Case law

Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Hardy

131 Ohio St. 3d 1227 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 30, 2012

[Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Hardy, 131 Ohio St.3d 1227, 2012-Ohio-1591.] CINCINNATI BAR ASSOCIATION v. HARDY. [Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. … V(8)(G)(3). If employed pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(8)(G), respondent shall refrain from direct client contact except as provided in Gov.Bar R.

Akron Bar Ass'n v. Henry

18 Ohio St. 3d 252 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 17, 1985

After a careful examination of the record in this cause, we concur with the findings of the board that respondent violated DR 9-102(A)(2) and (B)(4), as well as DR 1-102(A)(4). … Brown, Douglas and Wright, JJ., concur.

Toledo Bar Ass'n v. James

28 Ohio St. 3d 148 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 24, 1986

This court accepts the recommendation of the board of commissioners and hereby orders that the respondent be suspended from the practice of law in the state of Ohio for a period of one year. … Brown, Douglas and Wright, JJ., concur.

Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Edwards

11 Ohio St. 2d 171 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 19, 1967

The objections of the respondent are overruled, the report of the board is confirmed, and respondent is suspended indefinitely from the practice of law. Beport confirmed and judgment accordingly. Tapt, C. … J., Zimmerman, Troop, Schneider and Brown, JJ., concur. Troop, J., of the Tenth Appellate District, sitting for Matthias, J.

State ex rel. Sibarco Corp. v. City of Berea

7 Ohio St. 2d 85 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 6, 1966

Lorain County Savings & Trust Co., v. Board of County Commrs., 171 Ohio St. 306 . … Wesselman, v. Board of Elections of Hamilton County, supra; State, ex rel. Feighan, v. Green et al., Board of Elections, 171 Ohio St. 263 ; State, ex rel. Spiccia, v. Abate, Bldg. Commr., supra; State, ex rel.

State ex rel. Harshaw Chemical Co. v. Zimpher

18 Ohio St. 3d 166 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 10, 1985

Mitchell, v. Robbins & Myers, Inc. (1983), 6 Ohio St. 3d 481 . … Brown, Douglas and Wright, JJ., concur.

Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Grote

127 Ohio St. 3d 1 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 7, 2010

[Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Grote, 127 Ohio St.3d 1, 2010-Ohio-4833.] CINCINNATI BAR ASSOCIATION v. GROTE. [Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Grote, 127 Ohio St.3d 1, 2010-Ohio-4833.] … Cincinnati Bar Assn v.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Seabrook

133 Ohio St. 3d 97 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 6, 2012

[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Seabrook, 133 Ohio St.3d 97, 2012-Ohio-3933.] DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. SEABROOK. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. … Bar Assn. v. Buttacavoli, 96 Ohio St.3d 424, 2002-Ohio-4743, 775 N.E.2d 818, ¶ 16. {¶ 9} The only aggravating factors found by the board were Seabrook’s prior registration suspensions.

State ex rel. Lewis v. Board of Education of Wilmington School District

137 Ohio St. (N.S.) 145 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 26, 1940

The court cannot control that discretion or substitute its own discretion for that of the board of education. … The court thus would be making a selection that is within the absolute power and discretion of the board of education.

Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Luginbuhl

65 Ohio St. 3d 146 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 9, 1992

Upon review of the record, we agree with the findings of fact and recommendation of the board. Respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law in the state of Ohio for one year. Costs taxed to respondent. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Driscoll v. Austintown Associates

42 Ohio St. 2d 263 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 14, 1975

Roper involved the right of a party who appeared before a township board of appeals in opposition to a variance request to institute a R. C. … Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur. Section XIII (G) of the zoning ordinance created a township board of appeals.

Mahoning County Bar Ass'n v. Cregan

62 Ohio St. 3d 444 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 5, 1992

V(12)(b), the seriousness of respondent’s misconduct warrants disciplinary action as pursued here. We agree that respondent is guilty of violating DR 1-102(A)(5) as found by the board. … However, given our earlier rulings in Bar Assn. of Greater Cleveland v. Milano (1984), 9 Ohio St.3d 86 , 9 OBR 315, 459 N.E.2d 496 , and Columbus Bar Assn. v.

Oakwood Club v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision

1994 Ohio 347 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 13, 1994

Oakwood Club, Appellant, v. Cuyahoga County Board of Revision et al., Appellees. [Cite as Oakwood Club v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision (1994), Ohio St.3d .] … See Cincinnati Milacron Industries, Inc. v. Brown Cty. Bd. of Revision (1988), 35 Ohio St.3d 32, 517 N.E.2d 896. See, also, R.R.Z. Assoc. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision (1988), 38 Ohio St.3d 198, 527 N.E.2d 874.

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Leeth

42 Ohio St. 3d 97 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 26, 1989

We concur with the board’s findings and its recommendations. Accordingly, respondent is hereby indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs taxed to the respondent. Judgment accordingly. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Dunn v. Higgins

14 Ohio St. 2d 239 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 29, 1968

The court based its determination upon this court’s decisions in Bush v. Harvey Transfer Co., 146 Ohio St. 657 , and Ricks v. Jackson, 169 Ohio St. 254 . … Ricks v. Jackson, supra ( 169 Ohio St. 254 ); Wever v. Hicks, 11 Ohio St. 2d 230 .

Dayton Bar Ass'n v. Hannah

65 Ohio St. 3d 152 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 9, 1992

We agree that respondent committed the disciplinary violations found by the board, but modify its recommendation. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Ryan

89 Ohio St. 3d 240 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 21, 2000

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. RYAN. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Ryan, 2000-Ohio-145.] … Brown, First Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, for relator. __________________ Per Curiam. {¶ 7} We adopt the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the board.

Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Ass'n v. Freeman

128 Ohio St. 3d 416 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 31, 2011

V(6)(J); Ohio State Bar Assn. v. Reid (1999), 85 Ohio St.3d 327, 331, 708 N.E.2d 193; Trumbull Cty. Bar Assn. v. … Disciplinary Counsel v.

Lake County National Bank of Painesville v. Kosydar

36 Ohio St. 2d 189 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 26, 1973

In the latter case, “the strict letter of an act must * * * yield to its evident spirit and purpose * * Fleischmann Construction Co. v. United States (1926), 270 U. S. 349, 360 . See, also, Cochrel v. … BrowN, JJ., concur.

State ex rel. Johnson v. Cleveland Heights/University Heights School District Board of Education

73 Ohio St. 3d 189 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 16, 1995

Chavis v. Sycamore City School Dist. … Rollins v. Cleveland Hts.-Univ. Hts.