 5

State ex rel. Sensible Norwood v. Hamilton Cty. Bd. of Elections (Slip Opinion)

148 Ohio St. 3d 176 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 22, 2016

Ditmars v. … Waters v.

Julia Realty, Ltd. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision (Slip Opinion)

153 Ohio St. 3d 262 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 27, 2018

SLIP OPINION NO. 2018-OHIO-2415 JULIA REALTY, LTD., APPELLANT, v. CUYAHOGA COUNTY BOARD OF REVISION ET AL., APPELLEES. … Tube Co. v.

Boalt v. Commissioners of Williams, Defiance, & Paulding Counties

18 Ohio St. 13 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1849

Kokitka v. Ford Motor Co.

73 Ohio St. 3d 89 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 16, 1995

KOKITKA ET AL., APPELLANTS AND CROSS-APPELLEES, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY ET AL., APPELLEES AND CROSS-APPELLANTS. KOKITKA, APPELLEE, V. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, APPELLANT, ET AL. … Willacy; Mayer, Brown & Platt and Lawrence C.

Richman Properties, L.L.C. v. Medina Cty. Bd. of Revision (Slip Opinion)

139 Ohio St. 3d 549 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 11, 2014

. {¶ 1} The Medina County auditor and the Medina County Board of Revision (“BOR”) appeal from a decision of the Board of Tax Appeals (“BTA”), in which the BTA reversed the tax-year-2008 valuation adopted by the BOR for four … Bd. of Edn. v. Union Cty.

Hickok Oil Corp. v. Evatt

141 Ohio St. 644 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 23, 1943

James, v. Brown, Secy, of State, 112 Ohio St., 590 , 148 N. … James, v.

Fairfield Twp. Bd. of Trustees v. Testa (Slip Opinion)

153 Ohio St. 3d 255 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 21, 2018

SLIP OPINION NO. 2018-OHIO-2381 FAIRFIELD TOWNSHIP BOARD OF TRUSTEES, APPELLANT, v. TESTA, TAX COMMR., ET AL., APPELLEES. … Bd. of Edn. v.

Snyder v. Bd. of P. Comm. of C. M. P. Dist.

125 Ohio St. 336 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 13, 1932

Akron Metropolitan Park District, supra, and also by McNab v. Board of Park Commrs. etc., 108 Ohio St., 497 , 141 N. E., 332 , and State, ex rel. Wadsworth, v. Zangerle, Auditor, 120 Ohio St., 464 , 166 N. … As is said in the opinion in the case of McNab v. Board of Park Commrs., supra, at page 502, [ 141 N.

Icon Owner Pool 3 Midwest/Southeast, L. L.C. v. Franklin Cnty. Bd. of Revision

155 Ohio St. 3d 260 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 25, 2018

. *820 {¶ 1} Because the Board of Tax Appeals ("BTA") did not fully consider the appraisal evidence presented by appellant, Icon Owner Pool 3 Midwest/Southeast, L.L.C., we vacate the decision of the BTA and remand the cause … for further proceedings on the authority of Terraza 8, L.L.C. v.

Lake County Bar Ass'n v. Needham

66 Ohio St. 2d 116 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 29, 1981

After an examination and review of the record in this cause, this court is unable to concur in the recommendation of the board of commissioners. … Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes and C. Brown, JJ., concur.

Dudley v. Morris

10 Ohio St. 2d 235 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 31, 1967

Nor does the decision of this court interpreting the 1959 amendment (Nunamaker v. … J., Zimmerman, O’Neill, Herbert, Schneider and Brown, JJ. concur.

State ex rel. Yost v. Columbus City Schools Bd. of Edn.

2026 Ohio 1878 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 26, 2026

GEN., v. COLUMBUS CITY SCHOOLS BOARD OF EDUCATION. [Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as State ex rel. Yost v. … Sheets v. Hobart, 11 Ohio Dec. 166, 210 (C.P. 1901) (“That the state through its attorney general can maintain an action in equity to enjoin a public nuisance is well settled.”); State ex rel. Brown v.

State ex rel. Stillo v. Gwin

18 Ohio St. 2d 66 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 2, 1969

In this action, relator seeks to prohibit the Board of Elections of Stark County from placing on the May 6, 1969, ballot a referendum on a zoning resolution of the Township Trustees of Plain Township, Stark County. … Janasik, v. Sarosy, 12 Ohio St. 2d 5 .

Lowe's Home Ctrs., Inc. v. Washington Cty. Bd. of Revision (Slip Opinion)

145 Ohio St. 3d 375 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 4, 2016

SLIP OPINION NO. 2016-OHIO-372 LOWE’S HOME CENTERS, INC., APPELLANT, v. WASHINGTON COUNTY BOARD OF REVISION ET AL., APPELLEES. … See GTE North, Inc. v.

Boellner v. City of Maumee

39 Ohio St. 2d 47 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 3, 1974

Stockdale Borough v. Astle (1963), 410 Pa. 257 , 189 A. 2d 152 . … See Butler v. Toledo (1855), 5 Ohio St. 225 .

State ex rel. Ganoom v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Elections (Slip Opinion)

148 Ohio St. 3d 339 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 16, 2016

We therefore see no defect in Ganoom’s affidavit. {¶ 7} Alternatively, Upper Arlington and the board of elections argue that Ganoom unreasonably delayed submitting his motion. … Because this matter has not yet *342 reached the Franklin County Board of Elections, we grant no relief against the board. Writ granted in part and denied in part.